DOC PREVIEW
UCLA PSYCH 10 - Social Psychology

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 7 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 7 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Definition: The scientific study of the way in which people’s thoughts, feelings, attitudes or behavior are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other peopleWhat social psychology is not:It is not sociologyGroups vs. individualsRarely do experimentsIt is not personality psychologyIndividual differences vs. the situationIt is not clinical psychologyAbnormal behavior vs. typical behaviorWhy do we study it:Need to understand the importance and consequences of group livingUse this to help reduce social problemsFun examples of social psychology findings: Social Psych is NOT common senseIf you give children a reward for doing something they already enjoy doing, they will subsequently like the activitymorethe samelessAnswer: lessSeeing someone you admire do something rather clumsy or stupid, such as spilling a cup of coffee, will make you like him or hermorethe samelessMore: humanizes the personRepeated exposure to a stimulus, such as a person or a painting, will make you like itmorethe samelessless, example: over playing a songEating sweets can actually make you not only seem more sweet, but also lead you to behave in more caring ways.TrueThe greater the cohesiveness or solidarity of a group, the better its decisions will be.TrueFalseFalse: people start jumping on the bandwagon and stop expressing their opinionsSocial Thinking: Involves thinking about others, especially when they engage in doing things that are unexpected.Attribution Theory (Fritz Heider): we have a tendency to give causal explanations for someone’s behavior, often by crediting either the situation or the person’s disposition.The theory of how people explain others’ behavior; for example, by attributing it either to internal dispositions (enduring traits, motives, and attributions) or to external situationsdispositional attributions – attributing behaviors to a person’s disposition and traitsDispositions are enduring personality traits. So, if Joe is a quiet, shy, and introverted child, he is likely to be like that in a number of situationssituational attributions – attributing behavior to the environmentSituational inferences: attributing behavior to the environmentDispositional Inferences: attributing behavior to the person’s disposition and traitsFundamental Attribution Error: The tendency to overestimate the impact of personal disposition and underestimate the impact of the situations in analyzing the behaviors of others leads to the fundamental attribution error (FAE)Ex: road rage= we think that the person cutting us off is doing it because he/she is a bad person, without considering environment (bad day)FAE has a powerful influence on our perceptions of other people.Occurs more often with strangers than close othersLeads to tolerant attitude or defensive oneAttitudes: is a positive or negative evaluation of people, objects, issues, or ideasAttitudes are affected by our actions; the way you behave can influence the way you feel; not only do they stand for what they believe in, they begin to believe what their standing for.Foot in the door technique: Process of getting someone to agree to a smaller request/behavior in order to subsequently ask for a bigger request/behavior; Performing a trivial act makes the next task easier to agree toIf you donate 25 cents to a charity one time you are more likely to donate 50 cents the next time because you feel your already invested in itRole Playing: Prison Experiment Zimbardo (1972)- how role playing affects attitudesassigned the roles of guards and prisoners to random students and found that guards and prisoners developed role- appropriate attitudes.Took average undergraduate studentsWent through a battery of mental health assessments (made sure everyone was at “normal” as possibleStudy was meant to last for 2 weeksSet up a Prison in the Stanford Psychology Building basementParticipants were recruited as guards and prisonersVIDEO: people begin to believe the roles they were assigned; completely average people, later assigned roles, became cruel (if guards), rebellious, riotous, afraid, submissive (prisoners), even experimenter begins to take up the attitude of a prison wardenImportant to know that BOTH person factors and situations factors are involved herePerson: Features or characteristics that individuals carry into social situationsSituation: Environmental events or circumstances outside the personWhy do actions affect your attitude? Cognitive Dissonance: When our actions and attitudes are opposed, we eperience tension= cognitive dissonanceOne route to attitude change can occur when we act in ways that are counter to an attitude we hold.Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory: when one cognition is inconsistent with another cognition (or behavior or self-view), the resulting discomfort motivates us to find a way to restore cognitive balance or consistencyDissonance - the unpleasant state of psychological arousal resulting from an inconsistency within one's important attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors.Counterattitudinal action - A behavior that is inconsistent with an existing attitudeWhen a person performs a counterattitudinal action, he or she often attempts to reconcile these inconsistencies by justifying the action or changing their attitudeSimpsons: Homer wants cable, but he has to steal, so he changes the way he thinks about it: cable is a faceless coorperation, everyone does it=justifiedCognitive Dissonance Theory:1. Students performed a boring task (turning pegs in holes for an hour)2. Then were asked to tell another student it was interesting – and for this, they were paid either $1 or $20Under which condition are you most likely to believe your little lie and say the experiment actually was interesting...A. when paid $1B. when paid $20A: you will BELIEVE the task was INTERESTING because if your paid $20 you have a sufficient justification for why you do the entire boring experiment (it sucked, but I got paid $20), whereas if your paid $1, there is no powerful external source and person was not forced (I wasn’t forced to do it, there was no powerful external source like a large monetary compensation- I must have liked it a little to have stayed the whole time)Conformity:We are more likely to conform when:Are made to feel incompetentAre in a group with a least three peopleAre in a group in which everyone else agreesAdmire the group’s status and attractivenessHave not made a prior commitment to any responseKnow that others


View Full Document
Download Social Psychology
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Social Psychology and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Social Psychology 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?