DOC PREVIEW
UMBC CMSC 691 - Proposals

This preview shows page 1-2-14-15-29-30 out of 30 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 30 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

ProposalsSourcesOutlineProposal ContentsKnow Your GoalsProposal StrategyTopics to CoverLong-Term GoalsSignificanceSpecific GoalsMethods and ExperimentsFeasibilityRisksCurrent State of KnowledgeTimetableBudget / JustificationBiographiesReferencesGeneral AdviceGeneral Proposal AdviceSources of FundingGovernment AgenciesIndustryProposal EvaluationNSF Review CriteriaNSF RatingsNSF: How it Really WorksDARPA Proposal RoadmapDARPA: How it Really WorksNSF vs. DARPASeptember1999October 1999October 1999ProposalsMarie desJardins ([email protected])CMSC 691BMarch 16, 2004September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 2SourcesRobert L. Peters, Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student’s Guide to Earning a Master’s or Ph.D. (Revised Edition). NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1997.Peter J. Feibelman, A Ph.D. Is Not Enough! A Guide to Survival in Science. Basic Books, 1993.Tom Dietterich, CS 519 course slides, Oregon State University.Caroline Wardle, Obtaining Federal Funding, CRA-W Workshop Slides, 1993/1994/1999.September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 3OutlineProposal ContentsGeneral AdviceSources of FundingProposal EvaluationSeptember1999October 1999October 1999Proposal ContentsSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 5Know Your GoalsDissertation proposalConvince committee you’re on the right trackFunding proposalConvince reviewers and program manager to give you moneySeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 6Proposal StrategyJust having a good idea is not enough!Need to convince reviewers that:The problem is importantYou have a good approach to solve the problemYour approach is likely to succeedYou have a well developed research planChicken-and-egg problem If you don’t have preliminary results and a well developed approach, you’re not likely to make a convincing case for success If you already have preliminary results and a well developed approach, you’re already doing the research!→ By the time you get the funding, you’ll be done! ...so with the funding you get, you’ll write the journal papers, and start developing preliminary results for the next proposal...September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 7Topics to CoverLong-term goalsSignificanceSpecific goalsMethods and experimentsFeasibilityRisksCurrent state of knowledgeTimetableBudget/budget justificationBiographiesTypically 15 pages or less!September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 8Long-Term GoalsVisionBig pictureBroad focusMotivation behind your workSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 9SignificanceWhy do you want to work on this problem?Why will other people care about it?...in the field...in other fields...in society...in the program...on your committeeSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 10Specific GoalsWhat part of the big picture will you focus on?What specific tasks will you accomplish?September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 11Methods and ExperimentsHow will you demonstrate success?How will you test your claims?Data sets, domains, experimental methodologies, evaluation criteriaSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 12FeasibilityWhy should we believe you will be able to carry out this research plan?September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 13RisksWhat might go wrong?How will you recover?What’s your backup/contingency plan?September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 14Current State of KnowledgeWho else has worked on this problem?Why have previous approaches been unsuccessful?...or if this is a new problem, why are new approaches needed?How does your method build on, or depart from, previous approaches?September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 15TimetableTypical research grant: 2-3 years, sometimes up to 5Typical dissertation timeline (from proposal): 1-3 yearsWhat are your milestones?Approximately when do you expect to complete each milestone?Relevant deadlines (conference deadlines, program meetings, integrated demonstrations)September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 16Budget / JustificationHow much money do you need?Why is each line item important to the project?September1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 17BiographiesTypically one- or two-page abbreviated CVSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 18ReferencesFor thesis proposal only:Annotated bibliography is very helpfulCan include important/relevant papers that you plan to read, but haven’t read yet. (should discuss these separately in Related Work section)September1999October 1999October 1999General AdviceSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 20General Proposal AdviceStart writing early!First impressions count: A good introduction/summary is absolutely essential!!Be neat!Be as specific as possibleDon’t make your reviewers work too hardKeep revisingGet feedback from peers and mentorsResubmit if necessaryRead other people’s proposalsSeptember1999October 1999October 1999Sources of FundingSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 22Government AgenciesNSFNIHDoDDARPAAFOSRARLDepartments of Education, Energy, ...Other agenciesSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 23IndustrySponsored researchPartnershipsEquipment grantsSeptember1999October 1999October 1999Proposal EvaluationSeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 25NSF Review CriteriaIntellectual MeritIncreasing knowledge and understanding within a fieldQualifications of proposersCreativity and originalityScope and organization of proposed researchAccess to resourcesBroader ImpactTeaching, training, and learningParticipation of underrepresented groupsEnhancement of research infrastructureDissemination of resultsBenefits to societySeptember1999October 1999October 19994/6/04 26NSF RatingsExcellentPerhaps 10% of proposals; should definitely be funded Very GoodTop 1/3 of proposals; should be considered for funding if sufficient funds are availableGoodMiddle 1/3 of proposals; worthy of support (but likely will not be enough funding for this category)FairBottom 1/3 of proposals; not likely to be considered for fundingPoorProposal has serious deficiencies and should not be fundedTypical funded proposal has at least one Excellent and two Very GoodsMany NSF programs have a 10% funding rateSeptember1999October


View Full Document

UMBC CMSC 691 - Proposals

Documents in this Course
NOTES

NOTES

8 pages

OWL

OWL

109 pages

Security

Security

53 pages

SIP

SIP

45 pages

Proposals

Proposals

30 pages

Load more
Download Proposals
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Proposals and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Proposals 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?