DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley COMPSCI 160 - Discussion Section

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1CS160 Discussion SectionMatthew KamApr 14, 2003Ethical Considerations• Sometimes tests can be distressing– users have left in tears (embarrassed by mistakes)• You have a responsibility to alleviate– make voluntary with informed consent– avoid pressure to participate– will not affect their job status either way– let them know they can stop at any time – stress that you are testing the system, not them– make collected data as anonymous as possible• Get human subjects approval if needed – typically if results are going to be published. Variable types• Independent Variables: the ones you control– Aspects of the interface design– Characteristics of the testers– Discrete: A, B or C– Continuous: Time between clicks for double-click• Dependent variables: the ones you measure– Time to complete tasks– Number of errorsDeciding on Data to Collect• Two types of data– process data• observations of what users are doing & thinking– bottom-line data• summary of what happened (time, errors, success…)• i.e., the dependent variablesSome statistics• Variables X & Y• A relation (hypothesis) e.g. X > Y• We would often like to know if a relation is true– e.g. X = time taken by novice users– Y = time taken by users with some training• To find out if the relation is true we do experiments to get lots of x’s and y’s (observations)• Suppose avg(x) > avg(y), or that most of the x’s are larger than all of the y’s. What does that prove? • Between subjects experiment– Two groups of test users– Each group uses only 1 of the systems• Within subjects experiment– One group of test users– Each person uses both systemsBAUsing Subjects2Between subjects• Two groups of testers, each use 1 system• Advantages: – Users only have to use one system (practical).– No learning effects.• Disadvantages:– Per-user performance differences confounded with system differences: – Much harder to get significant results (many more subjects needed). – Harder to even predict how many subjects will be needed (depends on subjects). Within subjects• One group of testers who use both systems• Advantages: – Much more significance for a given number of test subjects. • Disadvantages:– Users have to use both systems (two sessions). – Order and learning effects (can be minimized by experiment design). Significance• The significance or p-value of an outcome is the probability that it happens by chance if the relation does not hold. • E.g. p = 0.05 means that there is a 1/20 chance that the observation happens if the hypothesis is false.• So the smaller the p-value, the greater the significance. Normal distributions• Many variables have a Normal distribution• At left is the density, right is the cumulative prob.• Normal distributions are completely characterized by their mean and variance (mean squared deviation from the mean). Normal distributions• The difference between two independent normal variables is also a normal variable, whose variance is the sum of the variances of the distributions. • Asserting that X > Y is the same as (X-Y) > 0, whose probability we can read off from the curve.Statistics with care:• What you can do to get better significance:– Run each subject several times, compute the average for each subject. – Run the analysis as usual on subjects’ average times, with n = number of subjects.• This decreases the per-subject variance, while keeping data independent.3Some statistics• Variables X & Y• A relation (hypothesis) e.g. X > Y• We would often like to know if a relation is true– e.g. X = time taken by novice users– Y = time taken by users with some training• To find out if the relation is true we do experiments to get lots of x’s and y’s (observations)• Suppose avg(x) > avg(y), or that most of the x’s are larger than all of the y’s. What does that prove? Empirical Research• Correlational research– Don’t manipulate any variables– Look for correlation between variables– E.g. “Price of beer is positively correlated with wages of judges.”• Experimental research– Has both dependent and independent variables– Can demonstrate causality with control group– E.g. “effect of spell-check display”Pilot Usability Study Tips• Report results in terms– Process data– Bottom-line data• Other questions?Administrivia• Changes to grading scheme for hi-fi #1 presentation– In response to student feedback,– Original 20 points for group grade will now go to the presenters, i.e. all 40 points go to presenters– So, rest of group will not be penalized for what presenters did– This will be grading scheme for hi-fi #2 presentationAdministrivia• Online readings for last Monday’s lecture (shopping card, inverted pyramid web design patterns) will be posted on lecture homepage


View Full Document

Berkeley COMPSCI 160 - Discussion Section

Documents in this Course
E-LEAGUE

E-LEAGUE

15 pages

iCurator

iCurator

10 pages

Project

Project

14 pages

E-Drink

E-Drink

10 pages

Load more
Download Discussion Section
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Discussion Section and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Discussion Section 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?