Unformatted text preview:

MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu CMS.608 / CMS.864 Game DesignSpring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.CMS.608 – 6 March 2008 Notes by Clara Rhee - The reading had two bad definitions of “information” - In the future, don’t use the word “information” …unless you’re trying to deliberately confuse - ‘Information’ as a measure of uncertainty - In the Shannon-Weaver model, information is the range of possibilities - So in game design, the perimeter of all moves that the players can make is the possibility space - Degrees of freedom, range of choice - One important difference between information and uncertainty is NOISE - Noise is a part of the information that is not controllable by the source - This fits in with the idea of games as purposely inefficient systems - Being unable to clearly communicate in Charades or Pictionary is the point of the game - It can be more fun, or it can be just frustrating - Game state and player knowledge can be obfuscated - A particular signal can mean more than one thing - Can happen in many ways – for example, low sampling rate - Are there games where you’re trying to communicate to some people but not others? - Canadian Fish, Kemps, Bridge, sports signals - There’s misdirection, obfuscation, encoding - Noise cancellation is redundancy is error correction - Are there games with error correction? - Sudoku, Picross, any game with multiple referees, photo-finish for races - Even in video games, if you get shot, there are multiple signals: sound effects, red flash, stats drop, other visual effects… - Perfect vs. Imperfect knowledge - Most board games have perfect knowledge - Are there card games with perfect knowledge? - Freecell, - Blackjack? Is the state of the deck knowledge? - Hard to find, because cards are designed for hiding information - There are games with too much knowledge as well as too little knowledge - There are games where the rules are the commodity - Flux, Mao - Computer games can be generally slow to introduce rules, since the rules are hard coded in, so the players don’t need to understand every nuance to play - Over the course of play, the range of uncertainty generally decreases - Are there games where uncertainty increases? - Mario Kart? - Strategy games where the effects multiplyManaging information, I mean knowledge, overload - Player memory and player computation power - Many games (especially German computer simulations!) throw a matrix of information at you – too much! - But too little information, like a text adventure, can be bad too - Overall, decisions should be easy to make and execute - The data can be obscured (and should be sometimes!) - Objective vs. perceived information (warning: bad definition in book!) - Is perceived information the stuff you the player know and the objective info what’s there in the


View Full Document

MIT CMS 608 - Lecture Notes

Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?