DOC PREVIEW
TAMU COMM 315 - CH 5 IC Article.2

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

February 18Intercultural Communication: Hofstede’s Cultural DimensionsHofstede’s Value Dimensions One of the earliest attempts to use statistics to measure cultural values Surveyed over 100,000 managers in a multinational organization from 50 countries After analysis, ranked the countries from 1 to 50 on four dimensions:  Individualism vs. Collectivism High Uncertainty Avoidance vs. Low Uncertainty Avoidance High Power Distance vs. Low Power Distance Masculine vs. FeminineIndividualism vs. CollectivismIndividualism The individual is the single most important component of society Stress independence over dependence Individual achievement is rewarded Uniqueness of individual is valued US, Australia, Great Britain, New ZealandCollectivism The group is the most important component of society Emphasis is on collaboration rather thancompetition Don’t stand out. One should sacrifice for the group One’s identity stems directly from the in-groupHigh vs. Low Uncertainty AvoidanceHigh Uncertainty Avoidance Avoid by establishing rules for members Do not tolerate deviant ideas Seek consensus Believes more in absolute truths Portugal, Greece, Peru, JapanLow Uncertainty Avoidance More easily accept uncertainty as a wayof life Are not as threatened by different people or ideas Dislike structure associated with hierarchy Like fewer rules Great Britain, Jamaica, Sweden, USHigh vs. Low Power DistanceHigh Power Distance Power and authority are facts of life Everybody has a rightful place Superiors considers subordinates to be different from them Inequality become institutionalized India, Brazil, Mexico, SingaporeLow Power Distance Guided by laws and norms that intentionally minimize power distinctions All people should have access to power People are equals New Zealand, US, IsraelMasculine vs. FeminineMasculine Highly defined gender roles Promote career success Assertiveness is valued Acquisition is valued over interpersonal relationships Japan, Italy, MexicoFeminine Men do not need to be assertive and can assume nurturing roles. People and the environment are important Promotes sexual equality Interdependence is the ideal Sweden, Norway, FinlandBrainstorm What might be some criticisms of Hofstede’s work? Outdated due to ___________ Look at the majority of the ________ culture without considering how ______________ societies might influence statistics Managers w/i one organization ◦ Managers◦ One organization


View Full Document

TAMU COMM 315 - CH 5 IC Article.2

Download CH 5 IC Article.2
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view CH 5 IC Article.2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view CH 5 IC Article.2 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?