DOC PREVIEW
CMU CS 10601 - review

This preview shows page 1-2-14-15-30-31 out of 31 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 31 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Review•Multiclass logistic regression•Priors, conditional MAP logistic regression•Bayesian logistic regression‣MAP is not always typical of posterior‣posterior predictive can avoid overfitting!"!#!$ " $ #"!%!&!'"'&!!"!#" "#"!"""$!"$%"$&"$'#1Review•Finding posterior predictive distribution often requires numerical integration‣uniform sampling‣importance sampling‣parallel importance sampling•These are all Monte-Carlo algorithms‣another well-known MC algorithm coming up2Application: SLAMEliazar and Parr, IJCAI-033Parallel ISParallel IS•Final estimate:32Parallel IS•Pick N samples Xi from proposal Q(X)•If we knew Wi = P(Xi)/Q(Xi), could do IS•Instead, set !and, •Then: 314Parallel IS is biased0 1 2 300.511.522.53mean(weights)1 / mean(weights)E(mean(weights))E(¯W )=Z, but E(1/¯W ) !=1/Z in general5−2 −1 0 1 2−2−1012Q :(X, Y ) ∼ N(1, 1) θ ∼ U(−π, π)f(x, y, θ)=Q(x, y, θ)P (o =0.8 | x, y, θ)/Z6−2 −1 0 1 2−2−1012PosteriorE(X, Y, θ) = (0.496, 0.350, 0.084)7SLAM revisited•Uses a recursive version of parallel importance sampling: particle filter‣each sample (particle) = trajectory over time‣sampling extends trajectory by one step‣recursively update importance weights and renormalize‣resampling trick to avoid keeping lots of particles with low weights8Particle filter example9Monte-Carlo revisited•Recall: wanted•Would like to search for areas of high P(x)•But searching could bias our estimatesEP(g(X)) =!g(x)P (x)dx =!f(x)dx10Markov-Chain Monte Carlo•Randomized search procedure•Produces sequence of RVs X1, X2, …‣Markov chain: satisfies Markov property•If P(Xt) small, P(Xt+1) tends to be larger•As t → ∞, Xi ~ P(X)•As Δ → ∞, Xt+Δ ⊥ Xt11Markov chain12Stationary distribution13Markov-Chain Monte Carlo•As t → ∞, Xi ~ P(X); as Δ → ∞, Xt+Δ ⊥ Xt •For big enough t and Δ, an approximately i.i.d. sample from P(X) is‣{ Xt, Xt+Δ, Xt+2Δ, Xt+3Δ, … }•Can use i.i.d. sample to estimate EP(g(X))•Actually, don’t need independence:14Metropolis-Hastings•Way to design chain w/ stationary dist’n P(X)•Basic strategy: start from arbitrary X•Repeatedly tweak X to get X’‣If P(X’) ≥ P(X), move to X’‣If P(X’) ≪ P(X), stay at X‣In intermediate cases, randomize15Proposal distribution•Left open: what does “tweak” mean?•Parameter of MH: Q(X’ | X)•Good proposals explore quickly, but remain in regions of high P(X)•Optimal proposal?16MH algorithm•Initialize X1 arbitrarily•For t = 1, 2, …:‣Sample X’ ~ Q(X’ | Xt)‣Compute p =‣With probability min(1, p), set Xt+1 := X’‣else Xt+1 := Xt•Note: sequence X1, X2, … will usually contain duplicates17Acceptance rate•Want acceptance rate (avg p) to be large, so we don’t get big runs of the same X•Want Q(X’ | X) to move long distances (to explore quickly)•Tension between long moves and P(accept):18Mixing rate, mixing time•If we pick a good proposal, we will move rapidly around domain of P(X)•After a short time, won’t be able to tell where we started•This is short mixing time = # steps until we can’t tell which starting point we used•Mixing rate = 1 / (mixing time)19MH example−1−0.500.51−1−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.60.81012345YXf(X,Y)20MH example−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1−1−0.500.5121In example•g(x) = x2•True E(g(X)) = 0.28…•Proposal: •Acceptance rate 55–60%•After 1000 samples, minus burn-in of 100:final estimate 0.282361final estimate 0.271167final estimate 0.322270final estimate 0.306541final estimate 0.308716Q(x!| x)=N(x!| x, 0.252I)22Gibbs sampler•Special case of MH•Divide X into blocks of r.v.s B(1), B(2), …•Proposal Q:‣pick a block i uniformly‣sample XB(i) ~ P(XB(i) | X¬B(i))•Useful property: acceptance rate p = 123Gibbs example−0.8−0.6−0.4 −0.20 0.20.40.6 0.81 1.2−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.200.20.40.60.824Gibbs example−1.5−1 −0.5 0 0.51 1.5−1−0.500.5125Gibbs failure example−6−4 −202 46−5−4−3−2−101234526Relational learning•Linear regression, logistic regression: attribute-value learning‣set of i.i.d. samples from P(X, Y)•Not all data is like this‣an attribute is a property of a single entity‣what about properties of sets of entities?27Application: document clustering28Application: recommendations29Latent-variable models30Best-known LVM: PCA•Suppose Xij, Uik, Vjk all ~ Gaussian‣yields principal components analysis‣or probabilistic PCA‣or Bayesian


View Full Document

CMU CS 10601 - review

Documents in this Course
lecture

lecture

40 pages

Problem

Problem

12 pages

lecture

lecture

36 pages

Lecture

Lecture

31 pages

Review

Review

32 pages

Lecture

Lecture

11 pages

Lecture

Lecture

18 pages

Notes

Notes

10 pages

Boosting

Boosting

21 pages

review

review

21 pages

review

review

28 pages

Lecture

Lecture

31 pages

lecture

lecture

52 pages

Review

Review

26 pages

review

review

29 pages

Lecture

Lecture

37 pages

Lecture

Lecture

35 pages

Boosting

Boosting

17 pages

Review

Review

35 pages

lecture

lecture

32 pages

Lecture

Lecture

28 pages

Lecture

Lecture

30 pages

lecture

lecture

29 pages

leecture

leecture

41 pages

lecture

lecture

34 pages

review

review

38 pages

Lecture

Lecture

41 pages

Lecture

Lecture

15 pages

Lecture

Lecture

21 pages

Lecture

Lecture

38 pages

Notes

Notes

37 pages

lecture

lecture

29 pages

Load more
Download review
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view review and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view review 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?