DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley BIOLOGY 1B - Lecture Notes

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 9 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lectures 1 & 2 Monday, November 2, 2009 & Wednesday, November 4, 2009 An example of the relevance of evolution today The usual story is that Alexander Fleming accidentally discovered penicillin; the story is that Fleming, working in St. Mary’s hospital in London, was working with a culture of Staphylococcus aureus, a pathogenic bacterium on which he was doing some research, when he noticed that it had become contaminated by a species of Penicillium. He noted that the mold was inhibiting the bacterial growth. He writes a paper on his finding in 1929, and the rest is history. The actual story is a little bit different. Fleming was searching for antibacterial agents as early as 1920, and was largely motivated by his World War I experience where he witnessed the deaths of many soldiers from septicemia (blood poisoning). In 1922 Fleming discovered lysozyme (an enzyme that lyses bacteria). In 1928, while researching staphylococci, he benefited from chance, and a well conditioned mind that was looking for agents that inhibited bacteria. His lab, evidently, was not a very orderly one, and cultures he worked on were often forgotten, and hence contaminated eventually. After returning from a month-long vacation, Fleming found many of his plates contaminated with a fungus. He noticed a zone of inhibition around the fungus. He thought he was on to something, and eventually isolated an extract from the mold that, by itself, could inhibit the growth of bacteria. He named the inhibitor ‘Penicillin’. By 1943, drug companies were mass-producing penicillin for the war effort. Thousands of lives were saved by this “miracle drug” over the course of the war. And of course, the lives of perhaps millions of people were saved by penicillin and related drugs after the war. For us, it is difficult to imagine living in dread of dying of a bacterial infection, of any kind. But, of course, this was not always the case. The last 50 years has been termed a golden age in medicine, mostly because of the better treatment of bacterial pathogens. 1943 marks the beginning of the antibiotic error. 1947, however, marks the beginning of the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. 1947 saw the first penicillin resistant pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus. By 1967 penicillin resistant pnemococci had surfaced and American military personnel in Southeast Asia were starting to bring home penicillin resistant gonorrhea. The response by the medical community was a natural and reasonable one. If penicillin doesn’t work as effectively, let’s find another antibiotic. The 1950’s saw chloramphenicol, neomycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, erythromycin and cephalosporins added to the list of antibiotics. The 1960’s saw the addition of several new aminoglycosides, but resistance to one aminoglycoside was often accompanied by resistance to other aminoglycosides. (An aminoglycoside acts by tightly binding to a structural component of the 30S ribosomal subunit to inhibit protein synthesis.) The 1970’s were bleak in terms of adding new antibiotics, but the 1980’s saw the addition of an important new class of antibiotics called the fluoroquinolones, of which Ciprofloxacinis probably the most familiar. (Fluoroquinolones inhibit gyrase in bacteria, which is an enzyme that is necessary to separate DNA during cell division.) Over the past 60 years, bacteria that are resistant to new drugs consistently appeared within a few years of the introduction of those drugs into clinical use. By 1994, researchers had identified in patient samples, bacteria that were simultaneous resistant to all currently available drugs. Why? First, the emergence of antibiotic resistance is an example of evolution. Biological evolution is the change over time of the traits of a species. The trait that the bacteria differ in is their individual resistance to antibiotics. Some bacteria are less susceptible than others to treatment by antibiotics. The observation is this: 60 years ago, antibiotics like penicillin were widely (in fact, wildly) successful at treating pathogenic bacteria. Today, those same drugs are less successful because the proportion of resistant bacteria “out there” has increased. Evolution in this sense is a statement of fact, not of theory. A fact is something that can be observed. We have observed (unfortunately) the evolution of antibiotic resistance in different bacterial species. We have also observed evolution in other species over longer periods of time, and have direct evidence in the forms of fossils that creatures in the past did not look like creatures alive today. Second, the evolution of traits such as antibiotic resistance is often caused by natural selection. This is one of the big ideas that Charles Darwin had. The idea is really simple: (1) Individuals within a population are variable. (2) The variations among individuals are, at least in part, passed from parents to offspring. That is to say, offspring resemble their parents. (3) In every generation, some individuals are more successful at surviving and reproducing. (4) The survival and reproduction of individuals are not random, and are tied to the variation among individuals. The individuals with the most favored variations, those who are better at surviving and reproducing, are naturally selected. Components of a successful theory of evolution: (1) The fact of evolution. We can observe that organisms change over time. (2) The pattern of evolution. How exactly do species change over time? Is the change abrupt, or do species change gradually? (3) The mechanism (process) of evolution. What causes species to change over time? Also, note that evolutionary biology is a historical science (it attempts to explain events that occurred in the past). It seems quite simple to explore the fact and pattern of evolution through direct observation, using, for example, the fossil record. However,establishing a mechanism is not so easy. In order to establish a mechanism that caused a historical event, one must make an assumption. The assumption is this: Processes we see acting today, also acted in the past. This is not a


View Full Document

Berkeley BIOLOGY 1B - Lecture Notes

Documents in this Course
Notes 1

Notes 1

4 pages

EVOLUTION

EVOLUTION

12 pages

Evolution

Evolution

12 pages

Load more
Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?