Behavioral Models ofBehavioral Models of LeadershippUniversity of Iowa StudiesOhio State University StudiesO o State U e s ty Stud esUniversity of Michigan StudiesObjectivesObjectivesExamine the task & relationship studies inExamine the task & relationship studies in historical context Explore task & relationship leader behaviorspp Understand each model of leader behaviorIdentify positive & negative aspects of modelsIdentify positive & negative aspects of modelsSetting the SceneSetting the SceneTrait ApproachTrait Approach ‘Great Man’PersonalityPersonality Behavioral ApproachTwo primary behaviorsTwo primary behaviors Task-oriented Relationship-orientedLeader BehaviorsLeader Behaviors Task Relationship Gives direction to group Sets standardsp Is friendly & open Builds community Makes plans Defines roles & jobsClarifies goals & tasks Listens to suggestions Self-disclosesShows concern for othersClarifies goals & tasks Focuses on accomplishment of assignmentShows concern for others Encourages others to achieve the goals they have set collaborativelyassignmentset collaborativelyUniversity of IowaUniversity of IowaKurt LewinKurt Lewin Polish Jew living in Germany under Hitler Managed to escape & came to U.S.gp Fascinated by group dynamics Studied leadership in groups of boys at campUniversity of Iowa Studies y(1930s)Autocratic (Directive)Autocratic (Directive) Leader tells “what, when, why, & how” of taskFollowers do what they’re toldFollowers do what they re told Democratic (Participative)Leader seeks input about task from groupLeader seeks input about task from group Followers & leader are equalLaissez-faire (Delegative)Laissezfaire (Delegative) Leader lets followers make all decisions Followers do what they think is besto o e s do at t ey t s bestA Continuum of ControlA Continuum of ControlAutocraticLaissez-FaireDemocraticAutocraticLaissezFaireDemocraticFindingsFindingsAutocraticAutocratic High productivityHostility, aggression, blamingHostility, aggression, blaming DemocraticFairly high productivityFairly high productivity Camaraderie, creativity, consideration Laissez-faireLaissezfaire Low productivity Demanding, argumentativeeadg,aguetateOhio State University StudiesOhio State University StudiesRalph StogdillRalph Stogdill Contracted by the U.S. military to study effective leadership Industrial contexts Military contexts Goal was to find a universal leadership modelOhio State University Studies(1940s-y1960s)Initiating StructureInitiating Structure Leader organizes & structures work Defines follower roles & schedules work activities Followers do what they’re told Consideration Leader builds rapport, trust, & respect Nurtures followers & is collaborative Followers participate in making decisionsBest of Both Worlds!Best of Both Worlds!Hi h C id tiHigh StructureHigh ConsiderationLow Structure Low ConsiderationFindingsFindingsInconclusiveInconclusive Some research indicated high consideration and high structure was idealg Not enough research support for this premise Best leadership style seemed contingent on the conte tcontextUniversity of Michigan StudiesUniversity of Michigan StudiesDaniel Katz & Rensis LikertDaniel Katz & Rensis Likert Interested in managementStudied the effect of leader behaviors on smallStudied the effect of leader behaviors on small groups Organizational & contextsUniversity of Michigan Studiesyg(!940s-1960s)Production OrientationProduction Orientation Leader emphasizes technical aspects of workUtilitarian view of followers–they are merelyUtilitarian view of followers they are merely the tools for completing the work Employee Orientationpy Leader emphasizes the personal aspects of work Views followers as unique, attends to their personal needsBest of Both Worlds IIBest of Both Worlds IIHigh ProductionLow EmployeeHigh EmployeeLow EmployeeHigh EmployeeLow ProductionFindingsFindingsInconclusiveInconclusive Some consistency in support of a high-task/high-relationship stylegy Most research indicates that style depends on situationQuick ReviewQuick ReviewIowaIowa Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-faireOhioOhio Initiating structure, ConsiderationMichiganMichigan Production Orientation, Employee
View Full Document