DOC PREVIEW
SJSU ENGR 100W - LAB ASSIGNMENT

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

ENGR 100W LAB ASSIGNMENT Dr. Thalia AnagnosENGR 100W LAB ASSIGNMENT Dr. Thalia AnagnosObjectives of Assignment:- Use the correct format for a memo.- Use your understanding of the scientific method to evaluate an earthquake prediction.- Develop and support an argument.- Cite sources and use quotes correctly.Background: Jim Berkland, a retired geologist, has developed the “seismic window” theory to predict earthquakes (Berkland, 2005). His theory is based on the alignment of the sun, Earth and moon (syzygy). Alignment of the sun, Earth, and moon, of course, occurs at new moon and full moon. He is particularly interested in the coincidence of perigee and syzygy. Perigee is the point in the moon’s orbit when it is closest to Earth. When perigee and syzygy coincide the tidal forces are particularly large, and he claims that an eight day seismic window opens in which earthquakes are more likely to occur. A seismic window happens about five times per year.Mr. Berkland maintains a web site (http://www.syzygyjob.com/) on which he posts his predictions and what happened during the previous seismic window. An example of his posting for the June 2008 seismic window is found on the next page. Needless to say, Berkland’s seismic window theory is highly controversial. He has a loyal fan base as well as a vocal group of critics.Assignment: Read the attached posting from Jim Berkland’s web site and make your own judgment aboutthe validity of his method. Use your knowledge of the scientific method, your understanding of the components of a prediction, and the data he provides to form your argument. THERE IS NO RIGHT ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT. I am looking for a solid argument supporting your conclusion based on the evidence you gather. The PowerPoint about earthquake prediction is found on the class web site www.engr.sjsu.edu/tanagnos/ENGR100W (click on Green Talk Speakers).Guidelines: The assignment must be turned in at the end of this class period and a copy MUST BE TURNED INTO TURNITIN.COM. The letter must be typed on the computer. Complete the memo with 12 point Times Roman font, 1 and ½ line spacing, and 1- inch margins. 1. Write a memo to Thalia Anagnos, Professor, stating your claim and your argument.2. Number your pages.3. Cite references in APA style.4. Include a “References” section at the end of your letter with properly formatted references.Proofread your document before you print it. Sign it at the top next to your name and hand it.Grading:Introduction of memo purpose and scope and the issue 3Clear stance and argument to support that stance 3Conclusions summarizing your argument 3References properly cited and plagiarism avoided 2Correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, memo format 4 Total 15 pointsReferencesBerkland, J. (2005). Who is Geologist Jim Berkland? Retrieved February 22, 2009, from http://www.syzygyjob.com/index.php?Itemid=27&id=13&option=com_content&task=viewPage 1ENGR 100W LAB ASSIGNMENT Dr. Thalia AnagnosThe following text is taken from Jim Berkland’s Earthquake Prediction Site http://www.syzygyjob.com/PREDICTIONS FOR JUNE The Seismic window of June 1-8, 2008 is based on the new Moon of June 3rd and the very close perigee just 8 hours earlier. The resultant high tides will peak out at a startling 9.0 ft. at Golden Gate on June 3-4, and 16.6 ft. at Puget Sound on June 5-6, 2008. I predict with 85% confidence that there will be one or more of the following earthquakes:1) 3.5-6.5M within 140 miles (2 degrees) of Mt. Diablo at 37.9N; 121.9W. 2) 3.5-6.5M within 140 miles of Los Angeles at 34.0N; 118.0W.3) 3.5-5.5M with an epicentral address of Washington or Oregon.4) 7.0M= major quake globally, probably within the Pacific Ring of fire, where most large quakes hit.LAST MONTH’S EARTHQUAKESThe Seismic Window of June 1-8th was replete with earthquakes, many in unusual places. All it lacked was a 7.0+M quake, but close to the minimum score was the 6.6M quake in Southern Greece that killed at least two people and injured hundreds. It hit on the last day of the June Window. No major quakes occurred in the world since the 7.9-8.0M Chinese quake on the last day of the May Window. (As I complete this July Issue of SYZYGY the next major quake occurred, striking Honshu, Japan on June 13th.) The USGS determination of 6.8M would leave itjust 0.2M shy of major status. Let us examine what happened during the June Window compared with my predictions (1) There were widely felt quakes of 4.1 and 4.0M at The Geysers on May 29th. These were three days early for a score of 70%; however, on June 3rd an even more widely event was centered on the Green Valley Fault, southwest of Napa.It was felt by many people in Sonoma Valley, but I regret to say I missed it. I was at a lively dinner for docents at the Bouverie Nature Preserve when my earthquake belt indicator sounded and revealed that a 3.9M had struck about 30 miles away at 7:29 p.m. I happily announced to many in the crowd that the quake I had predicted in the newsletter I had just handed out had already struck. I called it "my kind of quake" not big enough to hurt, but big enough to grab your attention."(SCORE: 100%) for my 140 mile circle around Mt. Diablo. Just three days later there was another 100% hit right next to Mt. Diablo, when the town of Alamo (remember it) was jolted by a pair of quakes measuring 3.5 and 3.0M. The interrupted swarm at Verdi, Nevada resumed withjolts of 3.9 and 3.6M on June 8th, about 154 miles east of Mt. Diablo.They were worth 80-90% in my scoring system as they were ten percent beyond my 140 mile limit.2) For the Circle of interest around Los Angeles, there was a lot of minor activity, including a numerous swarm near the south end of the Salton Sea near a geothermal area. The largest of 3.2M on June 1st was good for a rating of 70%. The next days there were quakes of 3.0M (too weak to score) near El Centro and Idylwild; however, Mexicali came through with a 3.8M on June 7th for a score of 100%.3) There was no suspense regarding the Washington/Oregon prediction as a 4.7M shaker was Page 2ENGR 100W LAB ASSIGNMENT Dr. Thalia Anagnoscentered on the oceanic ridge off the coast of Oregon on June 1st.for a satisfying score of 100%. It would be just fine with me if all of the Pacific Coast quakes were less than 5.0M and stayed well to the west of the coastline.4) The prediction for a global quake of at least 7.0M


View Full Document

SJSU ENGR 100W - LAB ASSIGNMENT

Download LAB ASSIGNMENT
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view LAB ASSIGNMENT and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view LAB ASSIGNMENT 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?