UT EE 382C - Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks

Unformatted text preview:

Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor NetworksSensor NetworksIn-Network ProcessingExisting ApproachesExisting Approaches … cont.DEEPADS – A Novel ApproachC-DEEPADSSimulationSensor Node ModelPerformance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation … cont.DiscussionQuestions ??? Comments !!!Modeling In-Network Processing and Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor NetworksAggregation in Sensor NetworksAjay MahimkarEE 382C Embedded Software SystemsProf. B. L. EvansMay 5, 2004Sensor NetworksSensor NetworksMonitor physical environment from remote locationsChallenges–Battery is the most pressing–Deployment of sensors in thousandsNo manual intervention–Design protocols that extend network lifetimeNetwork lifetime is the time at which first node diesIn-Network ProcessingIn-Network ProcessingWhy data aggregation???–Individual sensor readings are of limited use–Delivering large amount of data from all nodes to a central point consumes lot of energyConserves limited energy and bandwidthIncreases system lifetimeExisting ApproachesExisting ApproachesDirected Diffusion [Intanagonwiwat, 2003]LEACH (Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy) [Heinzelman, 2000]–Cluster-Head responsible for data aggregationExisting Approaches … cont.Existing Approaches … cont.PEDAP (Power Efficient Data gathering and Aggregation Protocol) [Tan, 2003]–MST (Minimum Spanning Tree) based routing using energy as the metric–DisadvantagesLocally optimizes energyIncreases end-to-endlatencyDEEPADS – A Novel ApproachDEEPADS – A Novel ApproachDistributed Energy-Efficient Protocol for Aggregation of Data in Sensor Networks (DEEPADS)–Novel approach that globally maximizes the energy and increases system lifetimeSA BGECFDHPEDAPDEEPADS34752632 1C-DEEPADSC-DEEPADSUses Clustering Approach–Two Tier MethodologySensors organize themselves into clusters, each cluster represented by a cluster-headGlobal energy metric similar to DEEDAPCluster-head aggregates data and transmits to the base stationReduces end-to-end latencySimulationSimulationUsing Ptolemy-II, VisualSense and Java–Discrete Event Model–Network Simulation Setup–Environment100 m x 100 m area–Sensors location Uniformly distributed x and y random variablesBattery Energy at Bootstrap 2.0 JEnergy Consumed during TX or RX 50 nJ/bitThreshold Power 6.3 nWTransceiver Maximum Range 50 mMessage Length 500 BytesWavelength 0.325 mHeight of TX & RX antenna 1.5 mGain of TX & RX antenna 0 dBSimulation ParametersSensor Node ModelSensor Node ModelPerformance EvaluationPerformance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation … cont.Performance Evaluation … cont.DiscussionDiscussionResults–DEEPADS & C-DEEPADS perform much better than existing approachesIncrease in the system lifetimeReduction in the total energy consumptionFuture Work–Repeat experiments taking into consideration the sleep mode in sensorsQuestions ???Questions ???Comments !!!Comments


View Full Document

UT EE 382C - Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Modeling In-Network Processing and Aggregation in Sensor Networks 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?