DOC PREVIEW
UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Moving From Fact to Truth: Validity, Reliability, and Measurement

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Psych 325 1st Edition Lecture 6Chapter Two Continued-Sources of Guidance on Ethical Issues-Informed Consent Statement for "Person Perception Study"oScreen patients if the experiment has dangerous tendencies (fantasizing about suicide) othe study could prime their thoughtsoMust consider risks<benefits-Levels of privacyoAnonymity: no way we can figure out who's who (name, ID, address) completely anonymous-Subjects are more likely to be honestoConfidentiality: information is privileged to the researcher. Subjects info is in their handsonly-Debriefing oIf you ask about subjects suicidal thoughts for exampleoMust inform of:-Purpose of the study-Probe for distressPeople are sensitive so if you must understand and go through stress protocol before they leave (if need be)-Curiosity Respect that people may want to knowChapter 3, Part 1: An Introduction to the Validity Family-FACT---------> TRUTH-Measures we use include some degree of error-Best actress of all time example-Identifying true causes for behavior: HARD TO DO-Ice cream sales--------------> Number of murdersoHeat/temp, time of the year, war, crowding, conflicts-All correlated, measures co-vary but this does not mean causationoConstruct validity: are you measuring what you think you are?oAggression: blasts of noise, not helping, electric shocks, verbalExam 1 ReviewChapter One-What we as researchers like to do is make general statements as to why things occur: theories-Exercise: more stress leads to worse health (theoretical statement)oIn order to test if that theory has validity, you need a hypothesis-Experiment--> YOU manipulate variables/control how much subjects getThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.Increased stress--anger recall (catching your partner with another person)=increased HRDecreased stress--relaxation (breathing deeply)=decreased HR-Correlational study--> measured, occur naturally/no manipulation, health outcome is naturalHigher scores on life events will be associated with increased HR-MANIPULATION VS. ASSOCIATION-Parsimonious: simplicity=good theory-There is no perfect theoryPeople who have resilient personalities: stress is not detrimental-Difference between basic and applied research: one question on the exam-Testability is synonymous with falsifiability -Operational definitions-Not much about history on exam-We as human beings like to see the logical order of things: determinism (understand the logic to that)Chapter Two-Three types of hypothesis testing-Essence of validation: positive test bias and behavioral confirmation (Festinger vs. Bem)-Reasons you should care about ethics-30 multiple choice


View Full Document

UW-Milwaukee PSYCH 325 - Moving From Fact to Truth: Validity, Reliability, and Measurement

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Moving From Fact to Truth: Validity, Reliability, and Measurement
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Moving From Fact to Truth: Validity, Reliability, and Measurement and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Moving From Fact to Truth: Validity, Reliability, and Measurement 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?