Victory Christian Center Expansion HATS Structural Design Steve Hawkins Project Engineer Client Liaison Curtis Anderson Project Engineer Zach Tatlock Project Manager Danielle Steinke Project Editor Overview Project Description Design Requirements Project Approach Final Solution Summary Project Description Client Victory Christian Center VCC Pastor Dana Coverstone Location Seelyville IN VCC Project Description Problem Tore down sanctuary 4 years ago All activities currently take place in gymnasium Limited parking Problems with storm water runoff Design Requirements Client Requirements Requests Design of Sanctuary Expansion Constraints Sanctuary Design of Additional Location Parking Project Approach Site Investigation Code Investigation Soil Investigation Design Options Assessment of Design Options Project Approach Architectural Design Structural Design Foundation Design Project Approach Stormwater Runoff Grading Plan Parking Design and Traffic Plan Final Cost Analysis Drawings Site Investigation Investigated Property Lines 688 Topography R S Zoning 690 Sewer Lines Power Water Natural Gas 688 692 692 C 1 Code Investigation Codes Investigated ASCE Standards Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures International Building Code ACI Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete AISC Steel Construction Manual Unified Zoning Ordinance of Vigo County Seelyville Code of Ordinances Soil Investigation 4 5 Sample Locations Tests Performed 5 Moisture Content Test 1 Attempted Location 2 Compressive Strength 3 Atterberg Limits Test Unconfined of Cohesive Soil Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes USCS Particle Size Analysis of Soils Wildcat Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Soil Investigation Results 0ft Dense to Very Dense 1 5ft 3 5ft Stiff to Medium Soft 9 5ft Soft to Medium 13ft Medium to Stiff 15ft Very Stiff to Hard Soil Investigation Conclusion Low Strength Soils Moderately Compressible Soils Several Foundation Options needed to be Evaluated Recommend Client Perform Phase I and or Phase II Geotechnical Investigation s Prior to Construction Design Options Structural Material Options Concrete CMU Steel Timber Rating Criteria Cost Maintenance Aesthetics Recyclability Rating System 1 3 points 1 worst 3 best Design Options Cost Aesthetics of Material Recyclability Maintenance 2 The structural material cannot be made per ft of cannot building 1 The material be recycled to blend in welliswith the surrounding 1 Maintenance required yearly area for any other projects 1 Cost 20 A brick fa ade is needed to make the structural material blend in well 2 Maintenance The material can is required be recycled oncewith for the 2 surrounding area 2 20 Cost 10 of projects a limited every decade number The structural material blends in well The Maintenance material can is required be recycled less for with the surrounding area without any 333 Cost 10 any than future oncefacing every project decade additional Assessment of Design Options Criteria Weighting Concrete CMU Steel Timber Cost 32 1 3 2 2 Maintenance 22 3 2 3 1 Aesthetics 17 3 3 2 3 Recyclability 29 2 1 3 1 Total 1 0 2 1 2 2 2 5 1 7 Architectural Design Client Requirements 3 Offices Secretary Office 6 Multi Purpose Classrooms 2 Sets of Bathrooms Baptism Room Quiet Room Storage Sanctuary Bathroom s Classroom Sound Room Classroom Classroom Baptism Room Cry Room Secretary Office Sanctuary Office Office Office Bathrooms Classroom Classroom Sitting Area Sanctuary Storage Classroom Structural Layout Structural Analysis Design Criteria Design Loads Wind Loading Serviceability Criteria Deflection Limits Structural Analysis Calculated Vertical Design Loads for Beams Columns Trusses Joists Calculated Lateral Design Loads for Braces Structural Design Design Beams Columns Trusses Braces Joists Metal Decks Foundation Design Auger cast grout piles vs Rammed Aggregate Pier RAP elements Auger Cast Grout Piles 103 000 RAP Geopier 65 000 Foundation Design Allowable Bearing Pressure 4 5 ksf Unfactored Column Loads 6 209 kip Average Column Load 70 kip Linear Wall Load 1 6 klf fc 3000 psi Stormwater Runof Additional Run off Possible Solutions Permeable Pavers Stormwater Basins Infiltration Trenches Vegetated Swales Final Solution Vegetated Swales Constructability Cost Maintenance 1 4 5 3 3 4 NTS Grading Plan 0 US 4 0 US 4 Parking and Traffic Plan 0 US 4 Final Cost Analysis Category Structure Foundation Cost 1 112 000 101 000 Vegetated Swale 800 Landscaping 4 500 Parking Lot 7 700 Total 1 226 000 RS Means 2007 data Drawings Architectural Structural Foundation Parking and Traffic Three Dimensional Summary Project Tasks Design of Sanctuary Expansion Additional Parking Contact Steve Hawkins hawkinsd rose hulman edu Questions Project Description Geotechnical Results Design Requirements Structural Material Research Project Approach LEED Ratings Site Investigation Architectural Drawings Soil Investigation References Design Options Parking Lot Stalls Assessment of Options Architectural Design Structural Analysis Design Foundation Design Stormwater Runoff Grading Plan Parking Traffic Final Cost Drawings Geotechnical Results Sample Location Unified Soil Classification Unconfined Compressive Strength psf Point 1 Lean Clay 1004 Point 2 Lean Clay 2698 Point 3 Sandy Lean Clay 3316 Point 4 Lean Clay 2129 Point 5 Lean Clay 3485 Structural Material Research Steel Criteria Results Cost 12 per sq ft Maintenance little to no maintenance is required Aesthetics a brick fa ade can be applied to the material Reusability can be reused structurally Structural Material Research CMU Criteria Results Cost 8 70 per sq ft Maintenance water repellant spray once every decade Aesthetics a brick fa ade can be applied to the material Reusability can be crushed up and reused in some projects Structural Material Research Timber Criteria Results Cost 9 86 per sq ft Maintenance maintenance is required on a yearly basis Aesthetics a brick fa ade can be applied to the material Reusability cannot be reused structurally Structural Material Research Concrete Criteria Results Cost 28 00 per sq ft Maintenance little to no maintenance Aesthetics a brick fa ade can be applied to the material Reusability can be crushed up and reused in some projects Structural Material Research CMU 5 Material Reuse 10 Material Reuse 10 Recycled Content 20 Recycled Content 10 Extracted Processed Manufactured Regionally 20 Extracted Processed Manufactured Regionally Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood Total