DOC PREVIEW
USC CSCI 577 - Evaluation_of_DC(TRR)Package

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Evaluation of DC (2 semester project)/TRR (1semester project) PackageOff-CampusHomework Total Points: 20+ PointsHomework Due Date: December 14, 2009The purpose of this assignment is to train the IIV&Vers to evaluate their team’sDC/TRR Package.Questions? Send email to [email protected] 1. (3 points) Please input the comments from DCR ARB into the Bugzilla andtrack them. Because this is the last package review, and make sure thatall the issues/defects (either from ARB or your own review) are closedbefore Dec 16 th .2. (2 points) Choose your process and give the rationales in“Rationale_for_ProcessChoice_F09a_TXX.doc”.- In your last package review, a Value-based IIVV Process is used.For this time’s package review, you are allowed to freely chooseeither Value-based IIVV Process or the previous reviewing process(Create Exit Criteria=> Review & Report=> Generate EvaluationReport=> Tracking) for your preference. You could give therationales based on the surveys we did before.3. (Not required, but if you tailor your reviewing very well and provide verygood rationale we could give your 3 additional points) Tailor your processaccording to your project’s context. - You are encouraged to tailor or make changes to the process youchoose according to your project’s context and situation too. Forexample, if you choose value-based process, some of youmentioned in the last survey that there are other factors that couldinfluence the Priority, like the “dependency among documents”. Youare encouraged to include these factors to get the “Priority”, youcould define the ratings by yourself and provide the rationale foreach rating. Another good point some of you mentioned in lastsurvey is that there might be different weight allocations for thefactors “Importance”, “Quality Risk” and “Cost”. You could assignthem different weights, but make sure you could provide aconvincing rationale according to your project’s context. Anyway,you could make any improvement on your reviewing process if youcould provide convincing evidence and rationales.- If you plan to tailor the process, please list the bullets of tailoringpoints and rationales in1/14/2019 @ 12:14 AM Page 1 of 3Evaluation of DC (2 semester project)/TRR (1semester project) PackageOff-Campus“Process_Tailoring_DC/TRR_F09a_TXX.doc” and it could be of anyformat.4. (10 points) Review, Tracking and Effort Report- You will do your last package review following the process youchoose and tailor.5. (5 points) Issues/Defects Statistics Report for the Whole Semester in“Issue/Defects_Statistics_Report_F09a_TXX.doc”- It should be based on the whole semester’s issues/defects- At least, the content of the report should include: o Overall statistics: how many issues/defects are reported,how many are closed, how many are still open…o Provide the Distribution of defects based on Phases: at eachphase (Evaluation, Foundation, Development), How manyissues/defects are introduced? How many issues/defects areremoved?o Provide the Distribution of defects based on Severity- It could be of any format, you could use any charts like some of youdid in ARB presentationThe Deliverables:1) “Rationale_for_ProcessChoice_F09a_TXX.doc”. It could be of any format2) “Process_Tailoring_DC/TRR_F09a_TXX.doc” if have, and it could be ofany format3) “Issue/Defects_Statistics_Report_F09a_TXX.doc”4) If you choose Value-based IIVV Process: Turn in additionally:- “VbIIVV_DC/TRR_F09a_TXX.xls”, you don’t need do surveys for this package review- “RER_DC/TRR_F09a_TXX_FirstName_LastName_VX.X.xls”5) If you choose the previous reviewing process: Turn in additionally - Each of your Exit Criteriaa. File name configuration: i. “OCD_DC/TRR_ExitCriteria_IIVV_F09a_TXX_FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” 1/14/2019 @ 12:14 AM Page 2 of 3Evaluation of DC (2 semester project)/TRR (1semester project) PackageOff-Campusii. “LCP_DC/TRR_ExitCriteria_IIVV_F09a_TXX__FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” iii. “FED_DC/TRR_ExitCriteria_IIVV_F09a_TXX__FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” ……- Each of your DC/TRR Evaluation Reportsb. File name configuration: i. “OCD_DC/TRR_Evaluation_IIVV_F09a_TXX__FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” ii. “LCP_DC/TRR_Evaluation_IIVV_F09a_TXX__FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” iii. “FED_DC/TRR_Evaluation_IIVV_F09a_TXX__FirstName_LastName_VX.X.doc” …….- “RER_DC/TRR_F09a_TXX_FirstName_LastName_VX.X.xls” 1/14/2019 @ 12:14 AM Page 3 of


View Full Document

USC CSCI 577 - Evaluation_of_DC(TRR)Package

Documents in this Course
ec-04

ec-04

39 pages

CSep15

CSep15

37 pages

ec-24

ec-24

42 pages

ec-11

ec-11

42 pages

ep10

ep10

6 pages

ec-07

ec-07

51 pages

ec-02

ec-02

22 pages

Load more
Download Evaluation_of_DC(TRR)Package
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Evaluation_of_DC(TRR)Package and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Evaluation_of_DC(TRR)Package 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?