DOC PREVIEW
UT Arlington PSYC 1315 - Social Loafing

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSYC 1315 1st Edition Lecture 29Last LectureSocial Psychology Current Lecture Social Psychology How to change people’s attitudes? Main elements: ◦The communicator (source)Trustworthy? Credible? Likeable? Powerful? ◦The messageFoot-in-the-door vs. Door-in-the-face ◦The mediumTelevision vs. Newspaper ◦The target (audience)  Age and attitude Persuasion Elaboration likelihood model Two routes:◦Central (Deep) focus on the message Sound, logical argument ◦Peripheral (Surface) Unmotivated or unable to process Sources credibility is based attractiveness or emotional appealsAltruism An unselfish interest in helping someone else ◦Donations, volunteering, etcEgoism: ◦Giving to another person to ensure reciprocity; to gain self-esteem; to present oneself as powerful/caring; to avoid failing to live up to society’s expectations Empathy: ◦When we feel a oneness with the emotional state of another The bystander effect Reluctance to come to the aid of a person in need when other people are present 1964: Kitty Genovese Research example: ◦Fake seizure study Diffusion of Responsibility -  Assumption that others have already or will help -  Our sense of responsibility spreads out to all the individuals present -  Example: CPR - Aggression - Biological Influences:◦Evolutionary views, Genetic basis, Neurobiological - factorsPsychological Factors: - ◦Frustrating and Aversive circumstances, Cognitive factors, Observational learning- Sociocultural Factors:◦Media violence, Cultural norms - Conformity - A change in a person’s behavior to coincide more closely with a group standard - Research example:◦Asch (1951): “simple perception study” - Conformity - Depends on:◦Group size (somewhat) and unanimity - ◦Informational social influence:Influenced by others because we want to be right - ◦Normative social influence - Influenced by others because we want to be liked and approved of Deindividuation-  When being a part of a group reduces personal identity and erodes the sense of personal responsibility -  Become less accountable for actions, less self- conscious, more anonymous - Social Contagion - Imitative behavior involving the spread of behavior, emotions, and ideas - Ever wonder why when one baby cries, they all cry? - Social facilitation - Improvement in an individual’s performance because of the presence of others - Research examples: ◦Fishing line reeling, - eating, driving◦Does this work with - animals too? - Social Loafing- Tendency to put out less effort when working in a group compared to working alone - Research examples:◦Cheering while being blindfolded - Ways to alleviate:◦Meaningful task, point out individual


View Full Document

UT Arlington PSYC 1315 - Social Loafing

Download Social Loafing
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Social Loafing and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Social Loafing 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?