Slide 1HATS Structural DesignOverviewProject DescriptionProject Description: ProblemDesign RequirementsProject ApproachProject ApproachProject ApproachSlide 10Code InvestigationSlide 12Soil InvestigationSoil InvestigationDesign OptionsDesign OptionsAssessment of Design OptionsArchitectural DesignSlide 19Slide 20Slide 21Structural LayoutStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisStructural DesignFoundation DesignFoundation DesignStormwater RunoffGrading PlanParking and Traffic PlanSlide 31Final Cost AnalysisDrawingsSummarySlide 35Slide 36Geotechnical ResultsStructural Material ResearchStructural Material ResearchStructural Material ResearchStructural Material ResearchStructural Material ResearchReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesReferencesSlide 48Slide 49Parking StallsVictory Christian Center ExpansionHATS Structural DesignSteve Hawkins – Project Engineer & Client LiaisonCurtis Anderson – Project EngineerZach Tatlock – Project ManagerDanielle Steinke – Project EditorOverviewProject DescriptionDesign RequirementsProject ApproachFinal SolutionSummaryProject DescriptionClient:Victory Christian Center (VCC)Pastor Dana CoverstoneLocation: Seelyville, INVCCProject Description:ProblemTore down sanctuary 4 years agoAll activities currently take place in gymnasiumLimited parkingProblems with storm water runoffClient Requirements/RequestsConstraintsDesign Requirements•Design of Sanctuary Expansion•Design of Additional Parking•Sanctuary LocationProject ApproachSite InvestigationCode InvestigationSoil InvestigationDesign OptionsAssessment of Design OptionsProject ApproachArchitectural DesignStructural DesignFoundation DesignProject ApproachStormwater RunoffGrading PlanParking Design and Traffic PlanFinal Cost AnalysisDrawingsSite Investigation Investigated: Property Lines Topography Zoning Sewer Lines Power Water Natural GasR-SC-1690692688692688Code InvestigationCodes Investigated:ASCE Standards Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other StructuresInternational Building CodeACI Building Code Requirements for Structural ConcreteAISC Steel Construction ManualUnified Zoning Ordinance of Vigo CountySeelyville Code of OrdinancesSoil Investigation 5 Sample Locations Tests Performed•Moisture Content Test•Atterberg Limits Test•Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil•Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (USCS)•Particle Size Analysis of Soils•Wildcat Dynamic Cone Penetrometer 25Attempted Location143Soil InvestigationResults: Very Stiff to HardStiff to MediumSoftSoft to MediumDense to Very DenseMedium to Stiff0ft -1.5ft -3.5ft -9.5ft -13ft -15ft -Soil InvestigationConclusion: Low Strength SoilsModerately Compressible SoilsSeveral Foundation Options needed to be Evaluated Recommend Client Perform Phase I and/or Phase II Geotechnical Investigation(s) Prior to ConstructionDesign OptionsStructural Material Options Concrete CMU Steel TimberRating Criteria Cost Maintenance Aesthetics RecyclabilityRating System1-3 points1= worst 3 = bestRecyclability1The material cannot be recycled for any other projects.2The material can be recycled for a limited number of projects.3The material can be recycled for any future project.Cost of Material (per ft2 of building)1Cost > $202$20 ≥ Cost > $103Cost ≤ $10Maintenance1Maintenance is required yearly.2Maintenance is required once every decade.3Maintenance is required less than once every decade.Aesthetics1The structural material cannot be made to blend in well with the surrounding area2A brick façade is needed to make the structural material blend in well with the surrounding area3The structural material blends in well with the surrounding area without any additional facingDesign OptionsCriteria Weighting Concrete CMU Steel TimberCost .32 1 3 2 2Maintenance .22 3 2 3 1Aesthetics .17 3 3 2 3Recyclability .29 2 1 3 1Total 1.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 1.7Assessment of Design OptionsArchitectural DesignClient Requirements: 3 Offices Secretary Office 6 Multi-Purpose Classrooms 2 Sets of Bathrooms Baptism Room Quiet Room Storage SanctuaryBathroomsClassroomClassroomClassroomBaptism RoomSecretary OfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeSanctuaryCry RoomSound RoomBathroomsClassroomClassroomClassroomStorageSitting AreaSanctuaryStructural LayoutStructural AnalysisDesign CriteriaDesign LoadsWind LoadingServiceability Criteria (Deflection Limits)Structural AnalysisCalculated Vertical Design Loads for:BeamsColumnsTrussesJoistsCalculated Lateral Design Loads for:BracesStructural DesignDesign:Beams ColumnsTrussesBracesJoists Metal DecksFoundation DesignAuger cast grout piles vs. Rammed Aggregate Pier (RAP) elementsAuger Cast Grout Piles $103,000 RAP (Geopier ®) $65,000Foundation DesignAllowable Bearing Pressure = 4.5 ksfUnfactored Column Loads = 6 - 209 kipAverage Column Load = 70 kipLinear Wall Load = 1.6 klffc’= 3000 psiStormwater RunofAdditional Run-offPossible Solutions:Permeable PaversStormwater BasinsInfiltration TrenchesVegetated SwalesFinal Solution : Vegetated SwalesConstructabilityCostMaintenance313’4”4.5”NTSGrading PlanUS 40US 40Parking and Traffic PlanUS 40Final Cost AnalysisCategory CostStructure $1,112,000 Foundation $101,000Vegetated Swale $800Landscaping $4,500Parking Lot $7,700Total$1,226,000RS Means 2007 dataDrawingsArchitectural Structural Foundation Parking and Traffic Three DimensionalProject Tasks: Design ofSanctuary ExpansionAdditional ParkingContact: Steve [email protected]?Geotechnical ResultsStructural Material ResearchReferencesArchitectural DrawingsLEED RatingsProject DescriptionDesign RequirementsProject ApproachSite InvestigationSoil InvestigationDesign OptionsAssessment of OptionsArchitectural DesignStructural Analysis/DesignFoundation DesignStormwater RunoffGrading PlanParking & TrafficFinal CostDrawingsParking Lot StallsGeotechnical ResultsSample LocationUnified Soil ClassificationUnconfined Compressive Strength (psf)Point 1 Lean Clay 1004Point 2 Lean Clay 2698Point 3 Sandy Lean Clay 3316Point 4 Lean Clay 2129Point 5 Lean Clay 3485Structural Material ResearchCriteria ResultsCost $12 per sq. ft. Maintenance little to no maintenance is requiredAesthetics a brick façade can be applied to the materialReusability can
View Full Document