Larrison Pavilion Deming Park Terre Haute, IndianaTeam IntroductionOverviewProject DescriptionDesign RequirementsProject ApproachProgress to Date Codes & RegulationsSlide 8Progress to Date Site AssessmentProgress to Date Utilities and Soil AnalysisProgress to Date Soil AnalysisSlide 12Progress to Date TrafficProgress to Date Proposed DesignProgress to Date The Decision Matrix ProcessProgress to Date The Decision Matrix ResultsProgress to Date Structural FramingFuture DirectionFuture DirectionSlide 20Schedule of WorkSummarySlide 23Larrison PavilionLarrison PavilionDeming ParkDeming ParkTerre Haute, IndianaTerre Haute, IndianaTeam IntroductionTeam IntroductionMartin Brenny – Project Martin Brenny – Project EngineerEngineerShawn Smith – Client LiaisonShawn Smith – Client LiaisonMike Thompson – Project Mike Thompson – Project EditorEditorJon Hawkins – Project Jon Hawkins – Project ManagerManagerOverviewOverviewProject Project DescriptionDescriptionDesign Design Requirements Requirements Project Project ApproachApproach Progress to DateProgress to DateFuture DirectionFuture DirectionProject DescriptionProject Description5820 sq. ft.5820 sq. ft.Partially Partially DemolishedDemolishedDemolish & Demolish & RebuildRebuildDesign RequirementsDesign Requirements150 Person 150 Person CapacityCapacityBanquet RoomBanquet RoomStage, StorageStage, StorageRestroomsRestroomsLobbyLobbyCamps, Gatherings, Camps, Gatherings, ReceptionsReceptionsAesthetically Aesthetically PleasingPleasingProject ApproachProject ApproachCodes & Codes & RegulationsRegulationsSite AssessmentSite AssessmentSoil AnalysisSoil AnalysisDecision MatricesDecision MatricesFoundation DesignFoundation DesignStructural DesignStructural DesignTransportationTransportationProgress to DateProgress to DateCodes & RegulationsCodes & Regulations2000 International 2000 International Building CodeBuilding Code•Assembly Level A-2Assembly Level A-2•15 sq. ft. for each 15 sq. ft. for each occupantoccupant•7 ½ ft. minimum 7 ½ ft. minimum ceiling heightceiling height•1 exit for each 50 1 exit for each 50 occupantsoccupants•Patio RequirementsPatio RequirementsProgress to DateProgress to DateCodes & RegulationsCodes & RegulationsFoundation DesignFoundation Design•Geotechnical Geotechnical EngineeringEngineering•Foundation EngineeringFoundation EngineeringStructural DesignStructural Design•American Institute of American Institute of Steel Construction Steel Construction (AISC)(AISC)•American Concrete American Concrete Institute (ACI) Institute (ACI) •Allowable Stress Design Allowable Stress Design (ASD)(ASD)Soil TestingSoil Testing•American Standard of American Standard of Testing Methods (ASTM)Testing Methods (ASTM)LEEDLEEDProgress to DateProgress to Date Site AssessmentSite AssessmentSite of Existing PavilionLocation of TreesNew Building SiteProgress to DateProgress to Date Utilities and Soil AnalysisUtilities and Soil AnalysisLocation of Location of UtilitiesUtilitiesSoil AnalysisSoil Analysis•Dynamic ConeDynamic ConeStandard Standard Penetration Penetration TestTestBearing Bearing Capacity of SoilCapacity of SoilProgress to DateProgress to Date Soil AnalysisSoil AnalysisProgress to DateProgress to Date Soil AnalysisSoil AnalysisSoil AnalysisSoil Analysis•Soil SampleSoil SampleGrain Size AnalysisGrain Size AnalysisDirect Shear TestDirect Shear TestFriction AngleFriction AngleLoose 38.8°Loose 38.8°Dense 42.7°Dense 42.7°Progress to DateProgress to Date TrafficTrafficAccess and EgressAccess and EgressAdd access from Add access from road in rear of road in rear of pavilionpavilionParkingParking•150 people150 people•40-50 spaces 40-50 spaces currentlycurrently•Propose terraced Propose terraced parking lotparking lotProgress to DateProgress to Date ProposedProposed Design Design•Two-Section Floor Plan•Sloping Roof•Outdoor Patio Area•Retaining WallsProgress to DateProgress to Date The Decision Matrix The Decision Matrix ProcessProcess• Use to evaluate best structural material Cost Aesthetics Environmental Impact MaintenanceProgress to DateProgress to Date The Decision Matrix The Decision Matrix ResultsResultsProgress to DateProgress to Date Structural FramingStructural Framing• Concrete Foundation• Steel Columns• Timber Roof FramingFuture DirectionFuture Direction •Structural Analysis •Strength and Size of Columns and Beams•Preliminary connection design •Multiple types of structural materials•Aesthetics & CostsFuture DirectionFuture DirectionFoundation DesignFoundation Design•Density, friction angle, comp. strengthDensity, friction angle, comp. strengthFinalize Architectural DesignFinalize Architectural Design•Material Selection w/ aid from Mr. Material Selection w/ aid from Mr. ArnoldArnoldStructural DesignStructural Design•Applied LoadsApplied LoadsFuture DirectionFuture DirectionPaving MaterialsPaving Materials• Minimal Pervious AreaMinimal Pervious AreaRunoff controlRunoff control•ConstructionConstruction•Increase in Impervious Increase in Impervious AreaAreaTerrainLandscaping•Aesthetics to the parkSchedule of WorkSchedule of WorkOctNov.Dec. Jan.Feb.Mar. Apr.May.Site Assessment       Existing Situations       Codes & Regulations       Design Alternatives       Assess. of Design Alt.       Design       Cost Analysis       SummarySummaryProject Project DescriptionDescriptionDesign Design Requirements Requirements Project Approach Project Approach Progress to DateProgress to DateFuture DirectionFuture DirectionSchedule of WorkSchedule of