COMM 1000 1nd Edition Lecture 9 Outline of Last Lecture I. Interpersonal CommunicationA. NormsB. RulesC. RolesII. Role ConflictIII. Interpersonal RelationshipsIV. Self-DisclosureA. Reciprocity and TrustB. Reasons for RevealingC. Reasons for ConcealmentD. AppropriatenessV. AttachmentA. Children’s Attachment StylesVI. MarriageVII. Marital StylesA. TraditionalsB. IndependentsC. SeparatesOutline of Current Lecture These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.VIII. Dialectical PerspectiveA. Autonomy vs. ConnectionB. Certainty vs. Uncertaintya. Psychological Trustb. Behavioral TrustC. Openness vs. ClosenessIX. Love StylesX. DominanceXI. Dominance in a RelationshipXII. PowerXIII. Proximity and Geographic ClosenessXIV.Proximity: Dating and WorkXV. AttractionXVI. Similarity Attracts, Not OppositesCurrent LectureDialectical Perspective:- Sets of opposing or contradictory impulses that create tension between two people.- Assumptions:o Contradiction is inherent in social lifeo These conflicts drive change and vitalityo There is dialectical change- Researchers study the effects of these dialectics on relational satisfaction- 3 main types:o Autonomy vs Connectiono Certainty vs Uncertaintyo Openness vs ClosenessAutonomy vs. Connection:- Independence vs. Interdependenceo Want to be connected with others, yet want to be autonomous.- One of the most powerful dialectics.- These needs are dynamic and frequently shifting.o Progression as you get oldero Want independence from your parentso If something bad or even exciting happens you want to be around people- Also tend to vary among individualso Negotiate to find something that is good for two peopleCertainty vs. Uncertainty:- We like predictability, but we also crave excitement.o Knowing that you’ll “be there” for me but alsoo Craving excitement. Things can get “too predictable” but too much chaos is also not comfortable.- Psychological trust—knowing how/what you think or- Behavioral trust—knowing how you’d actOpenness vs Closeness:- Openness is akin to sharing- How much we share is a dialectic- Dialectic scholars argue that true self-disclosure is relatively infrequent… “small talk” just for talks sake is also relationally significant.- How does this contrast with other theories in other windows?Love Styles:- Eros- Ludus- Storge- Pragma- Mania- AgapeDominance:- Need for control OVER others- In dyads, one often has more dominance than the other, but not always- Can coexist with affiliationDominance/Affiliation:High AffiliationLowDominanceAgreeAssistCooperateAdviseDirectLeadHighDominanceConcedeEvadeWithdrawAnalyzeCriticizeJudgeLow AffiliationDominance in a relationship:- Can be complementary-one up, one down- Symmetrical-both up or both down- Parallel-combination, varies by topicPower:- Unlike dominance- Power is GIVEN to you by others- Can’t get power unless others allow you to have it- EXAMPLE: “Do what I want, or I’m leaving”—dominance or power?o Dominance until someone gives in and they are giving powerChapter 8-Proximity and Geographic Closeness:- One is significantly more likely to marry someone geographically close - Explanations for proximity effect include:o If we know we will be physically close, we overlook the other’s less desirable traitso Opportunities for communication are greatero Familiarity in itself may increase liking- A number of factors associated with liking and romantic loveo Reciprocal likingo Desirability of other Attractiveness Power statuso Similarityo Exposure/social appropriatenesso Reciprocal liking and desirability may be most importantProximity: Dating and Work:- With respect to dating and worko (1) 35% of US adults have fantasized about a co workero (7) 16% of US men and 7% of US women reported having sex in the officeAttraction:- Birds of a feather flock together-similarity attract (definitely proven in research)- Dinosaurs of a different scale herd collected-opposites attractSimilarity Attracts, Not Opposites:- Assertive, mating, age, ethnic background, race, religion, socioeconomic status, and education- Psychological charactero Attitudeso Opinionso Worldviewso Verbal abilities- Tend to have similar levels of physical attractiveness and similar preferences in mates- Importance of attractiveness has increased in both males and females; it used to be more important for men- Mutual attraction and love is important for both sexes- Similarity attracts in non-romantic relationships also we like people who are like us, we dislike people who are different- Given enough knowledge, it is possible to predict who will become friends- Attraction paradigm- research suggests that if we think we are alike, our opinions will converge- We are more attracted to the other if we think we are alike- Perception elements lead us to overemphasize similarity and differences- Increasing numbers of interracial/interethnic couples in the US may indicate similarity in race/ethnicity may not be as important as they
View Full Document