DOC PREVIEW
TAMU COMM 305 - Exam Review
Type Lecture Note
Pages 4

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

COMM 305 1nd EditionLecture 14Outline of Last Lecture1. Speech Code TheoryOutline of Current Lecture1. Questions2. Review study guideCurrent LectureCircle the question you want to explain. Explain the answer you gave. In explaining sometimes people figure out the right answer. 1. Which of the following theories stipulate that we always want to reduce uncertainty in initial interaction? a) Uncertainty reduction theory b) Uncertainty management theory c) Relational Dialectics d) B and C e) All of the above 2. A researcher that first observes couples interacting to develop a theory of dyadic communication without considering previous theory or research is creating theory through a) deduction b) induction c) both d) neither 3. Blank is (are) a branch(es) of philosophy concerned with questions about the nature of knowledge. a) Epistemology - knowing b) Ontology c) Axiology - values d) Subjectivism e) A and C4. Managing disclosure in relationships can be best explained using which relational dialectic? a) Openness-Closedness b) Connectedness-Autonomy c) Certainty-Uncertainty d) Revelation-ConcealmentBad Question5. Charlotte is meeting new people at a party. What advice might we give her based on thetheories and research we reviewed in class? b) She should talk some, but also work to learn about the other person.6. Figure out both pieces. If you know the appraisal you know what the question is asking. The theory is an experience of your uncertainty. Why is studying first meetings is important? Gives us a better idea of how people react. You will not have another opportunity to make a good impression. First meetings are hard. They develop more: first date, interviewing for grad school. They want a recipe to follow. Enough people struggle with first meetings that you could sell these books. What is trivial talk? With acquaintance you have an equal amount of trivial talk. As you become better friends you still have trivial talk but the amount of trivial talk changes. Small talk is a category of trivial talk. What is the central premise of communication accommodation theory (CAT)? We want to accommodate. People try to be cooperative. We try to accommodate for our listeners. We assume people are telling the truth. Can the meaning of particular NVBs be explained in isolation from other NVBs? Explain. No. What women do when they are attracted to a man: show there palms, neck, and move closer. That is not attraction. You can’t study nonverbal in isolation. The meaning of a nonverbal changes based on what the eyes are doing.COMM 305 1nd EditionDo we tend to be good or bad at understanding nonverbal communication? We are good. Most of us can understand sarcasm. Most are good at using nonverbals. Are we on the whole good detectors of deception? No. How does attractiveness, power, or social status explain accommodation? We converge towards those we find attractive. We accommodate those who have more social status. Explain the characteristics of these patterns that we discussed in class (e.g., upward versus downward, full versus partial versus hyper, unimodal versus multimodal, symmetrical versus asymmetrical, subjective versus objective). Unimodal versus multimodal - growing similarities looking at patterns of similarities we are not looking for people doing the exact same things but modes. Modes meaning nonverbal behavior where people are matching. Growing similarities in multiple respects. The convergence may be full of matching or partialconvergence. Hyper convergence - level of accommodation - over the top mimicry Workers in a nursing home talking to residents loudly or using baby talk. This is hyper convergence or trying to hard. Hyper convergence is usually not effective. What ontological, epistemological, and axiological assumptions are most consistent with an etic approach to culture? An emic approach? Etic approach - trying to understand patterns of communication across cultures. Etic approach would be more consistent with a realist stance. Nomalist stance say there is nothing universal. The real world is about their own particular experience of the world. There is no universal to show the difference because everyones idea of culture is based on there own experiences. Emic - nomanalist or subjectivist stance. You can’t answer the question when it comes to axiology easily. People may have different attitudes when studying culture. Values that can’t be controlled or we can’t be aware of them is an emic


View Full Document

TAMU COMM 305 - Exam Review

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 4
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Exam Review
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam Review and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam Review 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?