DOC PREVIEW
UCLA GEOG 5 - Population

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Geography 5 Week 4 Lecture 8 Paul Ehrlich (1932 to present) - Ph.D. in biological sciences (Kansas), professor in Stanford - The Population Bomb (1968) o Predicted that “in the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death” due to overpopulation o A Malthusian Catastrophe argument - Introduced the I = P x A x T equation o (I)mpact o (P)opulation o (A)ffluence o (T)echnology - The Population Explosion Ehrlich, 1990 o “Arresting population growth should be second in importance only to avoiding nuclear war…” o Two solutions  Death rate solution – do nothing  Birth rate solutions – birth control Garrett Hardin (1915-2003) - PhD in Microbiology (Stanford, Professor at UCSB) - Tragedy of the Commons (1968) o Argument about Individual Benefit vs. Common Cost  Cost is spread over the rest of society  Tragedy of the Commons can exist if there is mismanagement  People (are selfish) and will exploit “The Commons”  Therefore Privatization is key “Lifeboat Ethics” - immigration - resources and population - solution – not let them in the boat and let them drown o benign neglect The Cornucopian View- The problem between population and resources can be solved by human ingenuity - Humans act “rationally” (unlike Malthus who saw poor as irrational) - Carrying Capacity of Nature can be raised with Technological Solutions o ex. Green Revolution  problems: concentration in power, etc  Food supply vs. Total Population  Consumption vs. Time Ester Boserup (1910 to 1999) - The Conditions of Agricultural Growth 1965 - Argued Population determines Agricultural Methods o Unlike Malthus who argued Agricultural Methods determine Population - “The power of ingenuity would always outmatch that of demand.” - cornucopian view The Socio-Political View - Political and Economic factors play a role in Overpopulation - Poverty  Overpopulation o Why  Labor is the only asset of the poor (No capital)  Poor don’t have access to Birth Control, Education  High infant mortality rates encourages many attempts at birth (reduced risk)  Social Security for Elderly (reduces risk)  cultural/economic condition  Gender Inequality / Opportunity for Women Development Perspectives - Demographic Transition Model / Theory China & Population - Current Population is about 1.4 Billion (20% world population (#1)o India 1.19 billion, USA 310million, Indonesia 240 million, Brazil 190 million.. - Some Chinese Provinces are Larger than Major Countries o Sichuan 107million; Henan 85million; Shadong 84million - Historical Population Growth o Columbian Exchange  New world crops, ex: tomatoes  Potatoes, South America  Corn, Central America/North America  These crops can be grown in equally marginal lands; areas of low water, hilly areas, etc - Current Growth Rate at about .5% o India 1.3%, USA .9%, - Post Revolution (1949-Present) Population Trends o Birth rates going down o Very high during WWII - Population Policy in Post-Revolution China o Mao Zedong Encouraged Population Growth …Why?  1. Increase Military Strength  Experience of the Civil and Korean Wars  “We shouldn’t be afraid of atomic missiles. No matter what kind of war breaks out – convention or thermonuclear – we’ll win. As for China, if the imperialists unleash war on us…..”  2. Increase Labor Power  “Every Mouth comes with Two Hands” – Mao Zedong  Marxist Orthodoxy (i.e. no population problem under socialism)  “It is a very good thing that China has a big population. Even if China’s population multiplies many times, she is fully capable of finding a solution; the solution is production.” - Population Policy in the Reform Period (1979 – Present) o One Child Policy (Early 1980’s) o Moderate Left rises Marxist attitudes o Initially tied to Economic Development o In the 1990s, tied to Environmental Issues o Implement population control in order to improve the ecological environment! o Reaction of Marxist / Maoist attitudes o Embracing of Neo-Malthusian attitudes ? - Problems with One Child


View Full Document
Download Population
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Population and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Population 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?