DOC PREVIEW
UNT MGMT 3720 - Chapter 14 Conflict and Negotiation

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 6 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 6 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Conflict: A process that begins when one party perceives another party has or is about to negatively affect something the first party cares about.Incompatibility of goals-Differences over interpretation of facts-Disagreements based on behavioral expectations-Definition of ConflictTraditional view: One school of thought has argued that conflict must be avoided. Conflict was views negatively and discussed with terms as violence, destruction, and irrationality to reinforce its negative connotation.-Conflict results from poor commu, lack openness and trust b/w people, and failure of managers to be responsive to the needs and aspiration of their employees.-ALL conflict should BE ELIMINATED-Interactionist view: The view where perspective proposes that conflict can be a positive force in the group and some conflict can allow the group to perform effectively.Encourages conflict on the grounds that a harmonious, peaceful, tranquil, and cooperative group is prone to becoming static, apathetic, and unresponsive to needs for change and innovation. -RECOGNIZE that a minimal level of conflict can help keep a group viable, self-critical, and creative.-Conflict can STIMULATE active discussion without spillin over into negative, disruptive emotions is incompltere-Functional conflict: supports the goals of the group and improves its performance and thus a constructive form of conflict.-Dysfunctional/destructive conflict: a conflict that hinders group performance-Task conflict: a conflict relating to the content and goals of the work.-Relationship conflict: conflict that focuses on interpersonal relationships-Process conflict: conflict that relates on how the work gets done. (ALMOST always dysfunctional)-Why do they relate to each other? Friction and interpersonal hostilities increases personality clashes and decrease mutual understanding a.Low process conflict and low/moderate task conflict CAN be functional only in specific cases-Task conflicts are disruptive like relationship conflicts-Groups performing routine tasks that don't require creativity wont benefit from task conflict.-Task conflicts are related increase performance only when all members believe the team is a safe place for taking risks and that members will not deliberately undermine or reject those who speak up.-Managed conflict view: Resolving naturally occurring conflicts productively.Recognizes conflict is inevitable in most orgs and focuses more on productive conflict resolution-Resolution-Focused View of ConflictWorkplace conflicts are not produtive, they take time away from job tasks or interacting with customers.-Increased relationship conflicts = increased task conflict = lower levels of team performance and satisfaction.-Conflicts produce stress, and reduction in trust and cooperation-Transitions in Conflict ThoughtResolving cross-cultural begins by addressing emotional and identity-based concerns and -Chapter 14: Conflict and NegotiationWednesday, April 15, 201510:54 PM Org Behavioral Page 1Resolving cross-cultural begins by addressing emotional and identity-based concerns and building bonds b/w parties through common interests.-Conflict process: 5 stages: potential opposition/incompatibility, cognition and personalization, intentions, behavior, and outcomesStage 1: Potential Opposition or IncompatibilityCommunicationa.Differing word connotations, jargon, insufficient exchange of info, noise of communication channel are BARRIERS-Too little or too much communication can increase potential conflict-Structureb.Variables such as size of the group, degree of specialization in the tasks assigned to group members, jurisdictional clarity, member-goal compatibility, leadership styles, reward systems, and degree of dependence b/w groups-Size and specialization can stimulate conflict.-The larger the group and the more specialized its activities = likelihood of conflict-Personal variablesc.Personality, emotions, and values-People high in personality traits of disagreeableness, neuroticism, or self-monitoring are prone to other people and react poorly to conflict-Conflict ProcessStage II: Cognition and PersonalizationPerceived conflict: awareness by one or more parties of the existence of conditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise.-Felt conflict: emotional involvement in a conflict that creates anxiety, tenseness, frustration, or hostility-WEHERE CONFLICT ISSUES tend to be defined, where parties decide what the conflict is about.-Emotions play a major role in shaping perception.-Negative emotions = oversimplify issues, lose trust, and put negative interpretations on the other party's behavior-Positive feelings increase our tendency to see potentional relations among elements of a problem, take broader view of the situation, develop more innovative solutions.-Stage III: IntentionsIntentions: Decisions to act in a given way.-Intervene b/w people's perceptions and emotions and their overt behavior-Cooperativeness: the degree to which one party attempts to satisfy the other party's concerns-Assertiveness: the degree to which one party attempts to satisfy his or her own concerns-Competing: a person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on - Org Behavioral Page 2Competing: a person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties. (assertive and uncooperative)-Collaborating: a situation in which the parties to a conflict each desire to satisfy fully the concerns of all parties (assertive and cooperative)-Avoiding: the desire to withdraw from or suppress a conflict with whom you disagree. (unassertive and uncooperative)-Accommodating: the willingness of one party in a conflict to place the opponent's interest above his or her own. (unassertive, accommodating)-Compromising: the willingness to ration the object of the conflict and accept a solution that provides in complete satisfaction of both parties' concerns. (midrange assertive and accommodating)-Stage IV: BehaviorConflicts become visible-Includes statements, actions, and rxns made by the conflicting parties-A DYNAMIC PROCESS OF INTERACTION-Conflict management: the use of resolution and stimulation techniques to achieve the desired level of conflict-Stage V: OutcomesFunctional outcomesa.Conflict is constructive when it improves the quality of decisions, stimulates creativity and - Org Behavioral Page 3Conflict is constructive when it improves the quality of


View Full Document

UNT MGMT 3720 - Chapter 14 Conflict and Negotiation

Download Chapter 14 Conflict and Negotiation
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Chapter 14 Conflict and Negotiation and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Chapter 14 Conflict and Negotiation 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?