Slide 1Interdependence TheoryRewardsCostsOutcomes2 Issues…Comparison LevelsSlide 8Quality of AlternativesThe Combined Effect of CL and Quality of AlternativesThe Investment ModelSlide 12The Concept of InequityEmotions and BehaviorsDealing with Distress in Inequitable RelationshipsGetting a Fair DealInterdependence and EquityInterdependence TheoryThrough communication and the exchange of resources, relational partners become interdependent.People are motivated to be in relationships that provide them with high levels of rewards and low levels of costs.RewardsRewards are positive consequences of being in a relationshipemotional: positive affect when with partner social: being able to meet cool people or being seen as cool yourselfinstrumental: partner helps accomplish tasksopportunity: positive life experiences gained from being in the relationshipCostsCosts are the negative consequences of being in a relationshipemotional: negative affect when with partner social: dealing with not-cool people or being seen as not-cool yourselfinstrumental: partner prevents tasks from being accomplished or creates more workopportunity: life experiences given up for the sake of the relationshipOutcomesThe outcome refers to the overall level of “profit” or “deficit” in relationshipsThe outcome equals rewards minus costs.Outcome = Rewards - CostRelationships are generally rewarding when outcomes are positive, and generally costly when outcomes are negative2 Issues…A single reward or cost can outweigh other rewards and costsTrying to quantify can be very difficultComparison LevelsThe comparison level is based your expectations for the outcome (how rewarding or costly do you expect your relationship to be).CL can also be thought of as a “standard” by which people evaluate their relationships.Outcome minus CL= SatisfactionWhen the outcome meets or exceeds the CL, people are satisfied.When the outcome falls under the CL, people are dissatisfied.Quality of AlternativesQuality of Alternatives refers to the expectations people have about the kind of outcomes they could have in an alternative situationPoor alternatives are related to more commitmentGood alternatives are related to less commitmentThe Combined Effect of CL and Quality of Alternatives Alternatives Are: Poor GoodThe Relationship:Meets or Exceeds CLFails to Meet CLSatisfied and CommittedSatisfied but UncommittedDissatisfied but CommittedDissatisfied and UncommittedThe Investment ModelThe investment model is an extension of interdependence theory.Investments are unrecoverable inputs that individuals deposit into relationshipsIntrinsic investments: resources put directly into the relationship (time, effort)Extrinsic investments: resources developed over time as a result of being in the relationship (possessions, social networks)The Concept of InequityWhen one partner is getting a “worse deal” in comparison to the other partner, there is inequity.Under-benefited: person getting the worse dealOver-benefited: person getting the better dealEmotions and BehaviorsEquity leads to feelings of happiness, satisfaction, fairness, and appreciationUnder-benefited inequity leads to feelings of frustration, anger, disappointment, and dissatisfaction.Over-benefited inequity can lead to feelings of guilt.Dealing with Distress in Inequitable RelationshipsThe more inequity, the more distress for both partners.People can relieve their distress by:1. 2.
View Full Document