DOC PREVIEW
CMU CS 10601 - lecture 23

This preview shows page 1-2-3-18-19-36-37-38 out of 38 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 38 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Computational biology: Sequence alignment and profile HMMs10-601 Machine Learning2Central dogmaProteinmRNADNAtranscriptiontranslationCCTGAGCCAACTATTGATGAAPEPTIDECCUGAGCCAACUAUUGAUGAA3Central dogmaProteinmRNADNAtranscriptiontranslationCCTGAGCCAACTATTGATGAAPEPTIDECCUGAGCCAACUAUUGAUGAACan be measured using sequencing techniquesCan be measured using microarraysCan be measured using mass spectrometry4Comparison of Different Organisms Genome size Num. of genesE. coli .05*1084,200Yeast .15*1086,000Worm 1*10818,400Fly 1.8*10813,600Human 30*10825,000Plant 1.3*10825,0005Growth in biological dataLu et al Bioinformatics 20096Assigning function to proteins• One of the main goals of molecular (and computational) biology.• There are 25000 human genes and the vast majority of their functions is still unknown• Several ways to determine function- Direct experiments (knockout, overexpression)- Interacting partners- 3D structures- Sequence homologyHardEasier7Function from sequence homology• We have a query gene: ACTGGTGTACCGAT• Given a database containing genes with known function, our goal is to find similar genes from this database (possibly in another organism)• When we find such gene we predict the function of the query gene to be similar to the resulting database gene• Problems- How do we determine similarity?8Sequence analysis techniques• A major area of research within computational biology.• Initially, based on deterministic or heuristic alignment methods• More recently, based on probabilistic inference methods9Sequence analysis• Traditional- Dynamic programming• Probabilsitic- Profile HMMs10Pairwise sequence alignmentACATTGAACATTA C A T T GA A C A T TAGCCTTAGCATTA G C C T TA G C A T T11Pairwise sequence alignmentAGCCTTACCATTA G C C T TA C C A T TAGCCTTAGCATTA G C C T TA G C A T T• We cannot expect the alignments to be perfect.• Major reasons include insertion, deletion and substitutions.• We need to allow gaps in the resulting alignment.12Scoring AlignmentsjxixjiqqIyxP )|,(iyxiipMyxP )|,()log(),(,babaqqpbas • Alignments can be scored by comparing the resulting alignment to a background (random) model. Independent RelatedScore for alignment:),(iiiyxsSwhere:Can be computed for each pair of letters13Scoring AlignmentsjxixjiqqIyxP )|,(iyxiipMyxP )|,()log(),(,babaqqpbas • Alignments can be scored by comparing the resulting alignment to a background (random) model. Independent RelatedScore for alignment:),(iiiyxsSwhere:In other words, we are trying to find an alignment that maximizes the likelihood ratio of the aligned pair compared to the background model14Computing optimal alignment: The Needham-Wuncsh algorithmF(i-1,j-1) F(i-1,j)F(i,j-1) F(i,j)F(i,j) = maxF(i-1,j-1)+s(xi,xj)F(i-1,j)+dF(i,j-1)+dA G C C T TACCATTd is a penalty for a gap15ExampleA G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1C -2C -3A -4T -5T -6Assume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -116ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1F(i,j) = maxF(i-1,j-1)+s(xi,xj)F(i-1,j)+dF(i,j-1)+dA G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1C -2C -3A -4T -5T -617ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1A G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1 0C -2 0C -3A -4T -5T -6F(i,j) = maxF(i-1,j-1)+s(xi,xj)F(i-1,j)+dF(i,j-1)+d18ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1A G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4C -2 0 -1C -3 -1A -4 -2T -5 -3T -6 -4F(i,j) = maxF(i-1,j-1)+s(xi,xj)F(i-1,j)+dF(i,j-1)+d19ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1A G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4C -2 0 -1 1 0 -1 -2C -3 -1 -2 0 2 1 0A -4 -2 -3 -1 1 0 -1T -5 -3 -4 -2 0 2 1T -6 -4 -5 -3 -1 1 320ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1A G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4C -2 0 -1 1 0 -1 -2C -3 -1 -2 0 2 1 0A -4 -2 -3 -1 1 0 -1T -5 -3 -4 -2 0 2 1T -6 -4 -5 -3 -1 1 321ExampleAssume a simple model where S(a,b) = 1 if a=b and -5 otherwise.Also, assume that d = -1A G C C T T0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6A -1 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4C -2 0 -1 1 0 -1 -2C -3 -1 -2 0 2 1 0A -4 -2 -3 -1 1 0 -1T -5 -3 -4 -2 0 2 1T -6 -4 -5 -3 -1 1 3A G C C T TA C C A T T22Running time• The running time of an alignment algorithms if O(n2)• This doesn’t sound too bad, or is it?• The time requirement for doing global sequence alignment is too high in many cases.• Consider a database with tens of thousands of sequences. Looking through all these sequences for the best alignment is too time consuming.• In many cases, a much faster heuristic approach can achieve equally good results.23Sequence analysis• Traditional- Dynamic programming• Probabilsitic- Profile HMMs24Protein families• Proteins can be classified into families (and further into sub families etc.)• A specific family includes proteins with similar high level functions• For example:- Transcription factors- Receptors- Etc.Family assignment is an important first step towards function prediction25Methods for Characterizing a Protein Family• Objective: Given a number of related sequences, encapsulate what they have in common in such a way that we can recognize other members of the family. • Some standard methods for characterization:– Multiple Alignments– Regular Expressions– Consensus Sequences– Hidden Markov Models26Multiple Alignment Process• Process of aligning three or more sequences with each other• We can determine such alignment by generalizing the algorithm to align two sequences• Running time exponential in the number of sequences27Training a HMM from an existing alignment– Start with a predetermined number of states accounting for matches, insertions and deletions.– For each position in the model, assign a column in the multiple alignment that is relatively conserved.– Emission probabilities are set according to amino acid counts in columns.– Transition probabilities are set according to how many sequences make use of a given delete or insert state.MLE estimates28Remember the simple example• Chose six positions in model.• Highlighted area was selected to be modeled by an insert due to variability.• Can also do neat tricks for picking length of model,


View Full Document

CMU CS 10601 - lecture 23

Documents in this Course
lecture

lecture

40 pages

Problem

Problem

12 pages

lecture

lecture

36 pages

Lecture

Lecture

31 pages

Review

Review

32 pages

Lecture

Lecture

11 pages

Lecture

Lecture

18 pages

Notes

Notes

10 pages

Boosting

Boosting

21 pages

review

review

21 pages

review

review

28 pages

Lecture

Lecture

31 pages

lecture

lecture

52 pages

Review

Review

26 pages

review

review

29 pages

Lecture

Lecture

37 pages

Lecture

Lecture

35 pages

Boosting

Boosting

17 pages

Review

Review

35 pages

lecture

lecture

32 pages

Lecture

Lecture

28 pages

Lecture

Lecture

30 pages

lecture

lecture

29 pages

leecture

leecture

41 pages

lecture

lecture

34 pages

review

review

38 pages

review

review

31 pages

Lecture

Lecture

41 pages

Lecture

Lecture

15 pages

Lecture

Lecture

21 pages

Lecture

Lecture

38 pages

Notes

Notes

37 pages

lecture

lecture

29 pages

Load more
Download lecture 23
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view lecture 23 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view lecture 23 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?