DOC PREVIEW
UGA PSYC 3260 - Collecting Data
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Most samples in sexuality research are limitedVolunteer bias: sample is not truly random because it relies on volunteersVolunteers for sexuality research:More permissive attitudes about sexMore sexually experiencedMore likely to be maleLess religiousMore likely to be politically liberalMore likely to be college studentsMethods of Collecting DataSelf –report: ask participants about sexual attitudes and behavior directlyDesign Concerns:Limited choicesAmbiguous questionsWording of questionsOrder of questionsParticipant Concerns:Purposeful distortion (enlargements—exaggerating, concealments—hiding something)Problems with memoryDifficulties with estimatesTypes of Self ReportSurveys/QuestionnairesWrittenExample: National Survey of Sexual Health and BehaviorErotophobia vs. ErotophiliaPros: Quick and cheap, greater anonymityCons: No chance to clarify, get extra info, build rapportInterviewsVerbalExample: KinseyPros: Develop rapport, clarify, elicit more infoCons: More purposeful distortion, more time and money, characteristics of interviewer may influence resultsPeople tend to have more of a rapport with someone who is like themCombo of a survey/questionnaire and interview may be best!PSYCH 3260 1st Edition Lecture 2Outline of Last Lecture I. What is sexuality?II. Sexuality in US v Rest of Worlda. Ethnocentrism III. Research Methodsa. Ethical Concernsb. Collecting DataOutline of Current Lecture I. Samplesa. Volunteer biasII. Methods of Collecting Dataa. Self-reportb. Interviews Current Lecture- Most samples in sexuality research are limitedo Volunteer bias: sample is not truly random because it relies on volunteers- Volunteers for sexuality research:o More permissive attitudes about sexo More sexually experiencedo More likely to be maleo Less religiousThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.o More likely to be politically liberalo More likely to be college students- Methods of Collecting Datao Self –report: ask participants about sexual attitudes and behavior directly Design Concerns: Limited choices Ambiguous questions Wording of questions Order of questions Participant Concerns: Purposeful distortion (enlargements—exaggerating, concealments—hiding something) Problems with memory Difficulties with estimateso Types of Self Report Surveys/Questionnaires Written- Example: National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior- Erotophobia vs. Erotophilia Pros: Quick and cheap, greater anonymity Cons: No chance to clarify, get extra info, build rapport Interviews Verbal- Example: Kinsey- Pros: Develop rapport, clarify, elicit more info- Cons: More purposeful distortion, more time and money, characteristics of interviewer may influence resultso People tend to have more of a rapport with someone who is like them Combo of a survey/questionnaire and interview may be


View Full Document

UGA PSYC 3260 - Collecting Data

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Collecting Data
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Collecting Data and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Collecting Data 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?