DOC PREVIEW
USC IR 210 - IR 210 Session 10

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Friday’s case study:- case explores foreign policy tools and the connection between economic and security goals- key concepts for our understanding of the economic policy world- be ready for questions- 5 point essay due 2/12 in classVoice 2: Reinhold Niebuhr (1892 - 1971)- all politics = ethical choices/hard choices- friend of Morgenthau and Kennan- leaders need to be pragmatic and cautious - no utopias!- every action causes some collateral damage but people must act nonetheless - begging forgiveness for the evils done in service of the good- avoid hubris and arrogance of power- man’s pride and will for power disturb the harmony of creationNiebuhr- time of transition - another Grotian moment - how should we avoid future wars? how to order the system?- Niebuhr is a theologian - Christianity as a blueprint for reform/activism and commitment- published several books (Children of Light, Children of Darkness, The Irony of American History)- why should we confront the Soviets in a global war? do we really have the best system? is there an ideal system?- no political groups can create a society free of greed, deceit, injustice (only Marxists and deluded liberals think so)- need to avoid hubris and arrogance of power- no patience for those who say the US is acting on God’s behalf- warns against extremes- need for struggle and commitmentNiebuhr’s view of US Cold War Purpose: We are defending against tyranny and are trying to preserve justice against a system which has demonically distilled injustice and cruelty out of its original promise of higher justice > rationale for Global War on Terrorism?Final Modern Voice: Han Morgenthau (1904-1980)- refugee from Nazi Germany - convinced that the US needed to stand up to evil- advocated global leadership not isolation- originally criticized for focusing too much on power - seen as un-AmericanMorgenthau’s task- change the argument that realism was only a critique of utopianism/idealism?- sell the policy and academic worlds on a comprehensive theory that does 3 things: explain the essence of relations among states, illuminate the moral problem in statecraft, provide a basis for evaluating contemporary problems of national policy> Politics is an art not a science, and what is required for its mastery is not the rationality of the engineer but the wisdom and moral strength of statesmen> Moral principles and national interests are not opposing forcesMorgenthau’s Politics Among Nations (1948) introduces the 6 principles of realism:- politics governed by objective laws - human has not changed and all theory is based on person and experience- interest is defined in terms of power- power-control of man over man is universally valid- always a tension between morality and politics- moral actions/goals of state not universal- political sphere is autonomous - one of manyMorgenthau’s 4 Flaws of US Foreign Policy- utopianism and wishful thinking- legalism (laws are to keep the weak in line)- sentimentalism- neoliberalism> political world is about power and desire to dominateKenneth Waltz: neorealist- meaning of Neo: new or rethinking- looking for parsimony (few words) and elegance in a theory - one factor matters the most in terms of state behavior > system level which is defined by anarchy: The structure of the system has profound casual weightMearsheimer: Security Neorealism (The Tragedy of Great Powers)- security policy side: offensive - Mearsheimer> increase relative power expand and improve position in world> wary of all states> seek hegemony and opportunities to gain power> goal to seek relative and absolute powerMearsheimer’s assumptions- anarchy - no common power- great powers have enough offensive power to hurt or destroy each other- no state can be certain about the intentions of other states- survival is the primary goal of great powersFriday’s case study:- case explores foreign policy tools and the connection between economic and security goals- key concepts for our understanding of the economic policy world- be ready for questions- 5 point essay due 2/12 in class- Voice 2: Reinhold Niebuhr (1892 - 1971)- all politics = ethical choices/hard choices- friend of Morgenthau and Kennan- leaders need to be pragmatic and cautious - no utopias!- every action causes some collateral damage but people must act nonetheless - begging forgiveness for the evils done in service of the good- avoid hubris and arrogance of power- man’s pride and will for power disturb the harmony of creation- Niebuhr- time of transition - another Grotian moment - how should we avoid future wars? how to order the system?- Niebuhr is a theologian - Christianity as a blueprint for reform/activism and commitment- published several books (Children of Light, Children of Darkness, The Irony of American History)- why should we confront the Soviets in a global war? do we really have the best system?is there an ideal system?- no political groups can create a society free of greed, deceit, injustice (only Marxists and deluded liberals think so)- need to avoid hubris and arrogance of power- no patience for those who say the US is acting on God’s behalf- warns against extremes- need for struggle and commitment- Niebuhr’s view of US Cold War Purpose: We are defending against tyranny and are tryingto preserve justice against a system which has demonically distilled injustice and cruelty out of its original promise of higher justice > rationale for Global War on Terrorism?- Final Modern Voice: Han Morgenthau (1904-1980)- refugee from Nazi Germany - convinced that the US needed to stand up to evil- advocated global leadership not isolation- originally criticized for focusing too much on power - seen as un-American- Morgenthau’s task- change the argument that realism was only a critique of utopianism/idealism?- sell the policy and academic worlds on a comprehensive theory that does 3 things: explain the essence of relations among states, illuminate the moral problem in statecraft,provide a basis for evaluating contemporary problems of national policy> Politics is an art not a science, and what is required for its mastery is not the rationality of the engineer but the wisdom and moral strength of statesmen> Moral principles and national interests are not opposing forces- Morgenthau’s Politics Among Nations (1948) introduces the 6 principles of realism:- politics governed by objective laws - human has not changed and all theory is based on person and experience- interest is


View Full Document

USC IR 210 - IR 210 Session 10

Download IR 210 Session 10
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view IR 210 Session 10 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view IR 210 Session 10 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?