DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley COMPSCI 160 - Lecture 19

This preview shows page 1-2-14-15-29-30 out of 30 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

CS 160: Lecture 19CSCW: Computer-Supported Cooperative WorkAsynchronous GroupwareWorkflowKnowledge repositoriesWither Email?Extensible Groupware: Lotus NotesSynchronous GroupwareVideoSoundTurn-taking, back-channelingBreakdownsUsage issuesSolutionsSlide 15Slide 16Solutions – Outpost (Berkeley)Outpost ImplementationBreakFace-to-Face: the ultimate?Slide 21Slide 22Grudin: Eight challengesSlide 24Slide 25Slide 26Beyond communicationCoordinatorCSCL: Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningSummary01/14/19 1CS 160: Lecture 19Professor John CannySpring 200301/14/19 2CSCW: Computer-Supported Cooperative WorkIts about tools that allow people to work together.Most of the tools support remote work*video, email, IM, WorkflowSome tools, e.g. Livenotes, augment local communication.01/14/19 3Asynchronous GroupwareEmail: still a killer appNewsgroups: topical messagingStructured messaging: e.g. Workflow – messages carry data, route automatically.Cooperative hypertext/hypermedia authoring: e.g. swikiKnowledge repositories: Answergarden, MadSciNet, Autonomy01/14/19 4WorkflowDocuments carry meta-data that describes their flow through the organization:*Document X should be completed by Jill by 4/15*Doc X should then be reviewed by Amit by 4/22*Doc X should then be approved by Ziwei by 4/29*Doc X should finally be received by Don by 5/4The document “knows” its route. With the aid of the system, it will send reminders to its users, and then forward automatically at the time limit.01/14/19 5Knowledge repositoriesAnswerGarden (Ackerman): database of commonly-asked questions that grows automatically. User poses question as a text query:*System responds with matches from the database.*If user isnt satisfied, system attempts to route query to an expert on the topic.*Expert receives query, answers it, adds answer to the database.01/14/19 6Wither Email?There is a lot of research on “Email++”*Automatic organization*Task management*Other functions: contacts, remindersMultimedia email: Can include sound, video, images. *But who really does this?01/14/19 7Extensible Groupware: Lotus NotesNotes is a product that combines standard office software (email, calendar, contacts etc.) with a scriptable database backend.Easy to create new apps: PERT charts, novel workflow, custom shared authoring…“most successful groupware system to date”01/14/19 8Synchronous GroupwareDesktop Conferencing (MS Netmeeting)Electronic Meeting Rooms (Access Grid)Media Spaces (Xerox PARC)01/14/19 9VideoEye contact problems:*Offset from camera to screen*“Mona Lisa” effect Gesture has similar problems: trying pointing at something across a video link.01/14/19 10SoundGood for one-on-one communication Bad for meetings. Spatial localization is normally lost. Add to network delays and meeting regulation is very hard.01/14/19 11Turn-taking, back-channelingIn a face-to-face meeting, people do a lot of self-management.Preparing to speak: lean forward, clear throat, shuffle paper.Unfortunately, these are subtle gestures which don’t pass well through today’s technology. Network delays make things much worse.01/14/19 12BreakdownsMisunderstandings, talking over each other, losing the thread of the meeting.People are good at recognizing these and recovering from them “repair”. Mediated communication often makes it harder.E.g. email often escalates simple misunderstandings into flaming sessions.01/14/19 13Usage issuesOur model of tele-communication is episodic, and derives from the economics of the telephone. Communication in the real world has both structured and unplanned episodes. Meeting by the Xerox machine.Also, much face-to-face communication is really side-by-side, with some artifact as the focus.01/14/19 14SolutionsSharing experiences is very important for mutual understanding in team work (attribution theory).So context-baseddisplays (portholes)work well. Video shows roomsand hallways, not just people or seats.01/14/19 15SolutionsProps (mobile presences) address many of these issues. They even support exploration.01/14/19 16SolutionsIshii’s Clearboard: sketching + presence01/14/19 17Solutions – Outpost (Berkeley)Post-it capture system for web site design.For collaboration, add pen traces and user shadows (to add awareness).01/14/19 18Outpost Implementation01/14/19 19Break01/14/19 20Face-to-Face: the ultimate?It depends.Conveys the maximum amount of information, mere presence effects are strong. But…People spend a lot of cognitive effort managing perceptions of each other.In a simple comparison of F2F, phone and email, most subjects felt most comfortable with the phone for routine communication.01/14/19 21Face-to-Face: the ultimate?Kiesler and Sproull findings:*Participants talk more freely in email (than F2F).*Participation is more equal in email.*More proposals for action via email. *Reduced effects of status/physical appearance.But*Longer decision times in email.*More extreme remarks and flaming in email.01/14/19 22Face-to-Face: the ultimate?Kiesler and Sproull found that email-only programming teams were more productive than email+F2F teams in a CS course. There you want coordination, commitment, recording. Conclusion: Match the medium to the mission01/14/19 23Grudin: Eight challenges1. Disparity between those who benefit from the App, and those who have to work on it.e.g. secretary uses calendars to schedule meeting, but others must maintain calendars.2. Critical mass, Prisoner’s Dilemma*Need full buy-in to automate scheduling, similarly with Lotus Notes.01/14/19 24Grudin: Eight challenges3. Disruption of social processes:*people are flexible, adaptive, opportunistic, improvisors, sometimes imprecise.4. Exception Handling:*People react to interruptions or exceptions and dynamically re-plan what to do. Most software doesn’t plan, so exception-handling must be anticipated and pre-programmed.01/14/19 25Grudin: Eight challenges5. Unobtrusive accessibility:*Group features should complement individual work functions, and be easily accessible6. Difficulty of evaluation:*Collaborators add uncertainty! Hard to isolate the parameters you want to study. WOZ can help.01/14/19 26Grudin: Eight challenges7. Failure of intuition:*Group processes (and social psychology) are often counter-intuitive. This leads to mistakes both by adopters and designers.8. The adoption


View Full Document

Berkeley COMPSCI 160 - Lecture 19

Documents in this Course
E-LEAGUE

E-LEAGUE

15 pages

iCurator

iCurator

10 pages

Project

Project

14 pages

E-Drink

E-Drink

10 pages

Load more
Download Lecture 19
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture 19 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture 19 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?