Front Back
complementary distribution
different environments, no overlap, no difference in meaning, predictable
constrative distribution
same environments, different meaning, not predictable
minimal pair
two words that differ by only one sound
natural classes
groups of rules that pattern together
stridents/siblants
hushing/ hissing sounds
assimilation
one sound becomes more like another
dissimilation
sound becomes less like another
insertion
sound is inserted
deletion
sound is removed
methasis
xy---yx
fortition
strengthening of sound
lentition
weakening of sound
weak
voiced, fricative, aspirated, sonorants
strong
voiceless, plosives, aspirated, obstruents
obstruent
plosive fricative affricate
sonorant
nasal approximant vowels
labial
bilabial and labiodental
coronal
interdental alveolar postalveolar
dorsal
palatal velar
lexical category
part of speech
free morphemes
can occur by themselves
bound morphemes
cannot occur alone
open morphemes
accept new words
closed morphemes
don't accept new words
root
base word
stem
what you attach affixes to
affixes
prefixes, suffixes, etc
reduplication
like---likelike
compounding
blackbird, bookstore
alternation
depth, deep
suppletion
go to went
analytical languages
low morpheme to word ratio
synthetic languages
high morpheme to word ratio 
isolating language
no bound morphemes
aggulating languages
morphemes have exactly one meaning
fusional languages
morphmes have many meanings
solving phonology problems
minimal pairs, natural classes, distribution, state rule, list phonemes, write rule
syntax
word order
semantics
meaning
complements
sometimes optional, can't have more than allowed, have a specific order
adjuncts
always optional, no limit, freely ordered
complement adjunct test
if you exclude it and it doesn't work, it's a complement, if you insert which happened adjuncts make sense 
constituency tests
answer question, coordination, clefting, passivization, omission
lexical ambiguity
words can mean different things
syntactic ambiguity
trees drawn differently because of structure
innateness hypothesis
language ability is innate in humans 
linguistics universals
features shared by all languages 
universal grammar
set of structural characteristics shared by all languages
traits of biologically controlled behaviors
emerge before needed, appear not as a result of conscious choice, not triggered by external events, teaching and practice have little effect, regular sequence of milestones, critical period
critical period
period of development in which language must be acquired, from birth to puberty
imitation theory
claims that kids get language by repeating the speech heard from speakers, fails to account for errors not found in adult speech, children also produce novel utterance which they did not hear from adults
reinforcement theory
claims that children learn to speak correctly on the basis of reinforcement, praises and rewards for correct forms and correction or punishment for incorrect ones, attempts to correct incorrect utterances often fall on deaf ears
connectionist theories
claims children learn language by making neural connections in the brain, these connections develop from hearing and using language, children acquire language and produce forms based not on abstract rules but on statistical patterns, explains outputs like frang to nonsense verbs like frin…
social interaction theory
claims children acquire language through interaction with speakers, children and other adults, keeps the premises that children develop rules and are predisposed towards acquiring language, underscores use of child directed speech, the way adults speak to kids, however kids produce uttera…
high amplitude sucking
infants are given a pacifier which makes makes a sound upon being sucked, initially suck rapidly bc interested in sound,lose interest rapidly
conditioned head turn procedure
child is first conditioned to expect a visual change accompanying change in sound, then when sound is changed, child looks to see if the visual changes after sound change
babbling
producing strings of consonants and vowels, four to six months, initially palatal and bilabial consonants, along with low back unrounded vowels
repeated or canonical babling
seven to ten months same consonants and vowels
variegated babbling
ten to twelve months, different vowels and consonants begin to emergy
children do not produce words consistently until
twelve months
one word stae
holophrastic, one year, child produces single words in isolation, initially nouns, later expanding to include verbs and other words
two word stage
18-24 months, child produces two word utterances, consisting of semantic pairs, no function words or morphemes 
three words utterances built out of
two word utterances
overgeneralization
application of rule to all or nearly all forms where it couldd apply without account for exceptions
negation
children first use no at beginning of sentence, later use any negative word in between subject and verb, then coalesce to adult usage, then learn to use words like anything
interrogation
children use intonation rather than syntax to express questions, at around three the child uses auxiliaries before subject in yes no questions, children produce correct order for wh- questions last
word meaning
children begin producing words around one year, by six, vocal is around 14000 words
complexive concept
semantically non uniform set of objects
overextension
giving a word a wider meaning than in adult language
underextension
giving a word a narrower meaning than is given in adult language
children master nouns at
aruond 6-9 months
proper nouns are mastered
after regular nouns 
bilingual
having native like control of two languages
multilingual
having native like control of more than two languages
simultaneous bilingualism
acquire two languages at once from birth
sequential bilingualism
acquire one language later than the other 
transfer
influence of native language on second langue, can be positive or negative, 
factors influencing success of second language acquisiton
motivation, age, exposure to target language 
mode of communication
medium of transmission
semanticity,
communicative signs have associated meaning, all communication has this
pragmatic function
communication serves a purpose, all communication has this
interchangeability
a communicator can transmit and receive, human communication and many other forms have this, some lack this
cultural transmission
some aspects of the communication must be acquired through interaction with other communicators, human language has this, most animal communication is not
arbitrariness
connection between form and meaning is arbitrary, most animal communication is iconic, some is arbitrary as is human language
discreteness
building up forms out of smaller discrete units, human language is discrete, most animal communications are not
displacement
ability to communicate ideas and about things that are not present, humans can do this, animals cannot 
productivity
infinite possibilities with finite products, human language has this, animal communication doesnt
bee communication
dance to indicate information about food source, circle for close, sickle for farther, tail wagging for further still, repetitions indicate food quality, orientation of dance indicates direction, speed indicates how far in sickle
is bee communication language?
no, bees can only talk about food sources, number of utterances is finite, but there is some arbitrariness, also discrete units
bird communication
uses calls and songs, may indicate a birds location, or may warn of predators, songs typically by male birds only, songs can have different meanings, some variation, but it isn't meaningful variation
primate communication
no displacement or productivity, but vervet monkeys do sometimes cry wolf, do show cultural transmission 
teaching primates language
no successful attempts, primates lack human vocal tract and auditory acuity necessary to hear and produce speech like a human, sign language more successful, but not similar to human proficiency
pets
cannot distinguish human speech sounds, dogs obey simple commands, which are usually paired with gestures and intonations
parrots
can imitate humans speech, not the same as knowing language pepperberg taught parrot to identify shapes, but couldn't speak like humans 
language variety
any form of language characterized by systemic features, including different languages, different dialects of the same language, speech of a single person, speech of a single person in a single context
sociolinguistics
study of relationship between language variety and social structure
idiolect
single speakers variety
dialect
variety of a language which is spoken by a group of speakers and which is noticeable different from the variety spoken by another group of speakers, every person speaks a dialect
speech community
a group of speakers of the same dialect,speech communities may be defined in terms of extra linguistic factors
extralinguistic factor
factor external to language, esx region geography socioeconomic class, age, gender, ethnicity, race 
communicative isolation
where a speech community is relatively isolated from speakers outside of community, relatively rare in modern world
accent
phonetic or phonological variation, every speaker has an accent
dialect vs language
two varieties are said to be dialects of the same language if they are mutually intelligible
mutual intelligibility
speakers of dialect a can understand speakers of dialect b and vice versa
complications
other extralinguistics factors can influence speakers perceptions of whether two varieties are distinct languages or not, dialect continue
dialect continuum
series of dialects where adjecnt dialects are mutually intelligible but dialects on opposite ends of the continuum are not mutually intelligible
speech style
variation based on topic, setting, addressee, context dependent
register
speech style based on formality
style shifting
automatic adjustment of speech style, based on situation, largely non conscious 
jargon
technical language, a language variety differing only in lexical terms
slang
also largely differing in vocabulary
common slang
not particular to a subgroup, lower register, informal
in group slang
particular to a subgroup, used to exclude non-members,
standard vs nonstandard dialects
standard dialects are generally preferred by such speakers as politicians, members of the media, and those belonging to higher socio-economic classes and are taught in schools, non standard dialects deviate from the standard
prestige
social regard for a variety, varieties with higher prestige are thought of a s more desirable
prescriptive standard
standard for making prescriptive judgements
hypercorrection
producing nonstandard forms by false analogy
sae
standard american english, standard dialect in the use, not maintained by a language academy as some of the other standards are 
bidialectical
when speakers of nonstandard dialects learn the standard dialect
phonetic variation
variation in the actual sounds themselves
phonological/phonemic variation
variation in the number of phonemes or distribution of allophones
morphological variation
variation in morphological usage, ex distribution of morphemes or use of entirely different morphemes
syntactic variation
variation in syntactic properties
lexical variation
variation in vocabulary items
regional variation
linguistic variation based on geography
regional dialect
a variety of language particular to speakers of a particular geographic area
isogloss
line marking the boundary of use of one form or rule, a bundle of isoglosses is typically used to differentiate two regional dialects
social dialect
 a variety specific to speakers belonging to a social group, 
socioeconomic variation
commoner in lower class speed are variation
gender variation
women lead linguistic changes, males generally acquire such change a generation behind 
ethnic variation
aave multiple negation, habitual be, chicano english, lumbee
language is often tied to
identity
speakers can use language variety to
signal identity
synchronic language change
at a certain time period
diachronic language change
across time
historical linguistics
field concerned with language change, most specifically with dis chronic change 
proto indo european
single ancestor of the members of the indo european language family
language family
group of languages that share a single ancestor
middle english time period
1100-1500 CE
early modern english time period
1500-1700
contemporary english time period
1750- now
arbitrary language
languages sometimes share similarities because these are features common among languages, sometimes it can be coincidence
non arbitrary language features
sometimes has a relation between sound and meaning, sometimes the result of contact, sometimes languages ae related
relatedness hypothesis
if two languages show a significant amount of similarity, they're likely to be related or to share a common ancestor 
cognates
words of the same source
mother language
ancestor of another language
daughter language
descendent of another language
sister languages
descendants from the same mother language 
protolanguage
earlier common language from which members of a language family descend
family
tree theory, analogizes language relatedness to that of humans, shows descent from a protolanguage to its daughter languages
regularity hypothesis
sound change is regular and exceptionless
wave theory
a different model for representing linguistic relatedness, changes and innovations can spread from one language to nearby ones, accounts for dialect continua 
sound change
includes phonetic and phonemic change
phonetic change
change in pronunciation only 
phonemic/phonological change
affects phonological system, changes in number of phonemes or distribution of allophones
unconditioned sound change
change that occurs at all instances
conditioned sound change
occurs only within a conditioning environment
monophthongization
a diphthong becomes a monophthong
diphthongization
a monophthong becomes a diphthong
raising
a vowel is produced at a higher point in the mouth
lowering
 a vowel is produced at a lower point in the mouth
fronting
a vowel is produced farther front in the mouth
backing
a vowel is produced further back in the mouth
analogical change
change of a form based on another form
sound change is regular but creates
irregularity
analogy is irregular, but creates
regularity
attestation
language is said do be attested if there is direct evidence for it
sound correspondence
relationship between a sound in one language and a sound in a relate language, established through comparison of cognates
reconstruction
estimation of unattested language on the basis of one or more attested language
internal reconstruction
based on data from a single language, reconstructs pre language
comparative language reconstruction
based on comparison of related languages, reconstructs protolanguage
reconstruction depends on the regularity of
sound change
comparative method
the way comparative reconstruction is done, cognate segments are compared with each other to identify sound correspondences
uniformitarian principle
laws and processes at work on language now were present and at work on language in the past

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Login

Join to view and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?