DOC PREVIEW
UA PHL 223 - Nancy Cruzan and Karen Quinlin Cases
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PHL 223 Lecture 2Outline of Current Lecture I. Karin Quinlin CaseII. Nancy Cruzan CaseCurrent LectureKarin Quinlin Case (1975)- 21 years old; healthy- Took drugs at a party which caused anoxia (lack of oxygen to) the brain because she stopped breathing.- She survived but was in a coma (Permanent vegetative state or PVS)o Now, 35,000 patients are in PVSo 280,000 patients are in a minimally conscious state- Quinlin would open her eyes, vomit and moan- She was placed on a ventilator- Her condition became wretched and her family wanted her removed from the ventilator- The catholic hospital refused to “kill” Quinlin- Quinlin’s lawyer argued for the family’s defense and right to remove their daughter from the ventilator- The NJ supreme court withheld that the right to privacy includes the right of a family to let a patient die by withdrawing life support.o “letting die” under the law- After being removed, Quinlin remained alive for 10 more years!These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.Nancy Cruzan Case (1983)- Missouri, 24 years old- Lost control of her car and was thrown into the air 35 feet into a ditch—She was not wearing a seat belt- Anoxia led to PVS- She was kept alive for 7 years—Cost $910,000 (about $2 million in today’s money)- Parents sought to remove her feeding tube- The Missouri court said there must be clear and convincing evidence of the patient’s wishes for the support to be withdrawn. Vocab:- Advance directives:o Living will, values, inventorieso Durable power of attorney- someone who acts for you - The court could not remove her feeding tube- U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Missouri’s ruling- The Supreme Court also held in 1990 that competent patients may decline medical treatment, even if it leads to their death. - Cruzan was actually divorced- When her story became public, people who knew her told the court that Nancy had said that she did not want to live PVS- In 1990 her tube was legally


View Full Document

UA PHL 223 - Nancy Cruzan and Karen Quinlin Cases

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Nancy Cruzan and Karen Quinlin Cases
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Nancy Cruzan and Karen Quinlin Cases and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Nancy Cruzan and Karen Quinlin Cases 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?