DOC PREVIEW
UNCW BLA 361 - Camps Newfound case oyez summary

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. HarrisonDocket: 94-1988Citation: 520 U.S. 564 (1997)Petitioner: Camps Newfound/OwatonnaRespondent: HarrisonCase Media- Oral Argument - Written Opinion AbstractOral Argument: Wednesday, October 9, 1996 Decision: Monday, May 19, 1997Issues: Economic Activity, State TaxAdvocatesWilliam H. Dempsey(Argued the cause for the petitioner)William L. Plouffe (Argued the cause for the respondents)Facts of the CaseCamps Newfound/Owatonna Inc. (Camps) operates a children's church camp in Maine and finances itsoperations through a $400 per camper weekly tuition charge. The majority of its campers are out of state children. Maine's tax scheme exempts charitable institutions incorporated in the state, and provides a more limited tax benefit for institutions which principally benefit non-Maine residents so long as their weekly service charge does not exceed $30 per person. Ineligible for any exemptions, Camps challenged the constitutionality of Maine's tax exemption statute. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari following a reversal of a favorable Superior Court ruling by the Supreme Court of Maine.QuestionDid Maine's tax exemption statute violate the Commerce Clause?ConclusionYes. In a 5-to-4 opinion, the Court held that Maine's tax exemption statute violated the dormant commerce clause since it selectively awarded greater tax benefits to those institutions which served mostly state residents, while penalizing institutions that conducted mostly interstate business. By imposing such selective benefits on a commercial activity in which it did not directly participate, the Court found Maine's governmental tax regulations to be an unconstitutional form of economic protectionism favoring local consumers and business providers.Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (bySeniority)Sort by Ideology(More information here)Full Opinion: Economic Activity, State Tax: 5 - 4Rehnquist Stevens O'Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg BreyerCite this pageThe Oyez Project, Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (1997),available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_94_1988/>(last visited Monday, February 4,


View Full Document

UNCW BLA 361 - Camps Newfound case oyez summary

Documents in this Course
TWO PESOS

TWO PESOS

16 pages

Reading

Reading

13 pages

Russia

Russia

113 pages

Contracts

Contracts

55 pages

Property

Property

54 pages

Contracts

Contracts

45 pages

Load more
Download Camps Newfound case oyez summary
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Camps Newfound case oyez summary and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Camps Newfound case oyez summary 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?