DOC PREVIEW
CSU SPCM 201 - Exam 1 Study Guide

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 10 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Rhetoric in Western Thought Study Guide #1February 17, 2015 Examples of early non-Western rhetoriThe story of the “invention” of rhetori (i.e. what happened in Syrause?) Mayan Culture 2000 B.C.E.  Structure society One of the first groups to write Bantu 2000 B.C.E.  Oral story telling Magic words- Use words in the right way China  1500 B.C.E. Relationships between when to talk and when to listen Greece  Renaissance  Enlightenment  Came up with rhetoric system  Tyrants of Syracuse story  City is taken over by tyrants Overthrown  No records (can’t prove anything) Court was created to divvy up possessions after 50 years- “Naturally good speakers seemed to get more ‘stuff’ then deserved” - Court didn’t have any way to deal with it  Corax and Tisias  The importane of probability (eikos) in early rhetorial history Eikos (probability)  The reliance on reason in an uncertain situation, to determine the most likely outcome Why does eikos seem like the best form of decision making in the situation in Syracuse?  No witnesses The parable of the weak man and strong man The parable of the weak man and the strong man story  Two men (1 weak, 1 strong) get into a fight Someone stops them and brings them to court Both claim it was not their fault  Weak man says he would not win in a fight. “Look at me! Why would I start a fight” he saysRhetoric in Western Thought Study Guide #1February 17, 2015 Strong man says he knows he is strong and would not pick a fight knowing he would get trouble Both are probable situations; weak man’s argument is better and he wins  Who is Corax and what is his ontribution to rhetori?Corax, the crow We don’t know if he even existed  Not a lot of evidence  Reputation of naturally good speaking  Smart  See within situations - Help people make money Teaches people to speak well and charges money- His students did well which lead to the spread of the system and instruction of rhetoric  Who are the Sophists and what is their approah to rhetori? Group of people who were interested in studying different types of knowledge  Explore human development  The Sophists = “the wise” Traveling band of teachers  Make student successful; including rhetoric Teachers  Taught rhetoric—words  Got paid  Students end up being sons of people in high places—aristocrats Similar to Corax Relied on probability  Believed in absolute truth and was unknowledgeable or inaccessible  Also believed in contingent truth  Contingent truth  Let the people decide it’s true Ex: does God exist  Focused on practicalities of human affairs  Urged expertise in dissoi logoi  Means 2 arguments/2 sides Good at teaching this You would be successful if you could argue both sides- Pre-judge the other side- Prepared- Sophists get to pick side  Which ever side that will be more beneficial to them  Get paid (lawyer)Rhetoric in Western Thought Study Guide #1February 17, 2015 Corax began to push rhetoric outside of the court room What are Gorgias’s ontributions to rhetori? Gorgias Very good public speaker Improvisation—took on suggestions from the crowd Invited to festivals, ceremonies, etc. to speak Certain way he speaks that is mesmerizing Well regarded, becomes rich and famous Became what we call The Sophists The Encomium for Helen: what is it about?  Who is Helen? Princess that was abducted and taken to Troy Situation started Trojan war What are its major arguments?  What kind of speech do you think an encomium is? Speech to say person is of value, culture, important Speech is given in Helen’s honor by Gorgias Why should Helen be forgiven? She was taken by force- Rape Gorgias tried to convince everyone that words are just as powerful as actions Rhetoric can be good but can also be used for bad - Persuasion through words Did she love him? God said it was fate What does it teah us about rhetori? Use rhetoric as a form of self defense  Who is Aspasia’s and how does she at rhetorially in a world in whih women are not supposed to be rhetoriians?  Little is known  Some don’t think she existed  “The invisible woman” Trained in rhetoric—like Gorgias- Used to gain power  Difficult to be a woman in Athens Aspasia wasn’t from AthensRhetoric in Western Thought Study Guide #1February 17, 2015- Northern city state I Macedonia Gave her ability to be taught  Moved when she was an adult and won over men with her quick mind and sharp tongue Written in books as prostitutes because people did not believe women could be smart Became logographer (speech writer) for Athens most powerful man—Pericles  What distinguishes Isorates from other Sophists? A “later” Sophist Questioned what philosophy was  Taught students rhetoric for a fee Rebuilt family with this money after a war Did not travel, but opened the first school for rhetoric in the Athens  Different levels of rhetoric  Was not a show off - Very serious  What is kairos? The Allegory of the Cave and its lessonsAbsolute truth vs. ontingent truth(s)/ knowledge vs. beliefWhat is the Sorati Method? How does it work? Allegory: an expression by means of symbolic functional figures and actions of truths or generalizations about human existence; an instance of such expression; a symbolic representation Prisoners, bound and can only see forward Directed at a wall with shadows  Shadows come from fire  Made behind them They see animals, artifacts  People behind them are talking and prisoners assume the shadows are talking  Allegory of the cave is largely about truth  According to Plato, people like the Sophists  People rely on others to know how the world works Philosophers believe there are two universes—one that is artificial and one isthe absolute truth  We may all begin our lives in the cave We can break free of what others are trying to present the world as and see it for what it really is What are your responsibilities once you’re out of the caveWhat do we learn from the Allegory of the cave? “From” and the Perfect worldRhetoric in Western Thought Study Guide #1February 17, 2015 The world is


View Full Document

CSU SPCM 201 - Exam 1 Study Guide

Download Exam 1 Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?