ALED 340: EXAM 3
37 Cards in this Set
| Front | Back |
|---|---|
|
power
|
the capacity to produce efforts on others; the potential to influence others
|
|
what power is not
|
manipulation, intimidation, domination
|
|
two types of power
|
positional and personal
|
|
positional power
|
derived from a given position; comes from the organization
legitimate, reward, and coercive
|
|
personal power
|
derived from the individual characteristics of the leader; person you are as a leader
referent, expert, information, connection
|
|
7 Bases of Power
|
Coercive - Based on fear.
Connection - Based on the leader's connections to powerful individuals.
Reward - Based on the leader's ability to hand out rewards both monetary and non-monetary.
Legitimate - Based on the position held by the leader.
Referent - Based on the likab…
|
|
what are the three outcomes of power?
|
1) commitment- enthusiastic support
2) compliance- going along with
3) resistance- working against an idea
|
|
resistance
|
coercive
|
|
compliance
|
reward, legitimate
|
|
commitment
|
legitimate, referent, expert
|
|
what should leaders remember when dealing with power?
|
1. Share reason and rationale
2. Have patience and stay committed in spite of short-term obstacles
3. Refrain from harsh, hard and forceful traits
4. Maintain your “teachability”
5. Withhold judgment
6. Get to know others
7. Intervene –…
|
|
authority
|
inherent rights of a position in which the person can give orders and expert others to follow those orders
|
|
how does authority relate to the two types of power?
|
positional power comes from organization; personal power comes from followers
|
|
Impacts of misusing authority
|
can seriously disturb interpersonal relationships, and can erode group relationships and productivity
|
|
12 abuses of authority
|
1. set up barriers
2. use people as tools
3. does not check self
4. sticks to his/her own level
5. use special language
6. eliminates opposition
7. shows pseudo humility
8. stresses rules and conformities
9. dichotomizes
10. enjoys no real relationship with subordinates
11. gets…
|
|
LMX
|
relationship between leaders and followers
|
|
how did researchers treat leadership prior to LMX?
|
researchers treated leadership as something leaders did toward all of their followers
|
|
In-group
|
based on expanded and negotiated role responsibilities.
1. Willing to do more
2. Innovative approaches
3. Get more responsibility
4. Receive more opportunity
5. Get time/support from leader
|
|
out-group
|
based on the formal employment contract.
1. Operate strict to prescribed roles
2. Do only what is required
3. Get fair treatment but no special attention
4. Get standard benefits
|
|
leadership making
|
prescriptive approach to leadership emphasizing that a leader should develop high-quality exchanges with all subordinates rather than just a few; attempt to make every follower feel like they're in in-group
high quality relationships with ALL subordinates
|
|
three stages in leadership making
|
stranger phase, acquaintance phase, mature partnership phase
|
|
stranger phase
|
rule bound, contractual relationship, lower quality exchanges, motives of subordinate directed towards self-interest
|
|
acquaintance phase
|
sharing more resources, testing period for subordinates (take on more roles and responsibilities), and new ways of relating
|
|
mature partnership phase
|
high degree of mutual respect, can depend on each other, and move beyond own self-interest
|
|
How can leaders apply LMX?
|
to be aware of how you perceive members of your own team.
directs managers to assess their leadership from a relationship persepective
|
|
transactional leadership
|
quid-pro-quo (this for that)
I will give you this thing you need if you give me what I need
|
|
transformational leadership
|
leaders engage with others, form strong relationships, raise level of motivation and morality in both the leader and follower;
seek overtly to transform the organization
|
|
pseudotransfromational leadership
|
refers to leaders who are transforming, but in a negative way. self consumed, exploitative, power-oriented, warped moral values
|
|
What are the two types of factors that affect transactional leadership?
|
1.) contigent rewards
2.) management by exception (MBE)
|
|
contingent rewards
|
effort by followers is exchanged for specific rewards
|
|
management-by-exception
|
corrective criticism, negative feedback, negative reinforcement
active (leader watches closely for mistakes and takes action)
passive (Leader intervenes only after standards have not been met or problems have occurred
|
|
What are the factors of transformational leadership?
|
1.Idealized Influence(II)
2.InspirationalMotivation (IM)
3.IntellectualStimulation (IS)
4.IndividualizedConsideration (IC)
|
|
idealized influence
|
1. Strong role model
2. High standards of ethical conduct
3. High degree of trust
4. Excellent vision for future
|
|
inspirational motivation (charisma)
|
1. High expectations
2. Encourages “followers” to be part of the vision
3. Great communicator
|
|
intellectual stimulation
|
1. Challenge system
2. Encourage creativity
3. “followers” think on own to solve problems
4. Support innovations
|
|
Individualized consideration
|
1. Listen to “followers”
2. Coach and advise
3. Delegate for “follower” growth
|
|
what is the non-leadership factor?
|
diverges farther from transactional leadership and represents behaviors that are nontransactional
Laissez Faire (represents the absence of leadership, "hands off, let-things-ride" approach, no exchange with followers or attempt to help them grow)
|
ALED 340: EXAM 3