ZOOL 4133: phylogenetics
23 Cards in this Set
Front | Back |
---|---|
most closely related taxa, should have most traits in common
|
logic of phylogenetic inference
|
homologous traits that are shared among species and are similar because they were modified in a common ancestor (shared derived traits)
|
synapomorphies
|
examples of synapomorphies
|
1. Fur, even though being a homologous trait, it is not a syapomorphy because it is not derived
2. bobcat tail IS a syapomorphy characterizing bobcats and lynxes
|
these traits identify monophyletic groups
|
synapomorphies
|
identification of derived requires ......
|
outgroup analysis
|
bacterial examples for synapomorphies
|
1. DNA, even though being a homologous trait, is not a synapomorphy because it is not derived
2. cell structure is a synapomorphy characterizing bacteria and eukaryotes
|
The most closely related taxa should have most traits in common!
|
Logic of phylogenetic inference
|
Two key insights to the logic of phylogenies..
|
1. Synapomorhies identify evolutionary branch points
2. Synapomorphies are nested
|
occurs when natural selection favors similar structures as solutions to problems posed by similar environments (analogous traits)
|
Convergent evolution
|
Leads to trait similarity, but traits are not homologous
|
Convergent Evolution
|
"back mutations" that can remove synapomorphies
|
Reversals
|
Both lumped under homoplasy
|
convergent evolution
|
can reverse a DNA sequence back to the same as the original ancestor
|
reversal
|
difference btw synapomorphies and homoplasies
|
Synaps maximize the use of reliable info and homoplasies minimize the impact of misleading info.
|
use the most simple explanation available
|
parsimony
|
similarity in the characters found in different species that is due to convergence, parallelism, or reversal ( not common descent)
|
homoplasy
|
the similarity between species that result from inheritance of traits from a common ancestor
|
Homology
|
criterion for selecting among alternative patterns or explanations based on minimizing the total amount of change or complexity
|
parsimony
|
Morphology describe pros and cons
|
1. essential when only fossils are available
2. powerful when homology can be distinguished from homoplasy
3. Data is hard to collect
|
Molecules describe the pros and cons of using it for phylogenetics
|
1. data relatively easy to collect
2. homoplasies can statistically be accounted for
3. entirely avoiding homoplasies is almost impossible
|
the pros of phylogeny and systematics
|
High predictability and explanatory power.
classification based on relationships rather than morphological similarities
|
example used to describe molecular clocks
|
head/body lice in humans helped date when ppl started wearing clothes. they used the divergence tiime between head and body lice as an estimate of the origin of clothes.
|
the use of evolutionary trees in answering questions about the geographic distribution of organisms.
|
Phylogeography
|