DOC PREVIEW
UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Chapter Five: How Do We Misinterpret?

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Psych 325 1st Edition Lecture 14-Finish Chapter 5: Common Threats to ValidityoRecap Part 2: Validity Threats: people changeoPart 3: The process of studying people changes people-Brief Exam 2 Review session-Regression to the Mean-Hawthorne Effect: when you're in an environment where a supervisor or leader is watching your performance automatically improves-Mere Measurement Effect: you change your behavior simply because you were asked tooBlood pressure may improve just because you participate in a studyoPeople become less depressed simply by volunteering for studies-Just knowing you are in a study can change you-Testing EffectoOn most tests,, you'll improve if you take it a second timeoWhy-Practice-LearningoWhy is this a problem?oWhat is the solution? -Attitude polarizationoIf you watch CNN or Fox or any news shows you should be familiar with thisoPeople disagree a lot about controversial topics (like abortion)-As we keep asking you about your opinions toward abortion your answers will become more extreme Intervention-->Test-->TestNo Intervention-->Test-->TestImprovement masquerades the effect -Experimental Mortality/AttritionoPeople may leave your study or fail to return for follow-upoWhen is this a problem for external validity?oWhen is this a problem for internal validity?oWhat is the solution?-Longitudinal study: study over a long period of timeoCould be within a number of a day or a few weeks or monthsoWhen people are studied over a long period of time they have more of a likelihood of dropping out of the study-Why?People are lazy, worn out, tired, malicious people, move away, oExperimental Mortality/Attrition example:-Study over 24 weeksThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.Recruit 100 people for fitness assessmentYou think your exercise intervention is going to improve people's fitness who are "unfit"Pre-test-->treatment-->Post-testMeasure fitness on a 0-10 scale (100 people)-->exercise intervention-->Measure fitness on same scale (50 people)This is homogeneous attrition because in the control group the same amount of people drop out-Heterogeneous attritionAfter post-test N=15 but in control group after post-test N=90oYou want to do everything you can to reduce attrition-Do everything you can to keep participants


View Full Document

UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Chapter Five: How Do We Misinterpret?

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Chapter Five: How Do We Misinterpret?
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Chapter Five: How Do We Misinterpret? and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Chapter Five: How Do We Misinterpret? 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?