DOC PREVIEW
ISU PSYCH 280 - Reciprocation student

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1ReciprocationReciprocation1) RepaymentGiving to those who have given to youTwo forms of ReciprocationChristmas Card StudyPhil Kunz, a psychologist at Brigham Young University in Provo Utah sent 578 Christmas cards (signed “Joyce and Phil”) to strangers living in Chicago, Illinois. 117 (over 20%) sent a card in returnA significant number of return cards had notes or letters enclosedOnly 6 of the 117 people who returned a card said they could not remember themcpRepaymentDonationswithout giftDonationswithgift18% 35%RepaymentObligationGuiltEvolutionarily adaptiveReciprocation2) ConcessionsMake concession in return for concession made by anotherTwo forms of Reciprocation2ReciprocationWorks because:– 1st request makes 2nd request seem more moderate and acceptable– By making a 2nd, more moderate, request the requester appears to have made a concession, which makes other person feel obligated to make a reciprocal concessioncpTwo step procedure:1. Large request (get No!)2. Smaller request (get Yes!)ReciprocationDoor-in-the-FaceTechniqueCounty Youth Study: Cialdini et al. (1975)Independent variable: RequestExperimental group: “Would you be willing to serve as unpaid counselors to juvenile delinquents 2 hrs./wk for 2 years?”(inflated request)“No? Ok, would you be willing to serve as unpaid chaperons for juvenile delinquents on a day trip to the zoo?”(concession)Control group: Asked....“Would you be willing to serve as unpaid chaperons for juvenile delinquents on a day trip to the zoo?”cpCounty Youth Studycp0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Control Group Experimental Group% agreeing to go to zooDoor-in-the-Face TechniqueFactors that reduce its effectiveness:–Initial request too extreme–Request for selfish purposes–Delay between 1st and 2nd requestcpThat’s Not All TechniqueTwo step strategy:1. Inflated request2. Offer discount or bonus3Cupcake Sale: Burger (1986)3 Conditions:That’s Not All: •Cost per cupcake $1.25, then reduced to $1.00Bargain:•Cost per cupcake $1.00, had been $1.25Control:•Cost per cupcake $1.00cpCupcake Salecp0%10%20%30%40%50%60%That's Not All Bargain Control% who bought a


View Full Document

ISU PSYCH 280 - Reciprocation student

Documents in this Course
Lecture

Lecture

3 pages

Lecture

Lecture

5 pages

Load more
Download Reciprocation student
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Reciprocation student and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Reciprocation student 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?