DOC PREVIEW
UA PHL 223 - Tuskegee Study, Defense Arguements
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PHL 223 Lecture 34Outline of Current Lecture Tuskegee Timeline Con’t Defenses for the StudyCurrent Lecture1969- CDC committee votes to continue supplyThe Tuskegee physicians (almost all black) agree to never give antibiotics to the subjects1972- Popular press reports on the study- Study ends- 28/399 died- The publicity of the study creates mistrust of doctors among blacks- Institutions that experiment on humans are required to have Institutional Renew Boards1974- a legal settlement )the government has now paid more than 10 million. 1988- 21 subjects still alive having syphilis for 57+ years1997- Clinton applies to 4 of 8 living subjectsBad Science- No central supervision/ no written protocols - Poor record keeping- Subjects got mixed up with controls, who didn’t have syphilis- Some subjects got neosalvarsan or penicillin outside Marion CountyThe “No One Was Harmed Defense”- Kampier- subject no worse off being in the studyThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.- Neosalvarsan was probable worse than no treatment at all- Penicillin is most effective for primary


View Full Document

UA PHL 223 - Tuskegee Study, Defense Arguements

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Tuskegee Study, Defense Arguements
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Tuskegee Study, Defense Arguements and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Tuskegee Study, Defense Arguements 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?