DOC PREVIEW
UMass Amherst PSYCH 380 - taking sides notes

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

TS 14: aversive treatment for psychologically disordered individuals, is it inhumane?Judge Rotenburg Educational Center- Use of physical restraints and aversive conditioning- Graduated Electronic Decelerator (GED)- administers an electric shocko Stronger version of the original SIBIS- JRC philosophy: all behavior can be manipulated through a combination of rewards and punishments (behavior modificaion)o Zero rejection/expulsion policyo All residents are subjected to the same behavior modification techniques (through reward/punishment), regardless of diagnosis or history o Traditional psychological therapies and medication are rarely usedo Punishments = aversives Early on: those who were severely mentally retarded, and those w/ autism were subjected to harsh punishments (pinching, spatula spanking, water sprays, muscle squeezes) Late 1980’s, replaced w/ SIBIS (a machine that delivers a shock w/intention of stopping self-injurious behaviors in children)  largely abandoned in the 1990’s Wanted a machine that delivered a stronger shock for those students who became accustomed to such a small shock  led to the development of the GEDo Behavioral Rehearsal Lesson Students restrained/GED administered as the student is forced to dothe behavior the punishment seeks to eliminate  Staff threatens students and doesn’t say when a shock is being administered  students become extremely terrified  This simply promotes further aggression/fear from studentsYES (MDRI Report)- Vital to pay attention to an individual’s history, as such punishments can do a lot of damage if administered to a trauma victim- Referred to as torture rather than treatment- GED administered for non-problematic behaviors  autistic individuals shocked for simply trying to communicate, swearing, disheveled appearance- Behavioral programming is not sufficiently monitored, and some professionals donot have the appropriate background knowledge for dealing with challenging emotional and behavioral disorders- Aversive treatment cannot treat an underlying emotional disorder/intellectual disability  temporary alleviation of symptoms, no long term results?- GED = health and safety issues- Restraintso Can cause abrasionso Are used simultaneously w/ GED sometimeso Students may be restrained for extended periods of time (weeks, months!)o Used to pressure/coerce students into consenting to the GED- “Limitation of privileges” o Food deprivation to further abuse childreno Food is mashed and sprinkled w/ liver powdero Social isolation is promoted- Maintain strict control among students- Promote an environment filled with fear, pain and punishment- Six unexplained deaths- 1986- aversives are permitted w/ a court ordered treatment plan- Student developed a stage 2 ulcer after receiving upward of 70 shocks from GED- NYSED review: ultimately the effects of punishment on JRC children = increased fear, anxiety or aggressionNO- Take in the most difficult, challenging self-abusive patients- GED is utilized only when positive-only procedures fail (and used rarely)- Individuals have a right to choose aversive therapy to treat behavioral problems- Safe intensive behavioral therapy has freed hundreds from disturbing alternatives- Works effectively for individuals for whom every other treatment has failed- Two second shock to the skin- feels like a pinch, has no side effects, and is extremely effective- GED must be court and physician approved, strictly regulated- About the MDRI reporto Authors took statements from JRC students/parents/affiliates and revised them or took them out of context to seem negative towards JRCo Some facts (ie: it originated in CA) are simply not true (questions the validity of the report)- Demonstrates testimonies from parents and students how the staff is loving/caring,how the GED is actually extremely effective, and how JRC is successful and “curing” those with behavioral problemsTS 5: Do we still need psychiatrists?YES- Promise of mental healthcare for all w/ federally-funded community mental healthcenters- Development of effective psychotherapies - Have studied the brain extensively, and how it may differ from our “mind” and “spirit”- Best equipped to assess if an underactive thyroid gland is not causing one’s anxiety, depression or psychosis - They are medical doctors- take the Hippocratic oath, wear a white coat, understand medical terminology from other physicians, direct responsibility for life and death decisions, 8 years of graduate school- Cost-effective to combine psychotherapy AND medication- There are some things psychiatrists can simply do better- Move towards integrating psychiatry with primary care- Profession needs to redefine itself in ways that are more responsible to the needs of contemporary society  accept constructive criticismNO: not an end to psychiatry, but proposed changes in the way psychiatrists go about their work- Psychiatry has far outstepped its bounds, and has mislabeled and mistreated countless people- “Delusion” of psychiatry is part of society- Psychiatry as a way to label behaviors that are slight variants of the normal, and seek to treat them with chemicals- Society leads people to believe that they have a mental illness when they do not the people know more about drugs than their doctors do?- They should have the communication skills to explain to patients how they can overcome illnesses, or to educate that their complaints are not even an illness- Patients demand medications, regardless of side effects, even when a psychological illness is not present- Drugs are addictive, and patients believe these drugs “fix them” = higher demand- Proper diagnosis and treatment is virtually impossible in the chaotic environment of the inpatient unit- Treat your patient as a fellow peer  if there is mental illness, it will present itselfo Interact more and intervene less- Challenge the “disability” system  people are “too demoralized to give a


View Full Document

UMass Amherst PSYCH 380 - taking sides notes

Download taking sides notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view taking sides notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view taking sides notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?