DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley ELENG C235 - Solar Cells

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 18 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 18 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

EE 235/NSE 203Solar CellsProf. Connie Chang-Hasnain263M Cory HallEECS Department3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20092Guidelines for Class Presentation• Each person will give two presentations: each 7 min + 3 min Q&A.• Need 17 presentations for next Monday 3/2 on solar cells.• Graded by your peers – 1: Excellent (i.e. I have learned something)– 2: OK (i.e. clear presentation)– 3: Lack of preparation or understanding• By 2/25 (5 days before your presentation)– email Vadim and me a paper or a set of papers you want to review.• By 3/1 (1 day before presentation)– Email Vadim and me your presentations3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20093Absorption in SemiconductorAssuming is indepent of k; Fv=1 and fc=0  Efc=Efv=Efmris effective reduced mass3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20094Loss in Semiconductor3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20095Gain in Semicond.3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20096Outline• Overview of energy demand• Photovoltaic (solar cell) principles• Solar concentration• High efficiency multi-junction cells• Summary3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20097World Energy Production Millions of Barrels per Day (Oil Equivalent)30020010001860 1900 1940 1980 2020 2060 2100Source: John F. Bookout,“Two Centuries of Fossil Fuel Energy” International Geological Congress, Washington DC; July 10,1985. Episodes, 12, 257-262 (1989). 3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20098US CO2Emissions 20050100200300400500600Residential Commercial Industrial Transportation Electricity GenerationMillions of tonnes per year Carbon equivalentNatural GasPetroleumCoalLDVsTrucks BusesAirSource: U.S. EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, April 20073/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20099Electric Power Generation• Solar is microscopic. Why?103104105106US Electricity Generation (GWh)2004200220001998199619941992YearWindGeothermalHydroelectricNatural GasNuclearCoalTOTAL Solar Solar source of data: Energy Information Administration3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200910Cost of Electricity Source: J. Weyant, Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford UniversityLevelized Cost Comparison for Electric Power GenerationWith $100 per Ton Tax on Carbon (2008 Fuel Prices)00.050.10.150.20.250.30.35Nuclear Coal Gas CC Gas CT Solar PV SolarThermalWindGeneration TechnologyCarbon TaxFuel-2008Variable O&MFixed O&M ChargesCapital Charges$/KWHr(2008$s )3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200911Source of Energy in US• Coal-32%• Natural Gas-30%• Oil-18%-for transportation• Nuclear-12%• Hydropower-5%• Renewable-1%3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 20091205101520253035404550OilCoalGasFissionBiomassHydroelectricSolar, wind, geothermal0.5% Source: BP & IEA2004The ENERGY REVOLUTION(The Terawatt Challenge)14.5 Terawatts220 M BOE/dayThe Basis of Prosperity20stCentury = OIL05101520253035404550OilCoalGasFusion / FissionBiomassHydroelectricSolar, wind, geothermal205030 -- 60 Terawatts450 – 900 MBOE/day21stCentury = ??3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200913165,000 TW of sunlight hit the earthOur Energy Challenge2004 6.5 Billion People14.5 Terawatts2050 ~ 10 Billion People30-60 TerawattsNeed to convert 0.025 %of incident solar energy3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200914http://www.nd.edu/~pkamat/energyconversion.html3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 2009152006 Market Summary• World wide installations reached 1.7 GW with 19% growth rate.• Global industry revenues were $10.6 bn in 2006, while capital investmentthrough the PV business chain equaling $2.8 bn.• Over $4 bn in equity and debt financing, up from $1.8 bn in 2005. Marketbuzz™ 2007: ANNUAL WORLD SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC REPORT 3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200916Primary Applications for PV Systems Off-grid Domestic: typically around 1 kW and 1-2 km from power lines.Grid-connected centralized: for power stations. Off-grid nondomestic:The first commercial, terrestrial application. PV are commerciallycost competitive with other sources.TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONSSurvey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2005; Report IEA-PVPS T1-15:2006Grid-Connected Distributed:Public and commercial buildings, motorway sound barriers, 1-100kW3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200917Cumulative Installed PV Power(International Energy Agency countries)• Grid-connected is 3.7 GW or 86% of total. (IEA 2006 report)• Off-grid non-domestic and domestic are 8.4% and 5.5%.3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200918Competing Technologies• Flat Panel Silicon– Simple arrays of large-area PV cells, fixed at latitude tilt– Cost is dominated by the cost of high-quality mono-crystalline silicon– Polycrystalline Si is cheaper than single-crystal, but is also less efficient– Single Crystal 17-18% (SunPower)– Poly Silicon 14-16% (Kyocera)• Thin-Film– Fixed flat-panels – Lowest cost per watt, but efficiency is much lower thus requiring 2-3 times larger area for same power output. – CdTe Thin Film 10 % (First Solar)– CIGS Thin Film 14 % (e.g. NanoSolar)• Concentrator CPV – Dramatically reducing the area of semiconductor through high concentration (200-1000X) – Requires precise 2-axis tracking– Si Single Crystal 18% (Amonix)– III-V Multi-Junction 22.5% (Concentrix)Note: Percentage figures are best estimates of module efficiency3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200919History of PV Efficiency (Research Cells)3/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 2009203/1/2009Prof. Chang-Hasnain EE 235/ NSE 203 Sp 200921Current Research Directions• CIGS– Can be deposited on flexible material  low cost– Conversion efficiency is similar to that of silicon (~20%)• Multijunction– Higher power conversion efficiency – Higher cost• Polymer – Inexpensive (disposable ?)– Less reliable (degrade over time)– Low power conversion efficiency• Nanocrystalline solar cells– Conversion efficiency achieved so far: 3%– Still at its infancy, but there


View Full Document

Berkeley ELENG C235 - Solar Cells

Documents in this Course
Nanowires

Nanowires

24 pages

Nanowires

Nanowires

21 pages

Load more
Download Solar Cells
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Solar Cells and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Solar Cells 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?