DOC PREVIEW
UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Choosing an Experimental Design

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Psych 325 1st Edition Lecture 25 -Choosing an Experimental DesignoUse between subjects if…-IV has a permanent effectEX: Festinger $1/$20 cognitive dissonance study (the psychological tension linked with the $1 condition would carry over to the $20 condition-"Wait, I just lied about liking this boring task for $1. I better say that I liked it for $20EX: clinical intervention - each participant gets the treatment at some point of the experimentArousal (BETWEEN: Low OR moderately OR high) x Type of mood induction (WITHIN: each participant gets positive and negative mood)-Treatments will confound studyoUse within subjects if…-Studying changes over time-Expect lots of individual differencesoCan also use a mixed design-At least one IV is within-At least one IV is between-Placebo effecto(i.e. finding ideal dosages for a new pain medication)oSay that you give all back pain patients a pill so that each patient is randomly assigned toone dosage conditions-A placebo group is a special type of control group that assesses whether the "psychological" benefit of the experiment treatment explains differences in DV scores-In the example, if the "0" milligram group had an average pain rating of 2 then we would suspect a placebo effect. That is, just taking a pill that participants will reduce their pain causes them to report lower pain levels (equal to the ratings of the "300" milligram group). Thus, we have to seriously question the efficacy of our experimental drugoStatistical power-Definition: the level of confidence that a significant effect is really significant-Three ways to increase statistical power in research designsAdd more participants (more participants per cell decreases person confounds)Increase effect sizes (i.e. increase differences in DV scores across conditions of IV)Lower the criterion (i.e. have a stronger standard for statistical significance)These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.-Say the one-way two group between-subject effect for level of arousal on number of condom references is not quite statistically significant (p<.08; adult mean = 5; fishing mean = 15)-If we added more participants to each of the two conditions and made the adult video more provocative we could increase our odds that the two experimental conditions are producing different outcomes (i.e. reduce criterion p below .05)-By reducing our standard for statistical significance from a p < .05 to a p < .01 wecould further increase our odds that the differences between the two group means are


View Full Document

UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Choosing an Experimental Design

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Choosing an Experimental Design
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Choosing an Experimental Design and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Choosing an Experimental Design 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?