Unformatted text preview:

Travis'(Chapter(1(Criminal(Justice(Perspectives(• Sociologists(often(speak(of(the(purposes(of(social(institutions(as(“functions.”(o Functions:(The(goals(served(by(a(social(instit u tion.( Ex:(Schools(serve(the(functions(of(education(• Manifest(Functions:(The(stated(purposes(of(the(institution.(o Ex:(Schools(serve(the(manifest(function(of(education(through(teaching(students(various(academic(subjects.((• Latent(Functions:(The(unstated(or(hidden(g oa ls.((o Ex:(providing(child(care(and(controlling(the(workforce(by(otherwise(occupying(millions(of(young(people.((• Social(Control:(The(label(given(to(the(processes(and(structures(that(seek(to(limit(rule'breaking(behavior,(or(deviance.((o Most(discussions(of(social(control(attempt(to(classify(the(different(means(by(which(conformity(is(achieved.((• Types(of(social(control:((o Formal(social(control:(( Includes(those(sanctions(applied(by(some(authorized(body(after(a(public(finding(of(fault.((o Informal(Social(Control:(( Refers(to(mechanisms(that(influence(behavior(without(the(need(for(public(finding(of(fault(or(the(use(of(group;(“authorized”(sanctions.((• Criminal(Justice(as(a(social(control:((o The(primary(function(of(criminal(justice(is(social(control.((o The(components:(police,(courts(and(corrections.(( Manifest(functions:(controlling(different(kinds(of(deviance(defined(as(crime.((• Most(social(control(works(through(informal(mechanisms.((o Criminal-Justice'(The(formal(institution(designed(to(respond(to(deviance(defined(as(crime.(( Crime(control(is(the(primary(purpose(of(the(criminal(justice(system,(but(also(serves(as(other(latent(functions.((• In(general,(the(criminal(justice(process(is(a(formal(social(control(mechanism(• The(basic(social(control(took(available(to(agents(of(the(criminal(justice(process(is(“group'authorized”(punishment.((o Community(Justice:(An(approach(to(social(control(as(it(sees(the(criminal(process(as(an(integral(part(of(other(community(institutions.(( “Crime(is(a(symptom(of(problems(in(communities(• The(“Comprehensive(Communities(Program”'(1994.((o Based(on(the(principles(that(communities(must(take(a(leadership(role(in(combating(crime(and(violence((o Perspectives(on(Criminal(Justice( Criminal(Justice(has(frequently(been(accused(of(being(“atheoretical”(or(lacking(a(unifying(perspective(or(set(of(perspectives(in(which(operations(of(criminal(justice(agents(can(be(understood.((• They(say(criminal(justice(has(not(yet(achieved(theoretical(integrity(and(coherence.((o Criminal(Justice(Theory:(( Theory:(A(logical(explanation(of(something.((• A(statement(about(how(things(work(to(produce(an(outcome.((o Problem:(Finding(or(identifying(the(criminal(justice(theory(is(the(complexity(of(the(subject.((o Approaches(to(study(criminal(justice:( Disciplinary(• Each(discipline(contains(as(least(an(implicit(theory(of(what(“causes”(or(explains(criminal(justice.((• A(branch(of(study(or(learning(• Multidisciplinary(• Interdisciplinary(( Comparison(• Establish(standards(to(which(actual(practices(of(justice(agencies(or(an(entire(justice(system(are(compared.((o Ex:(Suggested(by(packer,(through(the(application(of(“ideal(types”(of(justice(systems( Crime(control(model'(operate(on(a(presumption(of(guilt.( Due(Process(model:(vigorously(protects(human(rights.(( Process(• Focuses(on(case(processing.(o Focus’s(less(on(the(outcome(and(more(on(how(the(system(“runs.”(( Best(Ex:(the(American(Bar(Foundation(( Thematic(• Compares(different(points(or(aspects(of(the(justice(process(with(each(other.((o Based(on(the(various(decisions(that(comprise(the(justice(system.(( The(focus(is(on(the(characteristics(of(the(decision.(( Systems(analyses(of(criminal(justice.((• Views(the(criminal(justice(process(as(a(whole(comprising(the(separate,(but(interrelated,(parts(of(law(enforcement,(courts(and(corrections.((o These(work(together(to(achieve(the(goal(of(crime(control(in(our(society.((o “The(big(picture”'(being(more(concerned(with(how(their(units(of(study(fit(into(a(larger(environment.(( “System”'(a(set(or(collection(of(interrelated(parts(working(together(to(achieve(a(common(goal.((o Choosing(an(approach:(The(book(relies(on(the( systems- appr oach(because(of(its(flexibility.((***( Other(approaches(can(be(too(restrictive.((• Systems(approach(is(broad(enough(to(allow(the(analyst(to(employ(any((or(all)(of(the(other(perspectives(within(it.(Flexible(enough(to(include(many(different(disciplinary(backgrounds.((o Forces(the(analyst(to(remember(that(many(factors(influence(each(decision.((o Provides(a(“picture(window”(through(which(to(view(criminal(justice.(( Systems(theory(and(the(systems(approach:((• Systems(cannot(be(beaten(because(it(reacts(and(adapts(to(maintain(normal(functioning.(( The(System(of(Criminal(Justice:(• Systems(theory(is(sensitive(to(the(interdependency(of(the(part(of(the(entire(process.((o Walker((1992)(observed(that(the(systems(perspective(is(the(dominant(scientific(paradigm(of(criminal(justice.((o Paradigm(for(understanding(criminal(justice:(( Criminal(Justice(is(complex,(involving(much(more(than(law(enforcement( The(role(of(the(police,(as(a(result,(is(also(very(complex,(involving(more(than(crime(control.(( The(administration(of(justice(is(largely(discretionary( Discretionary(decisions(are(not(well(controll ed( by(law(or(formal(rules.(( The(agencies(of(criminal(justice(are(interrelated(and(form(a(system.((o Types(of(Systems:(( For(our(purposes,(we(need(to(only(differentiate(from(“open”(and(“closed”(systems.((• Open(Systems:(o Sensitive(to(its(environment.((• Closed(Systems:(Often(self(contained(( General(systems(theory(includes(concepts(of(the(whole(system,(of(the(total(system(and(of(subsystems.(• The(whole(system(comprises(everything.((• Each(system(is(composed(of(various(parts(o Subsystems:(A(full(system(that(is(a(component(of(a(larger(system.((o The(nonsystem(of(Criminal(Justice:(( Robin((1984)(classified(criticisms(of(the(systems(approach(to(criminal(justice(into(four(categories(• Jurisdictional(problems(• Differences(in(roles(and(goals(• Differenced(in(personnel(• Substantive(issues((o Criminal(justice(is(not(a(“model”(system.(( Crime(control(is(a(manifest(function(or(goal(of(each(agency.((• The(criminal(Justice(process(is(an(OPEN(SYSTEM.((


View Full Document

FSU CCJ 2020 - Criminal Justice Perspectives

Documents in this Course
Exam 3

Exam 3

13 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

19 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

13 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

18 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

6 pages

Police

Police

51 pages

Exam I

Exam I

22 pages

EXAM 3

EXAM 3

20 pages

Chapter 7

Chapter 7

27 pages

EXAM 1

EXAM 1

23 pages

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

13 pages

Notes

Notes

66 pages

Chapter	1

Chapter 1

13 pages

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

13 pages

Load more
Download Criminal Justice Perspectives
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Criminal Justice Perspectives and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Criminal Justice Perspectives 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?