Front Back
methods of acquiring knowledge
science tenacity (superstitions) common sense intuition mysticism (altered state of consciousness) authority
science is based on a set of assumptions which are
realism rationality regularity causality or determination discoverability
realism
objects exist outside of the mind
rationality
reasoning and logic are the basis for solving problems
regularity
phenomena exists in recurring patterns
causality or determination
all events happen because of preceding events
discoverability
it is possible to learn solutions to questions, our only limitations are time and resources
characteristics of scientific approach
control operational definition empirical objective replication self-correcting progressive tentative parsimonious concerned with theory
validity
appropriateness of inferences drawn from data
research validity types
internal external statistical conclusion construct
test and measurement validity types
criterion-related content-related construct-related
research validity
conclusion based on a research study is valid when it corresponds to the actual or true state of the world
internal validity
we can infer that a relationship between two variables is causal or that the absence of a relationship implies absence of cause
extraneous variable
any variable other than the IV that influences the DV
confounding
an extraneous variable that systematically varies with the IV
threats to internal validity
history maturation testing attrition or mortality selection regression effects
how to correct for threats to internal validity
random assignment
external validity
causal relationships can be generalized to the general population
threats to external validity
population validity (other participants) ecological validity (other settings) temporal validity (other times)
how to correct threats to external validity
random sampling
statistical conclusion validity
appropriateness of inferences made from data. Are IV and DV statistically related?
threats to statistical conclusion validity
low statistical power violated assumptions of statistical tests reliability of measures' scores
construct validity
correct labeling. Do our results support the theory underlying the research
threats to construct validity
loose connection between theory and study changes in research participants' behaviors that result from their tendency to alter their behavior because they are being studied
how to correct threats to construct validity
double-blind procedures single-blind procedures deception
ex of artificial discrete variable
young/old
ex of natural discrete variable
male/female
list of worst to best ways to create artificial discrete variables
mean split median split extreme groups
pearson's correlation
both variables are continuous
point-biserial
one variable is true dichotomy, cannot assume normal distribution
biserial
one variable is artificial dichotomy, we can assume normal distribution
phi coefficient
both variables are dichotomies
categorical variable
qualitative
labels
the use of numbers that cannot be mathematically analyzed (ex. UIN)
nominal scale
grouping objects and giving them a number (men 1, women 2)
ordinal scale
ordered from most to least (ex. top five contestants)
interval scale
most common tells how far apart objects are from one another but not the absolute magnitude (1=do not like, 5=really like)
ratio scale
preceding 4 levels of measurement in addition to a true zero (ex. speed)
correlation coefficients are a characteristic of
reliability
correlation coefficient range
-1 to +1
criterion-related validity
effectiveness of a test in predicting an individual's behavior in specific situations
concurrent predictive postdictive
criterion-related validity
content-related validity
the degree to which a predictor convers a representative sample of the behavior being assessed
construct-related validity
extent to which the test may be said to measure theoretical construct or trait
convergent validity
construct-related validity different measures of the same construct should be correlated to each other
discriminant validity
construct-related validity different constructs should not be correlated to each other
multi-trait/multi-method matrix
most common approach to assessing the construct-related validity
a test's scores cannot be
valid but not reliable

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Login

Join to view and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?