Unformatted text preview:

Travis- Chapter 1Criminal Justice Perspectives- Sociologists often speak of the purposes of social institutions as “functions.”o Functions: The goals served by a social institution. Ex: Schools serve the functions of education- Manifest Functions: The stated purposes of the institution.o Ex: Schools serve the manifest function of education through teaching students various academic subjects. - Latent Functions: The unstated or hidden goals. o Ex: providing child care and controlling the workforce by otherwise occupying millions of young people. - Social Control: The label given to the processes and structures that seek to limit rule-breaking behavior, or deviance. o Most discussions of social control attempt to classify the different means by which conformity is achieved. - Types of social control: o Formal social control:  Includes those sanctions applied by some authorized body after a public finding of fault. o Informal Social Control:  Refers to mechanisms that influence behavior without the needfor public finding of fault or the use of group; “authorized” sanctions. - Criminal Justice as a social control: o The primary function of criminal justice is social control. o The components: police, courts and corrections.  Manifest functions: controlling different kinds of deviance defined as crime. - Most social control works through informal mechanisms. o Criminal Justice- The formal institution designed to respond to deviance defined as crime.  Crime control is the primary purpose of the criminal justice system, but also serves as other latent functions. - In general, the criminal justice process is a formal social control mechanism- The basic social control took available to agents of the criminal justice process is “group-authorized” punishment. o Community Justice: An approach to social control as it sees the criminal process as an integral part of other community institutions.  “Crime is a symptom of problems in communities- The “Comprehensive Communities Program”- 1994.o Based on the principles that communities must take a leadership role in combating crime and violenceo Perspectives on Criminal Justice Criminal Justice has frequently been accused of being “atheoretical” or lacking a unifying perspective or set of perspectives in which operations of criminal justice agents can be understood. - They say criminal justice has not yet achieved theoretical integrity and coherence. o Criminal Justice Theory:  Theory: A logical explanation of something. - A statement about how things work to produce an outcome. o Problem: Finding or identifying the criminal justice theory is the complexity of the subject. o Approaches to study criminal justice: Disciplinary- Each discipline contains as least an implicit theory of what “causes” or explains criminal justice. - A branch of study or learning- Multidisciplinary- Interdisciplinary  Comparison- Establish standards to which actual practices of justice agencies or an entire justice system are compared. o Ex: Suggested by packer, through the application of “ideal types” of justice systems Crime control model- operate on a presumption of guilt. Due Process model: vigorously protects human rights.  Process- Focuses on case processing.o Focus’s less on the outcome and more on how the system “runs.”  Best Ex: the American Bar Foundation  Thematic- Compares different points or aspects of the justice process with each other. o Based on the various decisions that comprise thejustice system.  The focus is on the characteristics of the decision. Systems analyses of criminal justice. - Views the criminal justice process as a whole comprising the separate, but interrelated, parts of law enforcement, courts and corrections. o These work together to achieve the goal of crime control in our society. o “The big picture”- being more concerned with how their units of study fit into a larger environment.  “System”- a set or collection of interrelated parts working together to achieve a common goal. o Choosing an approach: The book relies on the systems approach because of its flexibility. *** Other approaches can be too restrictive. - Systems approach is broad enough to allow the analyst to employ any (or all) of the other perspectives within it. Flexible enough to include many different disciplinary backgrounds. o Forces the analyst to remember that many factors influence each decision. o Provides a “picture window” through which to view criminal justice.  Systems theory and the systems approach: - Systems cannot be beaten because it reacts and adapts to maintain normal functioning.  The System of Criminal Justice:- Systems theory is sensitive to the interdependency of the part of the entire process. o Walker (1992) observed that the systems perspective is the dominant scientific paradigm of criminal justice. o Paradigm for understanding criminal justice:  Criminal Justice is complex, involving much more than law enforcement The role of the police, as a result, is also very complex, involving more than crime control.  The administration of justice is largely discretionary Discretionary decisions are not well controlled by law or formal rules.  The agencies of criminal justice are interrelated and form a system. o Types of Systems:  For our purposes, we need to only differentiate from “open” and “closed” systems.- Open Systems:o Sensitive to its environment. - Closed Systems: Often self contained  General systems theory includes concepts of the whole system, of the total system and of subsystems.- The whole system comprises everything. - Each system is composed of various partso Subsystems: A full system that is a component of a larger system. o The nonsystem of Criminal Justice:  Robin (1984) classified criticisms of the systems approach to criminal justice into four categories- Jurisdictional problems- Differences in roles and goals- Differenced in personnel- Substantive issues o Criminal justice is not a “model” system.  Crime control is a manifest function or goal of each agency. - The criminal Justice process is an OPEN SYSTEM.  The environment of criminal justice is both material and ideological. - Material: money, personnel, equipment and the like. - Ideological: Comprises chiefly of values and beliefs about how the process should operate. o Each system has three stages: Input Throughput


View Full Document

FSU CCJ 2020 - Chapter 1

Documents in this Course
Exam 3

Exam 3

13 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

19 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

13 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

18 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

6 pages

Police

Police

51 pages

Exam I

Exam I

22 pages

EXAM 3

EXAM 3

20 pages

Chapter 7

Chapter 7

27 pages

EXAM 1

EXAM 1

23 pages

Notes

Notes

66 pages

Chapter	1

Chapter 1

13 pages

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

13 pages

Load more
Download Chapter 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Chapter 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Chapter 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?