Paper organization:Using 3 views : realists, liberal, structuvism1 paragraph for outcomeTheoriesWhat is best and why?TOUCH ON THE OPTIONS NUASSANCE TO A CONCLUSIONLecture 3 questions concerning GCS1)What is he relationship or what are the relationships) between an expanding GCS and an ever-evolving international society of states?2) should states regulate GCS more tightly? If so, in what ways?3)Analyze a particular problem in the news (for example, the economic meltdown) from the perspective of GCS, both its good and bad side.Now the really big core question to end the term: Are we undergoing (even as we speak) a systemic transformation in international relations – comparable to the shift from the classical world to the modern world?Interaction CapacityB and Little contend that physical technologies for increasing interaction capacity have reached a kind of limit.What will happen when half the world’s population secures internet access? Or when 75% secures it. Will there be some sort of globe-wide transformation in the socio-cultural system? What will be the effect on the other systems?Process: Probably the major transformations have already been made. The center-periphery process formation look likes to be durable for some time to come. Center-periphery process formation dynamics generate the distinct zone of peace and zone of conflict.Major Process Transformations Still UnderwayThe democratic peace and globalization (jointly)but will democracy continue to spread or is this as fat as its going?Will globalization even reach an end and possibly go into reverse2. The rise of environmental processes not only as a new key variable in human affairs, but as a candidate for becoming the dominant process.Units: will military political units (states as we have known them) lose their dominant position? Are we witnessing the transition to a new type of unit: the postmodern state?1.the erosion of hard boundaries and strong sovereignty and their replacement by a negotiated arrangement of permeable boundaries, layered sovereignty, and common international and transnational spaces.2. economic and civic units have achieved and increase in relative autonomy, so now there are multiple types of units that are functionally differentiated.*************Structures: there probably wont be transformations in the main shapes of structure, but there might be shifts in the relative importance of the various structures at play in the system.Structures: military-politicalcomparative advantage will shift away from military capability and toward economic prowess, societal dynamism, and the diplomatic skills necessary to build – and to expand – strong subsystems of international society.The globalization of the economy continues it will create problems and you will have states…. (listen)Socio Culturally: Along with the intensification of the market comes an intensification of international society, marked by the steady spread ( voluntary and imposed ) of a wider range of rues, norms , and institutions.If western relative power declines, will the international society of states start to crumble?Or will globe wide – “westernistic” values stop that from happening? **** read chapter for final.IR Lecture 27Paper organization: Using 3 views : realists, liberal, structuvism1 paragraph for outcomeTheoriesWhat is best and why?TOUCH ON THE OPTIONS NUASSANCE TO A CONCLUSIONLecture3 questions concerning GCS1)What is he relationship or what are the relationships) between an expanding GCS and an ever-evolving international society of states?2) should states regulate GCS more tightly? If so, in what ways?3)Analyze a particular problem in the news (for example, the economic meltdown) from the perspective of GCS, both its good and bad side.Now the really big core question to end the term: Are we undergoing (even as we speak) a systemic transformation in international relations – comparable to the shift from the classical world to the modern world?Interaction CapacityB and Little contend that physical technologies for increasing interaction capacity have reached a kind of limit.What will happen when half the world’s population secures internet access? Or when 75% secures it. Will there be some sort of globe-wide transformation in the socio-cultural system? What will be the effect on the other systems?Process: Probably the major transformations have already been made. The center-periphery process formation look likes to be durable for some time to come. Center-periphery process formation dynamics generate the distinct zone of peace and zone of conflict.Major Process Transformations Still UnderwayThe democratic peace and globalization (jointly)but will democracy continue to spread or is this as fat as its going?Will globalization even reach an end and possibly go into reverse2. The rise of environmental processes not only as a new key variable in human affairs, but as a candidate for becoming the dominant process.Units: will military political units (states as we have known them) lose their dominant position? Are we witnessing the transition to a new type of unit: the postmodern state?1.the erosion of hard boundaries and strong sovereignty and their replacement by a negotiated arrangement of permeable boundaries, layered sovereignty, and common international and transnational spaces.2. economic and civic units have achieved and increase in relative autonomy, so now there are multiple types of units that are functionally differentiated.*************Structures: there probably wont be transformations in the main shapes of structure, but there might be shifts in the relative importance of the various structures at play in the system.Structures: military-politicalcomparative advantage will shift away from military capability and toward economic prowess, societal dynamism, and the diplomatic skills necessary tobuild – and to expand – strong subsystems of international society.The globalization of the economy continues it will create problems and you will have states…. (listen)Socio Culturally: Along with the intensification of the market comes an intensification of international society, marked by the steady spread ( voluntary and imposed ) of a wider range of rues, norms , and institutions.If western relative power declines, will the international society of states start to crumble?Or will globe wide – “westernistic” values stop that from happening? **** read chapter for