FSU MMC 2000 - Scientific Study of Media Effects

Unformatted text preview:

Scientific Study of Media Effects, Continued from April 10, 2014 – April 17, 2014o Inhibitory and disinhibitory effects of media  Media content can either support/reinforce those social sanctions or violate those social sanctions. - In regards to violence, shows like CSI, Criminal Minds, Cops support those social sanctions and reinforce the idea that crime doesn’t pay, thatcriminals are punished, that you should not act aggressively because you will put yourself and others in harm’s way. These are inhibitory effects – people who watch them are further inhibited from studying violence. All of this should lead to a decrease in violent actions, further inhibiting desires to be aggressive - But, in adult shows, sometimes the most attractive characters are the ones who are acting violently – these are often called antihero narratives. For example, Dexter, Game of Thrones, Mad Men, Bonnie and Clyde. These characters are the good people, the ones the audience is supposed to like. Violence is shown to sometimes be all right, to pay sometimes, to be beautiful or amusing or useful. These portrayals, which depict social sanctions as being impotent, wrong, and useless, might increase the likelihood that people will act violently in reality. These are disinhibitory effects – people who watch these shows are disinhibited from following social sanctions about violence. - The problem with media violence is not the presence of violence in general but the context in which it is found – are the portrayals supporting or undercutting thesocial sanctions? o This is especially applicable to children – when they consume media that undercut the social sanctions, they may become confused and think that violence is okay because some media are showing them that it is. Mixed messages about violence in media are what can have negative effects, especially in regards to children. o Children usually cannot differentiate the idea of fantasy from reality before about the age of eight. This increases the potential for violent portrayals to have an impact on children, even if they are depicted in an especially fictitiousmanner, like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles fighting someone else for good. - A third theory is called “cultivation.”o Stories are important in all culture – why? Narratives are the way that we see the world – our lives have a beginning, middle, and end. .  Stories teach morals and values.  Important things are filled with stories – religious texts are filled with stories, history is all one big story.  Grandparents, friends tell stories all the time.  Stories are how we gain our understanding of the world. We learn so many social sanctions, thoughts about what we should do with our lives through stories.  Because of all these factors, people who control stories control everything else in the world. o What are some of the “stories” in our culture? Most stories have a basic set-up of good versus evil.  Biblical stories – Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel – all teach moral lessons. Rags to riches stories – especially “the American dream”- How America was founded, the idea of manifest destiny and individual freedoms. Anyone can be successful – America is “the land of opportunity.” Tales about the expectations for the way lives are “supposed” to play out –graduate from high school, go to college, get a job and get married, have children, retire…no deviation from social norms. o How do these stories get passed on? Family and friends – stories read to us from books that convey to us a sense of how the world works, stories that are told orally at parties and gathering  Formal education Religion/religious institutions  MEDIA – especially over the past fifty years, media has become an increasingly dominant way of passing on stories in society. - In the 1960s, television started to be examined as another socializing factor in society, since by then there were people who had grown up with it. - A researcher named George Gerbner and his students argued that TV was the chief storyteller in our society. They said that because of the ubiquity of television (everyone was watching the same thing back then, since there were only three channels) and because people watchedmore television than they spent time learning about society at school, inreligious institutions, and from their families and friends. o So, how similar are the images on television to those things that exist in the real world?  They quickly came to the conclusion that it wasn’t that representative – the real world doesn’t look much like television for the most part. - For example – shows like Friends, Two Broke Girls – people with thosekinds of jobs would not be able to afford the places that they live in on the shows. - On crime drama shows, more than 60% of all the crimes that are portrayed are murder – in the real world, less than .1% of all crimes thatoccur are murder. - On shows that portray the business world, like Mad Men, drinking two martinis at lunch supposedly can lead people to be the best and mostenergetic presenters in their company. In real life, this would probably just lead to people falling asleep or being off during their presentation. o So, the cultivation theory concludes that TV (or media in general) does not equal the real world. o The cultivation hypothesis states that viewing the overall pattern of TV over time can lead otherwise diverse populations to hold similar views of reality. o Cultivation also suggests that this is not a today versus tomorrow kind of things – the people who watch the overall pattern of television over time beginto see the world in a similar way, even though otherwise we would expect them to be very different because they are from different places, different families, different backgrounds. We find that people don’t have such a varied sense of the world because stories we learn on television and from media wash away some of the differences we have. o What has been found? There are differences between “heavy” and “light” viewers (most of this research has been done on television, hence the use of the word “viewers”)- The people who watch more TV and consume more media are more affected than those who watch/consume less.  Mainstreaming effect - Example: gender-role stereotypes, like pink is for girls and blue is for boys; women stay home and take care of kids while men


View Full Document

FSU MMC 2000 - Scientific Study of Media Effects

Documents in this Course
People

People

9 pages

Chapter 3

Chapter 3

17 pages

Test 3

Test 3

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

17 pages

Film

Film

11 pages

EXAM 2

EXAM 2

17 pages

TEST 3

TEST 3

17 pages

QUIZ 8

QUIZ 8

48 pages

Video

Video

4 pages

Internet

Internet

10 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

4 pages

Chapter 7

Chapter 7

23 pages

Unit	3

Unit 3

21 pages

Test 2

Test 2

14 pages

Writing

Writing

41 pages

Exam #1

Exam #1

20 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

17 pages

Load more
Download Scientific Study of Media Effects
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Scientific Study of Media Effects and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Scientific Study of Media Effects 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?