DOC PREVIEW
TAMU PSYC 107 - Stereotypes and Altruism
Type Lecture Note
Pages 3

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSYC 107 1nd EditionLecture 35Outline of Last LectureI. Social InfluenceII. Obedience to Authority III. Individual Behavior in a GroupIV. Deindividuation Outline of Current LectureI. Group PolarizationII. Social RelationsIII. AltruismIV. Effects of StereotypingV. Bystander InterventionCurrent LectureI. Group Interaction-Group PolarizationEnhances a group's prevailing attitudes through a discussionCohesivenessRisky shift **read in book**-GroupthinkA mode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony Avoiding groupthinkHave a leader wait to voice opinionUsing expert from the "outside"Having a "devil's advocate"II. Social Relations-Social psychology reaches us how we relate to one another:PrejudiceDerived from "prejudgment"A unjusitifiable (usually negative) attitude toward a group and its memebersUsually directed towards different cultural, ethnic, and gender groupsComponents:These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.- Beliefs (Stereotypes)-Emotions (hostility, envy, fear)- Predisposition to actClose-up-Implicit racial associations- Unconscious patronization-Race-influenced perceptions- Seeing black-Reflexive body responsesSocial roots of prejudice- Social inequity increases prejudice-"you get what you deserve" mentality -Makes the world feel like a better place-Social divisions: ingroup and outgroup-Ingroup bias: identities are based on group membership-Us vs them-Team: homogeneous vs heterogeneous-Emotional scapegoat-Scapegoat theory: when people feel bad or insecure, it helps restore their self-esteem by putting down othersCognitive roots of prejudice- Categorization: -Vivid case; only remember what is most vividOvercoming prejudice- Conflict: perceive incompatibility of actions, or ides-Create a goal that the two groups together can complete together-Give them a reason to join together -Jigsaw classrooms- classrooms during when they were first desegregated; used cooperation rather than competition-Cooperation toward a reward over a shared threatIII. Altruism-An unselfish regard for the welfare of others-Factors that influenceSituation influencesVictim characteristicsMoods-Happy people help moreIndividual and gender differencesMenExtravertedMedical workersIV. Effects of stereotyping-Stereotype threat:The fear or apprehension that confirm negative stereotypes about group membershipMembers of stereotyped group sometimes perform more poorly on tests because they are distracted/anxious about whether their performance will congfrim a negative stereotype held about the group's ability V. Bystander Intervention-Kitty GenoveseRaped and killed30 people heardNo one came to help-Deletha Word-It is better to have only one person around to help-If there is a group of people, they will all look around for what to


View Full Document

TAMU PSYC 107 - Stereotypes and Altruism

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 3
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Stereotypes and Altruism
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Stereotypes and Altruism and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Stereotypes and Altruism 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?