Unformatted text preview:

Product LiabilityIntroductionIntroduction Cont….Slide 4Slide 5HistoryHistory Cont...Slide 8Product Safety LawsSlide 10Exempted ProductsProduct Liability LawsDefensesFinancial LossThe FuturePrevention ProgramOrganizational StructureNew-Product ReviewProduct Review TeamPowerPoint PresentationInitial Production ReviewWarranties, Advertisements, AgreementsWarning labels/InstructionsComplaints/ClaimsRetention of RecordsOther considerations…Slide 27Product LiabilityProduct LiabilityJacob BervigJacob BervigDonny MoberleyDonny MoberleySteve StaskiewiczSteve StaskiewiczIntroductionIntroductionCompetition causes premature release of products.Technical complexity has increased severity and frequency of injuries.50 million product accidents a year.Annual cost of $50 billion.Introduction Cont….Introduction Cont….Jury verdicts favor injured party.Sympathy vote.Manufacturers try to presume these costs and pass it on to the customer.Smaller companies forced into bankruptcy.Introduction Cont….Introduction Cont….Three main reasons for product injuries–Behavior or knowledge of product user.–Environment–Designed poorly, defective.Introduction Cont….Introduction Cont….Companies can not totally account for behavior or knowledge.Safety and quality must be engineered into the product.Manufacturers are able to see safest design better than product user.HistoryHistoryGrain producers were held liable for quality in ancient times.Quality was based on one sample.By fourteenth century textile sampling was common.Seals and official stamps were used.History Cont...History Cont...In the fourteenth century there product lawsuits.By the middle of the eighteenth century there were two concepts.–Caveat emptor (Let the buyer beware)–Privity of contractHistory Cont...History Cont...1916 MacPherson V. BuickBuick held negligent by failing to inspect defective wheel from supplier.Ended privity of contract and buyer beware.Product Safety LawsProduct Safety LawsConsumer Product Safety Act of 1972.Protect public against unreasonable injury.Assist in comparing safety of products.Develop uniform safety standards.Promote research and investigate product safety.Product Safety LawsProduct Safety LawsMany states and municipalities have their own laws.Similar laws–Refrigerator Safety Act–Flammable Fabrics ActExempted ProductsExempted ProductsCarsBoats AirplanesFoodDrugsCosmeticsTobacco and Poisons.Product Liability LawsProduct Liability LawsPlantiff must prove causation in every case.51% likely to have caused the injury.Proving defectiveness is the heart of most court cases.Warranties help limit liability.DefensesDefensesNegligenceAssumption of riskMisuseStatutes of Repose (useful life) 8,10, or 12 years.Financial LossFinancial LossDefendant losses more than money.Costs–Recalls, replacements, reputation, production delays, quality.The FutureThe FutureAsbestos, Dalkon shield, and Bendectin grow 4% each year.Synthetic and toxic products.Europe adopting strict liability laws.Prevention ProgramOrganizationNew-Product ReviewInitial Production ReviewPeriodic Production AuditsControl of Warranties, Advertisements, Agreements, etc.Warning Labels/InstructionsComplains/ClaimsRetention of RecordsProduct Recall PlanOrganizational StructureDependent on size & talentsSpecify responsibilitiesNecessary authorityProduct-safety committee-Legal-Design-Manufacturing-Marketing-Quality-Safety engineerNew-Product ReviewPrototypeFirst & least expensiveConsumer safety first–Function, cost, sales appeal secondWill product work under conditions that:1. Are adverse2. Have been considered abusive3. A plaintiff’s attorney will consider foreseeableProduct Review TeamProduct Review TeamNo preconceived notions about productEvaluate product’s compliance with:1. present and foreseeable standards2. Applicable codes, laws, and regulations3. Consumer requirements and anticipated use4. Past injury dataCrushing hazardsShearing hazardsCutting hazardsEntanglement haz.Drawing-in hazardsTrapping hazardsImpact hazardsPuncture hazardsAbrasion hazardsExposed live partThermo hazardsNoise hazardsExposure hazardsFire hazardsExplosion hazardsUnexpected start-up hazardsElectrostatic exposureInitial Production ReviewFirst production itemsLimited production runDetermine adequacy of factorsWarranties, Advertisements, AgreementsTerms & conditions are limited to statement of merchantabilityLegalists analyze all advertisingSpecial warranty provisions?Analysis of dealer distributorship/franchise agreement of “defective” itemsNonconformity (unit)Evaluation of cost problems of warrantiesWarning labels/InstructionsInadequate/nonexistent = negligenceEngineers are a no goSymbols and picturesWarning calls attention to dangerInstructions prescribe proceduresComplaints/ClaimsProduct safety engineer–Cause of complaint–Nature & seriousness of complain–Failure mode–Age of defect, present when sold?–Negligence of partiesThe quicker the betterRetention of RecordsShipment, operator, machine, time, etc.Expected useful life of product plus 18 years.Other considerations…Product-Recall planCustomer


View Full Document

EIU TEC 5133 - Product_Liability

Documents in this Course
FM

FM

20 pages

Load more
Download Product_Liability
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Product_Liability and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Product_Liability 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?