UW-Milwaukee ART 100 - Required Paper- Learning Object

Unformatted text preview:

Raoul Deal [email protected] Art 100 Required Paper- Learning Object Due date: Wednesday, 4-13-2022Word document must be submitted in the “ASSIGNMENTS” area in Canvas by 11:59pm. on the date it is due.Activities:Explore the Required Paper (Learning Object) Overview S-22 linked to your Canvas HOME pageOnce you are ready to begin you should browse the artworks at the bottom of the page. You'll notice that when clicking on a pair of images, you'll be redirected to a page with only two artworks juxtaposed on your screen. Select two of these pairings to compare and contrast. This means that you will analyze a total of four works. Organize your thoughts into a short paper (1000 word minimum).Assignment Requirements: 1. To compare and contrast TWO pairs of images for formal elements (describesimilarities and differences in appearance) and content (meanings you think theartist is trying to convey). You must use at least five of the six aestheticperspectives during the course of your analysis (two or three per pairing).2. To present effective arguments in support of the aesthetic perspectives you chooseto apply (remember examples from class). Effective arguments are coherent, wellthought out, and correspond to the critical objectives of the paper.3. To present historical background material about each of these pieces and relate thisto your choices of aesthetic perspectives.4. To make full use of the writing guidelines laid out in the “Writing Checklist” below.Writing Checklist: Please adhere to the following 10 pt. checklist. This will make grading faster so that we can post your grades sooner. • Each paragraph has a topic sentence and one main idea, and contributes to myoverall analysis.• I have a concluding paragraph that gives closure to my thoughts.• I have checked my paper with a standard spelling and grammar checker andcorrected all mechanical errors.• I have typed my paper in 12 pt New Times Roman font.• Each time I mentioned an aesthetic perspective, I typed it in bold letters.• I did not write my paper in the first person (use the word “I”).• While writing in the 1st person can be extraordinarily engaging, it sometimesdistorts objective critical analysis with subjective information and personalanecdote.• I have maintained a clear, concise writing style by using simple sentencestructures. Hints:o In each sentence, use as few words as possible, but all the words you need.o Read your paper out loud before printing it out. Many mistakes can becorrected by taking this simple step.• I have checked my word count with word processing software, and it is at least1000 words, and I have noted it in the upper right hand corner of my paper. Donot include your bibliographic information when you calculate your word count.• I cited my sources properly using MLA or APA style. Do not use Wikipedia asone of your sources.. Here is the bibliographic info for the book linked to your learning object assignment sheet formatted for MLA style. Stewart, Marilyn D. Thinking through Aesthetics. Worcester, Massachusetts: Davis Publications, 1997. Print. Writing Center In addition to useful links to the standard guidelines for citing sources, this is where you can find information about UWM’s Writing Center now operating online in real time! Bibliography FAQs This is a very useful document.Here is another useful site with indications about citing sources: easybibRubric for Required Paper, Aesthetics Learning Object Objectives Low Performance At or Below Average At or Above Average Exemplary Performance Earned Points To analyze TWO PAIRS of images for form and content, to use at least five aesthetic perspectives and to compare and contrast the images in each grouping. 0 points Students only analyzed one pair of images. 4 points Students analyzed two pairs of images without comparing and contrasting, or used less than four aesthetic perspectives. 5 points Students analyzed two pairs of images and compared and contrasted them, but only used four aesthetic perspectives in the discussion. 6 points Students analyzed two pairs of images, and used at least five aesthetic perspectives compared and contrasted images in each grouping. To present effective arguments in support of the aesthetic perspectives you chose to apply. 0 points Student misunderstood most of the aesthetic perspectives discussed. 4 points Student misunderstood some of the aesthetic perspectives discussed. 5 points Student understood all of the aesthetic perspectives, but did not develop arguments sufficiently. 6 points Student presented well thought out arguments and understood all of the aesthetic perspectives. To present historical background material about each piece, and relate this to your choices of aesthetic perspectives. 0 points No historical background information was presented. 4 points Student presented historical background about some of the images. 5 points Student presented historical background about all of the images but did not relate it to their aesthetic arguments. 6 points Student presented historical background about all images, and related this information to their aesthetic arguments. To follow the guidelines listed in the “Writing Checklist.” 3 points Student followed all but three or less of the guidelines well. 4 points Student followed all but two of the guidelines well. 5 points Student followed all but one of the guidelines well. 6 points Student followed all of the guidelines perfectly. Total Score (plus 1 free


View Full Document
Download Required Paper- Learning Object
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Required Paper- Learning Object and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Required Paper- Learning Object 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?