DOC PREVIEW
USC IR 210 - IR Lecture 4

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Structure3 Types of International SystemsFull international systemsEconomic international systemsPre international systemsMilitary Political StructureQUESTIONThe normal form of the strategic international systems was hierarchical, not anarchic.The units didn’t necessarily or even usually become structurally alike through “shaping and shoving”2 types of hierarchal systems:Suzerainty:Dominion:Why Not Neorealist Structure?The imperial (hierarchical) form was both legitimate and unstable.Economic StructurePolitical Units were the main economic actors, but did this mean that “command” (as opposed to market) economic structure prevailed universally?Socio Cultural StructureReligionInternational Society (limited) due to the interaction capacity.A GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM IFrom 1500, the rise of the west transforms world history.The key reasons , the Europeans pioneered the MODERN State.What preceded the rise of the modern stat?Feudal Empires (650-950)Feudal Anarchy (950-1150Feudal (not yet “modern”) states-system (1150-1450)Heteronomysubordination or subjection to the law of another; political subjection of a community or state;- opposed to AUTONOMY.Essence of the modern state1. It cultivated precise hard boundaries rather than fuzzy frontiers and within those boundaries it claimed absolute sovereignty.2. It was characterized by a COMBINATION of military, extractive, administrative, redistributive, and productive organizations, governing multiple contiguous regions and their cities, and MIXING CAPITAL AND COERCIANIR Lecture 5Structure3 Types of International Systems-Full international systems-Economic international systems-Pre international systemsMilitary Political Structure-QUESTIONoThe normal form of the strategic international systems was hierarchical, not anarchic.The units didn’t necessarily or even usually become structurally alike through “shaping and shoving”2 types of hierarchal systems:Suzerainty: Dominion:Why Not Neorealist Structure?The imperial (hierarchical) form was both legitimate and unstable. oEconomic StructurePolitical Units were the main economic actors, but did this mean that “command” (as opposed to market) economic structure prevailed universally?oSocio Cultural StructureReligionInternational Society (limited) due to the interaction capacity.A GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM I-From 1500, the rise of the west transforms world history.-The key reasons , the Europeans pioneered the MODERN State.What preceded the rise of the modern stat?-Feudal Empires (650-950)-Feudal Anarchy (950-1150-Feudal (not yet “modern”) states-system (1150-1450)Heteronomy-subordination or subjection to the law of another; political subjection of a community or state;- opposed to AUTONOMY.Essence of the modern state-1. It cultivated precise hard boundaries rather than fuzzy frontiers and within those boundaries it claimed absolute sovereignty. -2. It was characterized by a COMBINATION of military, extractive, administrative, redistributive, and productive organizations, governing multiple contiguous regions and their cities, and MIXING CAPITAL AND


View Full Document

USC IR 210 - IR Lecture 4

Download IR Lecture 4
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view IR Lecture 4 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view IR Lecture 4 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?