DOC PREVIEW
BU CAS LX 522 - Movement Theory

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

CAS LX 522 Syntax IFall 2000 November 13, 2000Paul Hagstrom Week 10: Movement TheoryMovement TheoryNP-movement: (passives, raising…)(1) Johni seems [ ti to speak Mandarin].(2) * Johni seems [ ti speaks Mandarin].“Tensed S constraint”NP-movement can’t escape a tensed IP.(3) Johni is known ti to have beaten Bill.(4) * Johni is known Bill to have beaten ti.“Specified subject condition”NP-movement can’t cross an overt subject.(5) John likes [me to win].(6) Johni likes [himselfi to win].(7) * Johni thinks [himselfi won].(8) Johni thinks [hei won].(9) Johni knows [himselfi to have met Bill].(10) * Johni knows [Bill to have met himselfi].A trace of NP-movement is an anaphor.Traces of wh-movement are r-expressions.Principle C says R-expressions must be free.(11) Whoi does John like ti ?(12) * Whoi does hei like ti ?SCO (=whoi likes himselfi?)(13) * Whoi did hei tell Mary that John likes ti?(=whoi told Mary that John likes himi?)(14) * Whoi did [hisi boss] see ti ?WCO (=whosei boss saw himi?)Crossover. A variable cannot be coindexed with apronoun on its left.(15) Everyonei said that hei saw Mary.(16) * Hei saw everyonei.(=e.o.i saw himselfi).(17) * [Hisi boss] saw everyonei.(=e.o.i’s boss saw himi).(18) Parla italiano. Italian(19) Habla español. Spanish(20) * Speaks English.EPP: SpecIP must be filled. With what?(21) pro parla italiano.(22) Giannii ha detto che proi parla italiano.John has said that — speaks Italian‘Johni has said that hei/j speaks Italian.’(23)Che allenatorei ti pensa che i giocatori loi odiano?‘Which manageri thinks the players hate himi?’(24)*Che all.i proi pensa che i giocatori odiano ti?‘Which mgr.i does hei think the players hate ti?’pro is a pronoun, just silent.Some languages allow pro (null) subjects.• Agreement (recoverability)• V2 seems to prevent null subjects.A separate category: Ellipsis of all kinds…(Mandarin)(25) Q: Zhangsan kanjian Lisi le ma?Zhangsan see Lisi ASP Q‘Did Zhangsan see Lisi?’ A: Zhangsan shuo [ — kanjian — le]Zhangsan say see ASP‘Zhangsan says (he) saw (him)’Two parameters:[±Recoverable deletion] (licenses ellipsis)[±Strong agreement] (licenses pro)“pro-drop”X-bar Theory Case Theory3θ-Theory 3Movement Theory Binding TheoryMove-α Move any category anywhere.Idea: Derive the conditions on movement fromgeneral constraints. If there’s a reason to movesomething, it can be moved.TSC, SSC derived already, NP-trace is an anaphor.EPP: SpecIP must be filled.[+Q]-CP: A [+Q] C must have a [+wh] specifier. Cyclicity condition:(26)[CP [which car]i [C′ did [IP you think [CP ti′ (that) [IP John would fix ti ]]]]]? Wh-island constraint:(27)[CP [which car]i [C′ do [IP you wonder[CP whenj [IP John will fix ti tj ]]]]]?Wh-island constraint reduces to cyclicity. Complex NP condition:(28)[DP the man [CP whoi [IP ti can fix the car]]](29)?? [CP [which car]i [C′ have [IP you met[DP the man [CP whoi [IP ti can fix tj]]]]]]Ah, cyclicity…?(30)[DP the rumor [CP that [IP Bill fixed the car]]](31)?? [CP [which car]i [C′ did [IP you hear [DP the rumor [CP that [IP Bill fixed ti]]]]]?No, just the Complex NP constraint.Can we do better, can we reduce them to one?(32)[CP [which car]i did [IP you think[CP ti′ (that) [IP John would fix ti ...(33)* [CP [which car]i did [IP you wonder[CP whenj [IP John will fix ti tj ...(34)* [CP [which car]i have [IP you met[DP the man [CP whoj [IP tj can fix ti ...(35)* [CP [which car]i did [IP you hear[DP the rumor [CP ti′ that [IP Bill fixed ti ..SubjacencyMovement cannot cross more than one boundingnode in a single stepBounding nodes: IP and DP.Subjacency derives:Cyclicity condition (hence wh-island constraint)Complex DP condition (both rumor-type and relative clauses)(36) ItalianTuo fratello (‘your brother’),[CP a cuii [IP mi domando to whom I wonder[CP che storiei [IP abbiano raccontato ti tj]]]],which stories they-have toldera molto preoccupato (‘was very worried’).(37)* Tuo fratello,[CP a cuii temo [DP la possibilità che abbiano to whom I-fear the possibility that they-haveraccontato tutto ti], ...told everything, ...CNPC islands are respected, wh-islands aren’t?(38) Mi sto domandandoI am wondering[CP a chii potrei chiedere ti [CP quandoj dovrò to whom I-may ask when I’ll-have-toparlare di questo argomento tj ]]speak about this topic(39)* Questo argomento, [di cuik mi sto domandando This topic of which I am wondering[CP a chi potrei chiedereto whom I-may ask[CP quando dovrò parlare tk]]]when I’ll-have-to speakmi sembra sempre più complicatoto-me seems ever more complicatedItalian bounding nodes: CP and DP. (Rizzi 1982)Arguments and adjuncts.(40)?Whose cari were you wondering how to fix ti?(Ed’s car...I was wondering how to fix Ed’s car.)(41)*Howi were you wondering whose car to fix ti?(With a wrench...I was wondering whose car to fix with a wrench.)What makes these different?(42) VP... RuVP VP how11with a wrenchV′ V′33V which car VEd’s carHeads are divided into two kinds:Lexical: N, V, A, PFunctional: C, I, DProper Government (first attempt)Government by a lexical head.Empty Category Principle (ECP)Traces must be properly governed(43) Howi did you fix the car ti ?Proper Government (final version)α properly governs β iff (i) α governs β and a is a lexical heador (ii) α antecedent-governs β.Antecedent Government (first attempt)α, a moved category, antecedent-governs β iffi) α binds β (c-commands & co-indexed)ii) no more than one blocking categorydominates β but not α.‘…if moving from β to α would not violate Subjacency’(Subjacency is very strong for adjuncts…?)(44) ? Which songi were you wondering [ whether the band will play ti ]?(45) * Which bandi were you wondering [whether ti will play that song]?(46) ? Which cari do you know how to fix ti?(47) * Whoi do you know how ti will fix the car?(48) Which bandi did you consider [ ti to be the best ]?Subjects are not usually lexically governed; and when not, they are subject to the ECP.Adjuncts that violate the ECP(that is, that are not antecedent-governed)violate Subjacency too, right?Do we really need both the ECP and Subjacency?(49) Zhangsan yiwei Lisi mai-le shenme?Z. thinks L bought what‘What does Zhangsan think Lisi bought?’(50) Zhangsan xiang-zhidao Lisi mai-le shenme.Z.


View Full Document

BU CAS LX 522 - Movement Theory

Documents in this Course
Syntax I

Syntax I

18 pages

Syntax I

Syntax I

42 pages

Syntax I

Syntax I

10 pages

Syntax I

Syntax I

109 pages

Syntax I

Syntax I

43 pages

Load more
Download Movement Theory
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Movement Theory and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Movement Theory 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?