UT GOV 312L - Oil Prices (5 pages)

Previewing pages 1, 2 of 5 page document View the full content.
View Full Document

Oil Prices



Previewing pages 1, 2 of actual document.

View the full content.
View Full Document
View Full Document

Oil Prices

247 views


Lecture number:
23
Pages:
5
Type:
Lecture Note
School:
University of Texas at Austin
Course:
Gov 312l - Issues and Policies in American Government
Edition:
1
Unformatted text preview:

GOV 312L 1st Edition Lecture 23 Outline of Current Lecture I TMFPQ II Oil prices III Environmental changes IV Tragedy of the commons V Cap and trade VI Climate change Current Lecture Collapse in oil prices based off of decision in OPEC Domestic revolution in the US TMFPQ Oil at 40 possible as market bc production can the flow the IEA estimates to return 40 in cash per barrel possible since oil has fallen from 12 18 and then in june 19 falling 40 worst year since 2008 when oil peaked Lower oil prices will help Cut production Lower supply this will raise prices This policy of cutting production has been Saudi Kuwait plan of attack Cost of production of shale is higher Saudi Kuwait want to drive US out of business if price of oil heating goods etc will collapse by maybe 60 this means huge transfer of wealth They rely on these oil revenues to maintain peace and stability In long run shale has created a lot of flexibility for the US in terms of FP Shale has become the main of the oil industry other countries are being affected for ex Russian Russian Ruble they ve lost about 20 of their value which has impacted and had spillover effects for the consumers and russian states Russia goes into recession next year for the first time since 2009 their economy goes down increase in travel outside of russia upside it help the russian state who exports the energy outside MEET THE PRESS VIDS moving towards energy dependency 5 year shift causing opec to go into panic we are in the middle of negotiating with iran These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor s lecture GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes not as a substitute russia needs well over 100 bucks and iran more in order to recoup global growth is exceeding oil production next vid has changed mentality towards us economy and they see it as us strength thinks that cap and trade generates economic value and is better than carbon tax change in oil prices will change the ease in difficulty of getting oil oil prices go down gap gets larger it becomes larglier to cut down on carbon emissions The Shale Revolution Environmental Changes Tragedy of the Commons What do we do with public resources eg air water land should we limit public usage of resources eg fishing farming What about privatized industries using public resources dumping into a river could get people sick but people need jobs at the factory by cutting pollution you cut production you cut income of workers Coase Theorem assign property rights to public goods for use used to determine use of resources ex Cap and Trade Cap and Trade There are caps in place for pollution for different companies regarding public resources companies can trade their allotted pollution to other companies to increase their production while the original owner of the rights makes money Problems How to assign and measure these resources used Who and what monitors the use Enforcement of rules The distributional politics of climate change Global warming and the environment Challenging political problem distributional struggle on at least three levels o Within countries business vs consumers in the US o Between countries China vs US Europe o Across generations current vs future inhabitants The science is contested Is the skepticism of global warming rooted in questioning the science or is it a political issue Scientific claim Science claims that greenhouse gases like CO2 in atmosphere is contributing to global warming o Attributed to human changes like Industrial Revolution burning fossil fuels oil coal o CO2 levels are at 399 2 parts per million topping out at 300 ppm in the last 400 00 years o Current trend 300 ppm at 1950 Effects o Temperatures up by 1 4 F since 1890 o Ice sheets melt ocean levels rise o Ocean temperatures rise The tragedy of the commons The Commons Public resources where it is difficult to exclude people from using the resource Divergence between private benefit and social cost Prisoner s dilemma Other people may consume the resource if you don t so you may think about using it before others Examples where the commons situation arise oil fields common grazing lands fisheries atmosphere forests Illustrative example Factory dumps pollutant into river People get sick for pollution but depend on the factory for the jobs Who should adjust o Should the factory not pollute lose its business o Or should the city gov t pay the factory to cut emissions and lower the cost of production for the factory by offering subsidies reducing taxes o Externalities the factors that are not borne by the factory more points here Coase Theorem In the absence of negotiating costs private agents will bargain to an efficient outcome as long as property rights are well defined So what s the important part of the theorem Defining property rights Assign property rights over common resources in these ways o Cap and trade impose caps on carbon emission give countries firm a certain quota to emit allow them to trade what they save in their quota o Set carbon price o Countries polluting less can sell their remaining right to pollute to other countries who pollute more o Market based solution Get firms to choose their own strategies to adjust based on their own price signals how they function Challenges of the Coase Theorem list here The political distributional challenges of a climate accord How to assign rights o Offer initial bargaining initiatives speed up emissions now to establish justification for property rights in the future BRIC Brazil Russia India China countries vs developed countries US EU o China demands foreign aid to offset the costs of producing less emissions o The variation of level of emissions in the countries US carbon consumption in electricity transportation industry EU less in transportation Capping carbon emission in developing countries will hurt development of industries Ethics of environmental protection Short term vs long term o Environmental protection comes at short term economic cost jobs and economy are hurt prices go up o Long term has huge reward but uncertain of how long in the future before the benefits Also we should ethically leave behind a better world for our future inhabitants Tangible vs abstract o Short term costs are tangible real especially to those who lose their jobs today What happens next year or the future becomes not so important o Ice cap melting food shortage and other things that will happen in the future seem less real seem abstract


View Full Document

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Oil Prices and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Oil Prices and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?