DOC PREVIEW
ISU PSY 223 - Perceiving Persons

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 10 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Social PerceptionSituations & BehaviorFace Recognition & EmotionNonverbal BehaviorDetecting DeceptionMicroexpression ResearchAttributionsAttribution theories (cont.)Slide 10Ch 4: Perceiving PersonsPart 1: Feb. 9, 2012Social Perception•Get info from people, situations, & behavior–We make quick 1st impressions of people•Attempt to read traits from faces–Baby-faced vs. mature features–Is there an evolutionary need?–Situations – •ScriptsSituations & Behavior–Use situational cues to interpret behavior•Behavior & social perception:–Derive meaning from physical behavior–Includes nonverbal behavior•6 primary universal emotions – what are they?–Facial expressions across cultures – results?–Matsumoto’s research – results?Face Recognition & Emotion•Evoluationary value to quick recognition–Angry faces?–Attentional blink = how does it work?•What are exceptions?Nonverbal Behavior•Importance of eye contact & touch–Interpretation of avoiding eye contact?•Differences in nonverbal cues across cultures–Examples?Detecting Deception•Can we use this info to detect deception?–Facial versus body movements•What leads to better accuracy?–Not much better than 50/50 chance•see Table 4.2 in bookMicroexpression Research–Paul Ekman’s research:•What are microexpressions?•Examples of contempt, disgust…–Apply to security screening situations - how do these work?•High cognitive effort tasksAttributions•Attribution = explanation about a behavior–Heider – personal vs. situational–Attribution theories:•1. Jones – Correspondent Inference theory:–Infer from action - what give the most info about the person?1. Did the person have a choice?2. Was the behavior expected?3. How many positive effects were there?Attribution theories (cont.)•2) Kelly’s Covariation theory:–Attribute behavior to internal (person) or external (situation) based on 3 questions –•1. Consensus•2. Distinctiveness•3. Consistency•See fig 4.4•If low distinctiveness & low consensus, but high consistency, which attribution? –Example?•If high distinctiveness & high consensus, but low consistency, which


View Full Document

ISU PSY 223 - Perceiving Persons

Download Perceiving Persons
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Perceiving Persons and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Perceiving Persons 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?