DOC PREVIEW
UMass Amherst NRC 261 - Population Estimation

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 9 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 8 Outline of Last Lecture II. What Constitutes a Population? III. Population Dynamics IV. Population Change a. Exponential Growth b. Population Crashes c. Exponential Growth V. Cyclic Population Change VI. Biological Carrying Capacity a. Density independent factors b. Density dependent factors VII. Cultural Carrying Capacity VIII. Birth/Reproductive Rates IX. Death/Mortality Rates X. Original Questions Outline of Current Lecture II. Why Count Wildlife? a. Easy to Count? III. Possible Biases IV. Population Estimation a. 2 main questions V. Eastern Timber Wolf Recovery Plan VI. Mark-Recapture Estimate NRC 261 1!!!These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best !used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute. !!a. Assumptions of mark-recapture estimates VII. Indices of Abundance VIII. Original Question !Current Lecture Start Exam 2 Material Population Estimation Question: How did we know if there were enough wolves present in the Western Great Lakes region to meet official recovery goals and thus take them off of the Endangered Species List? !Why count (assess abundance of) wildlife? •want to know if there are too few •ex: when there were 15 condors, or 14 red wolves left in the world and knowing the # had to increase •once they get too low it becomes really difficult and important •want to know if there are too many? •cultural carrying capacity (for the most part) — people start wanting them gone once they think there are too many/they are becoming a nuisance •how to get the number down? down to what? •is there enough? •ex: things harvested by people like ducks, if there are enough or more than enough to shoot then it offers more opportunity for hunting •Is population in good or bad shape? •status of the population, how many there are, how is the population doing !Easy to “count”? -some things might be fairly easy to count — if they’re active during the day and easy to see like the gray squirrel!-raccoons: active at night and secretive, takes more work to figure out how many there are, need lots of traps in lots of places etc. (can’t just go out and count them) -some things that are hunted that might be in the middle -ex: white tailed deer, some densities they’re easy to count and some densities they’re harder to count. If they’ve eaten the entire understory of the park (vegetation under trees) and you could see them and count them !Possible Biases -ways in which you could be wrong because of the way you collected the data -conditions under which you’re going out and doing the survey (for any animal) -weather — affects visibility, windy day makes it hard to hear birds to identify species and how far away they are -accessibility — some places make it easy to count things because they’re easy to get to, easy for wildlife to move around, some places are off the beaten path -ex: rhino example, some spots where they didn’t survey because it took two weeks of walking just to get there -animal density — rare things are really hard to find and therefore hard to count -vegetation/topography— some places have too much vegetation, hard to count in places that are too steep etc. -observer effort: -systematic: the kind of effort, someone isn’t trained very well may constantly miss seeing certain things -you might not sample enough, if you only sample a little bit you might not really know the correct population numbers -ex: only coming into this class once, you wouldn’t get a good idea of the average # of students in the class -timing -seasons — some seasons are bad to survey and some are good!-time of day (some animals active at day, some active at night) — if you’re counting birds you have to be counting them starting half an hour before sunrise -animal behavior -differential observability: when you set automatic cameras on jaguar trails, males get photographed more often than females (2x as much) but that isn’t the population sex ratio. Males get photoed more often because those are the trails males use, and females esp. females with cubs don’t hang around where males are -variation in distribution: animal distributed differently across the landscape, different densities in different areas, much understand this to sample in appropriate ways to get the right count -different “catchability” : some species easier to see than others, less shy of people than in other places **lots of different ways that you can be wrong** !Population Estimation -systematic -representative of whatever population/area you’re trying to come up with estimation for -statistically reliable -unbiased — must take into account how you could be wrong because of the factors listed above -porcupine example — could be under rocks, could be on back side of the tree (didn’t turn around), didn’t look up, didn’t see 100% of the ones on the line you were walking -repeatable —if you or someone else came back and did it again using the same techniques, you would arrive at the same answer — you should be able to get the same answer given the same techniques every time !2 main questions you must be able to answer:!1. How important is the information? (how precise do I have to be? Do I have to know exactly how many animals there are, a lot, very few, statistical amount, etc.) - census = a complete, exact count (if you need the #) - estimate = gives you a number but is not a complete count (range of what it could be) - index = relatively a lot, relatively not so many. There are less today than there were yesterday etc. *depends on importance, with endangered species might want to know exact number !2. How much will it cost? -will cost more for an exact count than to only get an indices -if you’re trying to identify the proportion of moose w/ radio transmitters to get an estimate, it would cost a lot for radio transmitter and to get the moose, lots of $$ -using a helicopter to go catch animals, lots of $$ (2,000 dollars an hour for a helicopter in Newfoundland) -flying in an airplane (aerial survey) costs a couple hundred dollars an hour to use to count animals from the air !Eastern Timber Wolf Recovery Plan -rules for endangered species list was solidified in the early 1970’s -poster child for endangered species was the timber wolf (diminished from all over the country into a small corner of Minnesota) -in order to recover this species they


View Full Document
Download Population Estimation
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Population Estimation and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Population Estimation 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?