Realism “classical modern structural, neo-world, include pt theory.” Thucydides, Machivivelli, Hobbes, Metternich, Carr, Morgenthau, Kissinger, Walktz, MearsheimerLiberalism “classical, neo-and note emipiral vs normative liberalism”  Locke ,Grotiius, Kant, fukuyama, Doyle, Keohane, NyePromoters of universal religions marxisists, amnesty international, focus onthe global south  Cosmopolitan “many different approaches all insisting on the primacy of world society over international society.”Neo Debates Two DevelopmentsBy the end of the 1970’s, Neorealists and Neoliberals decided they could agree on one thin: states are rational actors seeking to maximize their utility.Keohane and Nye’s Power and Interdependence (1977) crystallized Neoliberalism.And then Walt’z Theory of International Politics (1979) crystallized Neorealism.These books paved the way for the 1980’s and early 90’s to become the heyday of the Neo-Neo debate—still central to much of IR.Keohane and Nye’s “Complex” or “Policy” interdependence refer to the set of costs and benefits created for specific groups in Country N when dominant groups of Country A try to realize their preferences and values in the Int. realm be influence their states foreign policy.Waltz **AnarchyKrasner of Stanford Fuses the Neos with “International Regimes” (1983) Fusion between NeosNeo Neo Synthesis beganDefinition: “International Regimes are principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures around which state expectations converge in a given issue-area.”Regimes are more enduring than mere temporary arrangements that change with every shift in power or interests. So how does this mark Krasner off as not quite your traditional Realist?Waltz would say**Therefore, states are CONSTRAINED. ANARCHY IS A LOT LESSFinally, regimes are also different from agreements, which are ad hoc, sometimes one-shot arrangements. A key purpose of regimes is to facilitate agreements.Ex: Trade RegimeMorgenthau “Addressing the realists”What is the link between imposition of tariffs and reduction in international relations?How is it exactly that international regimes can reduce anarchy?How can regime even be present in warfare, which should be the ultimate in anarchy?The Neo Neo Debate In summary1) both sides agree that regimes exists and are important2) Neorealists think powerful states are relatively less constrained by regime norms and rules.3) But neoliberals insist that once regimes are created , they ensnare all states in webs of governance that seriously undermine anarchy.How can you have… under anarchy?Hegemonic Stability TheoryOthers talk about… “Anarchy”Prisoner’s Dilemma “Two suspects are arrested by the police. The police have insufficient evidence for a conviction, and, having separated both prisoners, visit each of them to offer the same deal. If one testifies (defects) for the prosecution against the other and the other remains silent, the betrayer goes free and the silent accomplice receives the full 10-year sentence. If both remain silent, both prisoners are sentenced to only six months in jail for a minor charge. If each betrays the other, each receives a five-year sentence. Each prisoner must choose to betray the other or to remain silent. Each one is assured that the other would not know about the betrayal before the end of the investigation.”Security DilemmaTariff barriersGame Of ChickenCuban Missile CrisisHow to prevent the car crashes of international relations?Shadow of the future loomsRobert Axelrod – evolution of cooperation.The best strategy for iterated PDs “Tit for Tat”1)always cooperate with the other player at first; that is, don’t be the first one to defect2)if the other player defects, retaliate immediately--but only once. Don’t be vengeful.3)if the other resumes cooperating, then resume cooperating. But if she/he keeps defecting then keep defecting.Worst strategies“Always Defect never cooperation” (the psychopathic strategy) –Kim Hyon Ill"Always cooperate – Jesus strategy”they get annihilatedIR Lecture 12Realism “classical modern structural, neo-world, include pt theory.” Thucydides, Machivivelli, Hobbes, Metternich, Carr, Morgenthau, Kissinger, Walktz, MearsheimerLiberalism “classical, neo-and note emipiral vs normative liberalism”  Locke,Grotiius, Kant, fukuyama, Doyle, Keohane, NyePromoters of universal religions marxisists, amnesty international, focus on the global south  Cosmopolitan “many different approaches all insisting on the primacy of world society over international society.”-Neo Debates Two DevelopmentsoBy the end of the 1970’s, Neorealists and Neoliberals decided they could agree on one thin: states are rational actors seeking to maximize their utility.oKeohane and Nye’s Power and Interdependence (1977) crystallized Neoliberalism.And then Walt’z Theory of International Politics (1979) crystallized Neorealism. These books paved the way for the 1980’s and early 90’s to become the heyday of the Neo-Neo debate—still central to much of IR. Keohane and Nye’s “Complex” or “Policy” interdependence refer to the set of costs and benefits created for specific groups in Country N when dominant groups of Country A try to realize their preferences and values in the Int. realm be influence their states foreign policy.Waltz **AnarchyKrasner of Stanford Fuses the Neos with “International Regimes” (1983) Fusion between NeosNeo Neo Synthesis beganDefinition: “International Regimes are principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures around which state expectations converge in a given issue-area.”-Regimes are more enduring than mere temporary arrangements that change with every shift in power or interests. So how does this mark Krasner off as not quite your traditional Realist?oWaltz would say**-Therefore, states are CONSTRAINED. ANARCHY IS A LOT LESS-Finally, regimes are also different from agreements, which are ad hoc, sometimes one-shot arrangements. A key purpose of regimes is to facilitate agreements.-Ex: Trade Regime-Morgenthau “Addressing the realists” -What is the link between imposition of tariffsand reduction in international relations?-How is it exactly that international regimes can reduce anarchy?-How can regime even be present in warfare, which should be the ultimate in anarchy?oThe Neo Neo Debate In summary1) both sides agree that regimes